SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi / 2017 / Cilt: 17 - Sayı: 2

CLASSROOM TEACHERS’ OPINIONS ON THE USAGE OF WRITING STRATEGIES

SINIF ÖĞRETMENLERİNİN YAZMA STRATEJİLERİNİ KULLANMA DURUMLARINA İLİŞKİN GÖRÜŞLERİ

Özge ERDOĞAN
Pages
658–678
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results of the research indicate that classroom teachers do not have enough time for writing in their daily lives and that their use of writing strategies is very low

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The purpose of this research is to determine classroom teachers' opinions on the usage of writing strategies.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The research was carried out with 25 classroom teachers who were selected by maximum diversity sampling method from sampling methods working in primary schools in Trabzon province.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results of the research indicate that classroom teachers do not have enough time for writing in their daily lives and that their use of writing strategies is very low
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to determine classroom teachers' opinions on the usage of writing strategies. The research was carried out with 25 classroom teachers who were selected by maximum diversity sampling method from sampling methods working in primary schools in Trabzon province. Qualitative research method was used in the collection, analysis and interpretation of the data obtained in the research. The data of the study were obtained by semi-structured interview technique. The interviews were included a total of 8 open-ended questions that helped teachers determine both their demographic information and their use of writing strategies. The data obtained at the end of the interview were analyzed with descriptive analysis technique. The results of the research indicate that classroom teachers do not have enough time for writing in their daily lives and that their use of writing strategies is very low

Özet

Bu araştırmanın amacı sınıf öğretmenlerinin yazma stratejilerini kullanma durumlarına ilişkin görüşlerini belirlemektir. Araştırma Trabzon ili merkez ilkokullarında çalışan ve amaçlı örnekleme yöntemlerinden maksimum çeşitlilik örnekleme yöntemi ile seçilen 25 sınıf öğretmeni ile gerçekleştirilmiştir. Araştırmada elde edilen verilerin toplanması, analizi ve yorumlanmasında nitel araştırma yöntemi kullanılmıştır. Araştırmanın verileri yarı yapılandırılmış görüşme tekniği ile elde edilmiştir. Görüşmelerde öğretmenlerin yazma stratejilerini kullanma düzeylerini belirlemeye yardımcı olacak toplam 8 açık uçlu soruya yer verilmiştir. Görüşme sonunda elde edilen veriler betimsel analiz tekniği ile incelenmiştir. Araştırmada elde edilen sonuçlar ışığında, sınıf öğretmenlerinin günlük hayatlarında yazı yazmaya yeterince zaman ayırmadıkları ve yazma stratejilerini kullanma düzeylerinin oldukça düşük olduğu ortaya koyulmuştur

🔖

Cite This Article

ERDOĞAN, Ö. (2022). CLASSROOM TEACHERS’ OPINIONS ON THE USAGE OF WRITING STRATEGIES. Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 17 - Sayı: 2, 658–678. https://ajindex.com/articles/426387

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Akyol, H. (2010). Türkçe öğretim yöntemleri. Ankara:
  2. Pegem A Akademi. Anderson, N. J. (2003). Metacognition in writing: Facilitating writer awareness. In A.Stubbs and J. Chapman (Eds.). Rhetoric, uncertainty and the university as text: How students construct the academic experience (10-30).
  3. Regina. Bai, B. (2015). The effects of strategy -based writing instruction in Singapore primary schools. System, 53, 96-106.
  4. Bai, B. Hu, G. W. and Gu, P. Y. (2014). The relationship between writing strategies and English proficiency in Singapore primary schools, The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 23, 355-365.
  5. Berry, A. B. and Mason, L H. (2012).The effects of self-regulated strategy development on the writing of expository essays for adults with written expression difficulties: Preparing fort he GED, Remedial and Special Education, 33(2), 124-136.
  6. Bright, R. (2007). Write through the grades: Teaching writing in secondary schools, Canada: Portage Main Press.
  7. Bruning, R. and Horn, C. (2000). Developing motivation to write. Educational Psychologist, 35 (1), 25–37.
  8. Butterfield, E. C., Hacker, D. and Albertson, L. R. (1996). Environmental, cognitive, and metacognitive influences on text revision: Assessing the evidence. Educational Psychology Review 8, 239–298.
  9. Campbell-Rush, P. (2008). 10 strategies to improve writing instruction in the primary grades. The Education Digest, September, 35-39.
  10. Chien, S. C. (2010). Enhancing english composition teachers’ awareness of their students’ writing strategy use. The Asia Pacific Education Researcher, 19 (3), 417-438.
  11. Cohen, V. L. and Cowen, J. E. (2011). Literacy for children in an information age: Teaching reading, writing, and thinking. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Cengage Learning. Cremin, T. (2006). Creativity, uncertainty and discomfort: Teachers as writers. Cambridge Journal of Education, 36(3), 415–433.
  12. De Silva, R. (2015). Writing strategy instruction: Its impact on writing in a second language for academic purposes, Language Teaching Research, 19(3), 301- 323. De Silva, R. and Graham, S. (2015). The effects of strategy instruction on writing strategy use for students of different proficiency levels. System, 53, 47-59.
  13. Dennis, L. R. and Votteler, N. K. (2013). Preschool teachers and children’s emergent writing: Supporting diverse learners. Early Childhood Education Journal, 41, 439–446.
  14. Dorn, L. J. and Soffos, C. (2001). Scaffolding young writers. America: Stenhouse Publishers.
  15. Erdoğan. E. (2012). Süreç temelli yaratıcı yazma uy