Journals / A|Z ITU Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi / 2021 / Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 1

The experimental works conducted on modern heritage and mixed system buildings with the purpose of the conservation and restoration

Pages
171–182
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

According to the results, the conservation and restoration applications were recommended for the case study buildings.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Within the 20th century, the National Architectural Period in Turkey began and the structures which had mixed systems with reinforced concrete (RC) and masonry was seen commonly.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This period is also called “Modernization” and the buildings were considered as Modern Architectural Heritage structures.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:According to the results, the conservation and restoration applications were recommended for the case study buildings.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Within the 20th century, the National Architectural Period in Turkey began and the structures which had mixed systems with reinforced concrete (RC) and masonry was seen commonly. This period is also called “Modernization” and the buildings were considered as Modern Architectural Heritage structures. Since most of these buildings are used today, conservation and restoration attempts have become more essential to maintain safety conditions for users with the cultural heritage value of the buildings. Some parameters should be taken into account like the material properties, environmental conditions and human activities that are more effective in the degradation of the structures. However, the conservation and restoration of mixed structures are less investigated in literature because these structures have complex construction techniques and there are not definite rules in the related regulations. So, these kinds of articles that present the studies can be seen invaluable for the structures which has similar problems and solutions. This paper presents in-situ examination and laboratory analyses on the building materials used in Istanbul University Buildings accepted as a cultural heritage masonry infilled RC structure. First of all, in-situ examination was done according to the observations on the exterior and interior walls, Secondly, representative material samples taken from different locations of the buildings both masonry and the RC sections. For the determination of the properties and deteriorations of the materials, the chemical analyses and the physical and mechanical tests were conducted. According to the results, the conservation and restoration applications were recommended for the case study buildings.

🔖

Cite This Article

ARIOĞLU, N., YATAĞAN, M. S., ÖZGÜNLER, S. A. (2022). The experimental works conducted on modern heritage and mixed system buildings with the purpose of the conservation and restoration. A|Z ITU Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 1, 171–182. https://ajindex.com/articles/426351

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Ahunbay, Z. (2004). Conservation and Restoration of Historical Environment, (Tarihi Çevre Koruma ve Restorasyon), YEM Publishing, p.134. ISBN: 975-7438-38-3 (in Turkish). Alsaç Ü. (1976). Türkiye’deki Mimarlık Düşüncesinin, Cumhuriyet Dönemindeki Evrimi, KTÜ İnşaat ve Mimarlık Fakültesi, Trabzon. Arıoğlu, N. & Acun, S. (2006). A Research About a Method for Restoration of Traditional Mortars and Plasters: A Staging System Approach, Journal of Building and Environment, Elsevier Publishing, Vol.41, pp.1223-1230.
  2. Batur, A. (1994). Cumhuriyet Dönemi 1938–1950/Savaş Yılları ve II. Milli Mimari Akımı, Dünden Bugüne İstanbul Ansiklopedisi, C.2, İstanbul, s.450–451.
  3. Calderini, C. (2008). Use of Reinforced Concrete in Preservation of Historic Buildings: Conceptions and Misconceptions in the Early 20th Century, International Journal of Architectural Heritage, Vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 25-59.
  4. Erlemann, G. G. (1999). Steel Reinforcing Bar Specification in Old Structures. Concrete International, pp. 49–50.
  5. Ersoy, U. & Özcebe, G. (2017). Reinforced Concrete, 7th Edition,
  6. Evrim Press,
  7. Istanbul, Turkey. Esponda, M. (2010). Assessment of The Use of Reinforced Concrete in The Preservation of Historical Buildings, 8th International Symposium on the Conservation of Monuments in the Mediterranean Basin: Monument Damage Hazards & Rehabilitation Technologies, Patras, Greece. Gaudette, P. E., (2000). Special Considerations in Repair of Historic Concrete. Concrete Repair Bulletin, January/ February, pp.12–13. icomos.org/ charters/venice_e.pdf, Venice, Italy. Gaudette, P. & Slaton, D. (2007).
  8. Preservation of Historic Concrete, Preservation Briefs 15, U.S. Department of Interior, Technical Presentation Services. ICOMOS. (2001).
  9. Recommendations for the Analysis, Conservation and Structural Restoration of Architectural Heritage, International Scientific Committee for Analysis and Restoration of Structures of Architectural Heritage www.esicomos.org/Nueva./ISCARSAHSept2001. doc, Paris, France. Işık, G. (2010). Kayseri’de Erken Cumhuriyet Dönemi Eğitim Yapıları, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Erciyes Üniversitesi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, s.2, Kayseri. Kortan, E. (2000). 75 Yılda Türkiye’de Planlama/Kentleşme-Koruma Politikaları ve Mimarlık, TMMOB Mimarlar Odası Yayınları, s.97-105,
  10. Ankara.
  11. Macdonald, Susan, ed., (2003), Concrete: Building Pathology, Osney Mead, Oxford, U.K., Blackwell Science. Menon, A. (2010).
  12. Cement, Concrete and Conservation, ACECON2010, ICI Asian Conference on Ecstasy in Concrete, P