Journals / A|Z ITU Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi / 2021 / Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 1

LEED certified mixed-use residential buildings in Istanbul: A study on category-based performances

Pages
139–152
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It was found that Energy and Atmosphere category gained much lower attention than required.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The building industry has a significant negative effect on climate change and increases other environmental problems at the global scale.
📊
Key Findings & Data:LEED’s database revealed a total of twenty-one certified projects under the New Constructions (v.3) scheme.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It was found that Energy and Atmosphere category gained much lower attention than required.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The building industry has a significant negative effect on climate change and increases other environmental problems at the global scale. LEED, which is one of the most globally used environmental assessment tool, provides the certification of projects according to the evaluation criteria of green buildings under certain categories. On the other hand, an emerging form of architecture, the mixed-use residential high-rise building (MRB), appears in larger numbers especially in the metropolitans of developing countries, such as Istanbul. This building typology displays a positive approach in the context of sustainability. Since they are high-budget projects addressing to high-income groups, it is inherently expected that they have a green approach as a social responsibility. The objective of this study is to analyze LEED certified MRBs in Istanbul by focusing on their prioritization of evaluation categories. LEED’s database revealed a total of twenty-one certified projects under the New Constructions (v.3) scheme. Based on the gained points by these projects, mean rank values of the evaluation categories were calculated, which indicated the priorities given by this sample group. Furthermore, the conducted Kruskal-Wallis test showed there was highly significant difference among the rankings of the categories for these projects. Based on these rank order tests, obtained category priority order of MRBs was compared to the one implied by LEED’s assigned category weights. It was found that Energy and Atmosphere category gained much lower attention than required. Taking the results of the study into account, certain conclusions were drawn for this building type in Istanbul.

🔖

Cite This Article

SÜZER, Ö. (2022). LEED certified mixed-use residential buildings in Istanbul: A study on category-based performances. A|Z ITU Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 1, 139–152. https://ajindex.com/articles/426349

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (6)

  1. Ahmad, T., Aibinu, A., & Thaheem, M. J. (2017). The Effects of High-rise Residential Construction on Sustainability of Housing Systems. Procedia Engineering, 180, 1695–1704. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.PROENG. 2017.04.332 Ağaoğlu (2019a). Ağaoğlu Maslak 1453. Retrieved from http://www. maslak1453.com/en/ (accessed July 17, 2019). Ağaoğlu, (2019b). Andromeda Gold. Retrieved from http://www. andromedagold.com/en/?pid=1 (accessed July 17, 2019).
  2. Akgün, T. (2010). Karma işlevli yapıların kentsel ve mimari tasarım arakesitinde kamu yararı gözetilerek irdelenmesi: Zincirlikuyu-Levent aksı örneği. Istanbul: Istanbul Technical University Akpınar, A., Kömürcü, M. İ., Önsoy, H., & Kaygusuz, K. (2008). Status of geothermal energy amongst Turkey’s energy sources. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 12(4), 1148–1161. https://doi.org/10.1016/J. RSER.2006.10.016 Ali, H. H., & Al Nsairat, S. F. (2009). Developing a green building assessment tool for developing countries – Case of Jordan. Building and Environment, 44(5), 1053–1064. https://doi. org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv. 2008.07.015 Al-Kodmany, K. (2018). The Sustainability of Tall Building Developments: A Conceptual Framework. Buildings, 8(1), 7. https://doi. org/10.3390/buildings8010007 Anadolu Grubu (2019). AND Pastel. Retrieved from https://www.andpastel. com/en/default.aspx (accessed July 17, 2019).
  3. Argyrous, G. (2011). Statistics for Research: With a Guide to SPSS. SAGE Publications. Aslankan, A. (2019). The production of urban and residential language by mixed-use mega projects in Istanbul. Megaron, 14(50), 1–10. https:// doi.org/10.5505/megaron.2018.66199 (accessed November 14, 2019).
  4. Aşçıoğlu (2019). Selenium Retro. Retrieved from http://www.seleniumretro9. com/en/residences (accessed July 17, 2019).
  5. Barros, P., Ng Fat, L., Garcia, L. M. T., Slovic, A. D., Thomopoulos, N., de Sá, T. H., … Mindell, J. S. (2019). Social consequences and mental health outcomes of living in high-rise residential buildings and the influence of planning, urban design and architectural decisions: A systematic review. Cities, 93, 263–272. https://doi. org/10.1016/J.CITIES.2019.05.015 BB Yapı (2019). Konut Çınar. Retrieved from http://bbyapi.net/proje/ konut-cinar (accessed July 17, 2019). Being wise with waste: the EU’s approach to waste management. (2010). https://doi.org/10.2779/93543
  6. Bentley, I., Alcock, A., Murrain, P., McGlynn, S., & Smith, G. P. (1985). Responsive Environments. London: Architectural Press. Castro-La