Journals / Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 20 - Sayı: 3

THE ROLE OF NATIONAL CULTURE IN SOCIAL ENTREPRENEURSHIP

SOSYAL GİRİŞİMCİLİKTE ULUSAL KÜLTÜRÜN ROLÜ

Pages
641–658
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In this context, it can be said that it is difficult to talk about “social entrepreneurship culture” like entrepreneurship culture.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This paper aims to investigate the relationship between social entrepreneurship activity and the national culture of a country.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The Social Entrepreneurship Effectiveness (SEA) indices from the 2015 Global Entrepreneurship Monitoring (GEM) study have been used as indicators of a country’s social entrepreneurship activity in two dimensions (The average prevalence rate of broad social entrepreneurial activity among nascent entrepreneurs in the start-up phase (SEASU-BRD) and the average prevalence rate of individuals who are currently leading an operating social entrepreneurial activity (SEA-OP-BRD)).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In this context, it can be said that it is difficult to talk about “social entrepreneurship culture” like entrepreneurship culture.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2015 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This paper aims to investigate the relationship between social entrepreneurship activity and the national culture of a country. The Social Entrepreneurship Effectiveness (SEA) indices from the 2015 Global Entrepreneurship Monitoring (GEM) study have been used as indicators of a country’s social entrepreneurship activity in two dimensions (The average prevalence rate of broad social entrepreneurial activity among nascent entrepreneurs in the start-up phase (SEASU-BRD) and the average prevalence rate of individuals who are currently leading an operating social entrepreneurial activity (SEA-OP-BRD)). The three cultural frameworks created by Hofstede, the GLOBE project, and Schwartz have been used to make cultural comparisons between countries. Correlation analyses have been utilized to reveal the relationships that were desired to be investigated. The most important result obtained according to the findings is that the relationship between the dimensions of the three cultural frameworks and the SEA-SU-BRD is not found. Again, a small number of sub-dimensions were found to be associated with SEA-OP-BRD. In this context, it can be said that it is difficult to talk about “social entrepreneurship culture” like entrepreneurship culture.

Özet

Bu çalışma, sosyal girişimcilik aktivitesi ile ülkelerin ulusal kültürü arasındakiilişkiyi incelemeyi amaçlamaktadır. 2015 Küresel Girişimcilik İzleme (GEM)çalışmasından elde edilen Sosyal Girişimcilik Etkinliği (SEA) endeksleri, ikiboyutta (Başlangıç aşamasında yeni başlayan girişimciler arasında genel sosyalgirişimcilik aktivitesinin ortalama yaygınlık oranı (SEA-SU-BRD) ve halenfaaliyet göstermekte olan bir sosyal girişimcilik faaliyetine liderlik eden bireylerinortalama yaygınlık oranı (SEA-OP-BRD)) ülkelerin sosyal girişimcilikfaaliyetinin bir göstergesi olarak kullanılmıştır. Ülkeler arası kültürel karşılaştırmayapmak için Hofstede, GLOBE projesi ve Schwartz’ın oluşturduğu üç kültürelçerçeveden yararlanılmıştır. Araştırılmak istenen ilişkileri ortaya çıkarmak içinkorelasyon analizlerinden yararlanılmıştır. Bulgulara göre elde edilen en önemlisonuç üç kültürel çerçevenin boyutları ile SEA-SU-BRD’nin ilişkisininbulunamamasıdır. Yine az sayıda alt boyutun SEA-OP-BRD ile ilişkisibulunmuştur. Bu bağlamda girişimcilik kültüründen bahsedildiği gibi bir sosyalgirişimcilik kültüründen bahsetmenin oldukça zor olduğu söylenebilir.

🔖

Cite This Article

YİĞİT, S. (2022). THE ROLE OF NATIONAL CULTURE IN SOCIAL ENTREPRENEURSHIP. Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, Cilt: 20 - Sayı: 3, 641–658. https://ajindex.com/articles/426660

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Austin, J., Stevenson, H., & Wei–Skillern, J. (2006), Social and Commercial Entrepreneurship: Same, Different, or Both?, Entrepreneurship: Theory & Practice, 30(1), s.1-22.
  2. Bercovitch, J., & Elgström, O. (2011), Culture and International Mediation. J. Bercovitch içinde, Theory and Practice of International Mediation: Selected Essays (s. 228-246). New York: Routledge. Beugelsdijk, S., & Welzel, C. (2018), Dimensions and Dynamics of National Culture: Synthesizing Hofstede With Inglehart. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 49(10), s.1469–1505.
  3. Bosma, N., Schøtt, T., Terjesen, S., & Kew, P. (2016), Special Topic Report Social entrepreneurship. Global Entrepreneurship Research Association: https://www.gemconsortium.org/report/gem-2015- report-on-social-entrepreneurship, (Erişim tarihi:01.09.2019).
  4. Calza, F., Cannavale, C., & Nadali, I. Z. (2020). How Do Cultural Values Influence Entrepreneurial Behavior of Nations? A Behavioral Reasoning Approach. International Business Review, 29(5),1-13.
  5. Coker, K. K., Flight, R. L., & Valle, K. N. (2017), Social Entrepreneurship: The Role of National Leadership Culture, Journal of Research in Marketing and Entrepreneurship, 19(2), s.125-139.
  6. Cronk, L. (2017), Culture’s Influence on Behavior: Steps Toward a Theory. Evolutionary Behavioral Sciences, 11(1), s.36-52.
  7. Davidsson, P. (1995),
  8. Culture, Structure and Regional Levels of Entrepreneurship, Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 7(1), s.41-62.
  9. Davidsson, P., & Wiklund, J. (1997),
  10. Values, Beliefs and Regional Variations in New Firm Formation Rates, Journal of Economic Psychology, 18(2-3), s.179-199.
  11. Dees, J. G. (1998, Ekim 31), The Meaning of Social Entrepreneurship. https://centers.fuqua.duke.edu/case/wpcontent/uploads/sites/7/2015/03/Article_Dees_MeaningofSocialEnt repreneurship_2001.pdf, (Erişim tarihi:05.09.2019).
  12. Gampelaere, C. V. (2016), The Role Of Culture in Cross-Border M&A. S. C. Whitaker içinde, Cross-Border Mergers and Acquisitions (s. 139- 164), New Jersey: Wiley. GLOBE. (2019, Ekim 15), About the Studies. Global Leadership & Organizational Behaviour Effectiveness: https://globeproject.com/studies, (Erişim tarihi:01.08.2019).
  13. Hayton, J. C., George, G., & Zahra, S. A. (2002), National Culture and Entrepreneurship: A Review of Behavioral Research. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 26(4), s.33-52. Hechavarría, D. M. (2015), The Impact of Culture on National Prevalence Rates of Social and Commercial Entrepreneurship, International Entrepreneurship and Mana