SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi / 2016 / Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 3

BİR İNGİLİZCE ÖĞRETMENİ EĞİTİMİ PROGRAMININ MİKRO ÖĞRETİM BOYUTUNUN İNCELENMESİ

EXPLORING THE MICROTEACHING COMPONENT OF AN EFL TEACHER EDUCATION PROGRAM

Abdullah COŞKUN
Pages
810–829
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results indicated that the microteaching component of the course generally contributed to participants' improvement of their English language, their teaching practice competence, and their lesson preparation.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Microteaching is an important component of pre-service English language teacher education programs.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Thus, the aim of the study is to explore the views of 86 third-year non-native pre-service teachers at the Department of English Language Teaching at a university in Turkey regarding the microteaching component of a 14-week course.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results indicated that the microteaching component of the course generally contributed to participants' improvement of their English language, their teaching practice competence, and their lesson preparation.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Microteaching is an important component of pre-service English language teacher education programs. Thus, the aim of the study is to explore the views of 86 third-year non-native pre-service teachers at the Department of English Language Teaching at a university in Turkey regarding the microteaching component of a 14-week course. Throughout the course, each pre-service teacher performed a microteaching session which took between 15 and 20 minutes, observed the sessions of their peers, and gave them written feedback. At the end of the term, pre-service teachers were given a questionnaire including Likert-type items and some open-ended questions. The quantitative data were analyzed using frequency and percentage analyses, while participants' responses to the open-ended questions were analyzed through content analysis. The results indicated that the microteaching component of the course generally contributed to participants' improvement of their English language, their teaching practice competence, and their lesson preparation. However, some participants expressed their negative feelings about issues, such as the artificial microteaching environment and made relevant suggestions for the improvement of microteaching activities

Özet

Mikro öğretim, hizmet öncesi İngilizce öğretmeni yetiştirme programlarının önemli bir birleşenidir. Dolayısıyla, bu çalışmanın amacı Türkiye'deki bir üniversitenin İngilizce öğretimi programında eğitim gören ve ana dili İngilizce olmayan 86 üçüncü sınıf öğrencisinin 14 hafta süren bir ders kapsamındaki mikro öğretim uygulamalarıyla ilgili görüşlerini araştırmaktadır. Bu ders boyunca, her öğrenci 15-20 dakika süren bir mikro öğretim uygulaması gerçekleştirmiş, arkadaşlarının uygulamalarını gözlemlemiş ve onlara geribildirimde bulunmuştur. Dönem sonunda, her öğrenciye Likert tipi maddeler ve açık uçlu sorulardan oluşan bir anket verilmiştir. Katılımcıların açık uçlu sorulara verdiği cevaplar içerik analizi yöntemiyle yapılırken nicel verilerin analizi frekans ve yüzde analizi ile yapılmıştır. Sonuçlar, dersin mikro öğretim bileşeninin öğrencilerin İngilizce dili gelişimine, öğretmenlik uygulaması yeterliklerine ve ders hazırlamalarına genel olarak katkı sağladığını göstermiştir. Fakat bazı katılımcılar, yapay mikro öğretim ortamı gibi konulara ilişkin olumsuz duygularını ifade etmiş ve mikro öğretim uygulamalarının geliştirilmesine yönelik tavsiyelerde bulunmuşlardır

🔖

Cite This Article

COŞKUN, A. (2022). BİR İNGİLİZCE ÖĞRETMENİ EĞİTİMİ PROGRAMININ MİKRO ÖĞRETİM BOYUTUNUN İNCELENMESİ. Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 3, 810–829. https://ajindex.com/articles/426438

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Al-Humaidi, S. H., & Abu-Rahman M. S. (2015). Enhancing microteaching at Sultan Qaboos University. Studies in English Language Teaching, 3(1), 28-40.
  2. Akalın, S. (2003). İngilizce’nin Yabancı dil olarak öğretilmesinde mikroöğretim ve Atatürk Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi İngilizce Öğretmenliği Bölümünde Uygulanması. Kazım Karabekir Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 7, 11-15.
  3. Amobi, F. A. (2005). Pre-service teachers' reflectivity on the sequence and consequences of teaching actions in a microteaching experience. Teacher Education Quarterly, 32(1), 115-128.
  4. Amobi, F. A., & Irwin, L. (2009). Implementing on-campus microteaching to elicit preservice teachers' reflection on teaching actions: Fresh perspective on an established practice. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 9(1), 27- 34. Arends, R. I. (2000). Learning to Teach. Newyork: Mc Graw-Hill. Arsal, Z. (2014). Microteaching and pre-service teachers’ sense of self-efficacy in teaching. European Journal of Teacher Education, 37(4), 453-464.
  5. Bailey, K. M. (2006). Language teacher supervision: A case-based approach. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  6. Bell, A. (2007). Exploring tutors' conceptions of excellent tutoring. Teaching and Learning in (Higher) Education for Sessional Staff, 1(1), 1-16.
  7. Bell, A., & Mladenovic, R. (2008). The benefits of peer observation of teaching for tutor development. Higher Education, 55, 735-752.
  8. Blair, J. (2001, November 7). Total immersion. Education Week, 21(10), 42-46.
  9. Blank, A. (2009). Reflection and professional practice. In A. Atwal and M. Jones (Eds.), Preparing for Professional Practice in Health and Social Care (pp.41–50).
  10. Ames, IA: Wiley-Blackwell. Britton, L. R., & Anderson, K. A. (2010). Peer coaching and pre-service teachers: Examining an underutilized concept. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(2), 306–314.
  11. Büyükkarcı, K. (2014). Formative microteaching in teaching and foreign language anxiety. Anthropologist, 18(2), 505-511.
  12. Coşkun, A., & Daloğlu, A. (2010). Evaluating an English language teacher education program through Peacock’s model. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 35(6), 24-42.
  13. Cripwell, K., & Geddes, M. (1982). The development of organizational skills through microteaching. ELT Journal, 36(4), 232-236.
  14. Dörnyei, Z. (2007). Research methods in applied linguistics. New York: Oxford University. Press.
  15. Ekşi, G. (2012). Implementing an observation and feedback form for more effective feedback in microteaching. Education and Science, 37(164),