Journals / A|Z ITU Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi / 2021 / Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 1

The relationship between living environment and daily life routines of older adults

Pages
29–43
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The findings reveal that living in an neighbourhood that does not support basic needs, such as green open space, housing, social activities, may lead older adults to isolate themselves from community.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The population has been ageing dramatically since 1950s.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Since a significant proportion of the global population lives in urban areas, it is necessary to highlight the importance of designing neighbourhoods to meet the needs of older adults.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The findings reveal that living in an neighbourhood that does not support basic needs, such as green open space, housing, social activities, may lead older adults to isolate themselves from community.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The population has been ageing dramatically since 1950s. Therefore addressing age-friendliness has become an important approach in every country. Since a significant proportion of the global population lives in urban areas, it is necessary to highlight the importance of designing neighbourhoods to meet the needs of older adults. This study reveals the relationship between the urban environment and the daily routines of elderly people, differentiated in terms of income level. The study addresses not only the fundamental aspects of neighbourhood design in relation to ageing in place but also how income level affects the ability to be an active citizen in the community. This research used in-depth interviews to compare the experiences of older adults (aged over 70) living in Fatih and Nisantası, two neighbourhoods of Istanbul, Turkey, which are divergent in terms of both income level and urban design features. The findings reveal that living in an neighbourhood that does not support basic needs, such as green open space, housing, social activities, may lead older adults to isolate themselves from community. On the other hand, being able to access urban facilities easily and having a higher income level or financially independency increases older people’s engagement in paid leisure activities, engagement to the city and level of sociability. This paper delivers that the ability to be active in later life is considerably influenced by both living environment and income. Also, enhancing the physical infrastructure of poorer neighbourhoods may have a proportionally greater impact on older people’s wellbeing.

🔖

Cite This Article

BAYAR, R., TÜRKOĞLU, H. (2022). The relationship between living environment and daily life routines of older adults. A|Z ITU Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 1, 29–43. https://ajindex.com/articles/426357

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (8)

  1. Antonucci, T. C., Ajrouch, K. J., & Birditt, K. (2006). Social relations in the third age. The Crown of Life: Dynamics of the Early Post-Retirement Period. Annual Review of Gerontology and Geriatric, 26, 193–210. A&DS Architecture& Design Scotland (n.d.). Accessed on January 20, 2020
  2. Aquino, J. A., Russell, D. W., Cutrona, C. E., & Altmaier, E. M. (1996). Employment status, social support, and life satisfaction among the elderly. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 43(4), 480. Balfour, J. L., & Kaplan, G. A. (2002). Neighbourhood environment and loss of physical function in older adults: evidence from the Alameda County Study. American Journal of Epidemiology, 155(6), 507–515.
  3. Banister, D., & Bowling, A. (2004). Quality of life for the elderly: the transport dimension. Transport policy, 11(2), 105-115.
  4. Beard, J., Kalache, A., Delgado, M., & Hill, T. (2012). Ageing and urbanization. Global Population Ageing: Peril or Promise?, 93. Boyce, C., & Neale, P. (2006). Conducting in-depth interviews: A guide for designing and conducting in-depth interviews for evaluation input. Bukov, A., Maas, I., & Lampert, T. (2002). Social participation in very old age: Cross-sectional and longitudinal findings from BASE. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 57(6), P510– P517 Ceylan, H., Kurtkapan, H., & Turan, B. (2015). İstanbul’da yaşlanmak: Türkiye’de Yaşlıların yaşam durumları (M. Şentürk & H. Ceylan, Eds.). Davey, J. A., de Joux, V., Nana, G., & Arcus, M. (2004). Accommodation options for older people in Aotearoa/New Zealand. Citeseer. Dowd, J. J. (1980).
  5. Stratification of the Aged. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole Publishing Company. Fatih Municipality. (2018). Tarihi Yarımada Fatih’in Tarihçesi ( The History of Golden Horn: Fatih). Retrieved June 5, 2019, from http://www.fatih. bel.tr/icerik/86/tarihi-yarimada-fatihin- tarihcesi/ Gehl, J. (2011). Life between buildings: using public space. Island press. Gorman, M. (1999). Development and the rights of older people. 3–21.
  6. Howden-Chapman, P., Signal, L., & Crane, J. (1999). Housing and health in older people: ageing in place. Social Policy Journal of New Zealand, 14-30.
  7. Hunter, R. H., Sykes, K., Lowman, S. G., Duncan, R., Satariano, W. A., & Belza, B. (2011). Environmental and policy change to support healthy aging. Journal of Aging & Social Policy, 23(4), 354–371.
  8. Ilgar, L. (2008). Yaşlılık dönemi sosyal özellikleri ve serbest zaman etkinlikleri. Psikolojik Sosyal ve Bedensel Açıdan Ya