Journals / A|Z ITU Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi / 2021 / Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 2

A review on changing housing approaches and media contents in Turkey: 1930-1980 period

Pages
429–441
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In this context, the article aims to examine the change in the housing approaches in Turkey through the media contents from the 1930s to the 1980s, based on the attitude of the media to guide society, which changes parallel with the dynamics of each period.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The change in the understanding of housing in Turkey began in the late nine- teenth century within the framework of modernization movements.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this process, which continued from the 1930s to the 1980s, the media has attracted attention as an important tool in imposing the new housing concepts on Turkish society.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In this context, the article aims to examine the change in the housing approaches in Turkey through the media contents from the 1930s to the 1980s, based on the attitude of the media to guide society, which changes parallel with the dynamics of each period.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The change in the understanding of housing in Turkey began in the late nine- teenth century within the framework of modernization movements. Along with the early Republican period, modernization was treated as a nation-state policy and housing was evaluated as a spatial expression of cultural change in the process of creating the new Turkey. This was a period of transformation in which the tra- ditional culture of living was replaced by ‘modern housing’ discourses and ‘apart- ment’ buildings as new form of housing production. The integration of apartment buildings into urban space as symbols of modern life also led to a redefinition of social relations with the spatial experiences it brought. In this process, which continued from the 1930s to the 1980s, the media has attracted attention as an important tool in imposing the new housing concepts on Turkish society. Media contents, which undertook the mission of educating society during the modern- ization in the 1930s, was replaced by rent-oriented discourses after the populist policies, large-scale urban interventions and new housing production methods of the 1950s. In this context, the article aims to examine the change in the housing approaches in Turkey through the media contents from the 1930s to the 1980s, based on the attitude of the media to guide society, which changes parallel with the dynamics of each period.

🔖

Cite This Article

ŞAHİN, P., ŞENER, S. M. (2022). A review on changing housing approaches and media contents in Turkey: 1930-1980 period. A|Z ITU Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 2, 429–441. https://ajindex.com/articles/426346

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Aru, K.A., Gorbon, R. (1952). Lev- ent Mahallesi. Arkitekt, 9-10, 174-181.
  2. Akbulut, M. R. (1996). Kaçak yapılaşmış alanların kentle bütün- leştir¬ilebilmesi için bireysel projeler yöntemi. In L. Akkal, Ö. Ertekin, M.A. Yüzer (Eds.), Habitat’a doğru İstanbul 2020 sempozyumu bildiriler (pp.353- 366). Istanbul Technical University Architecture Faculty. Bahçesiz Ev: Ciğersiz Adam. (1934, March 21). Yedigün, 54, 22. Balamir, M. (1996). Türkiye’de ‘Apart¬kent’lerin oluşumu, mülki- yet ilişkileri¬nin dönüşümüne dayalı kentleşme. In Y. Sey (Ed.), Tarihten günümüze Anadolu’da konut ve yer- leşme (pp. 335-344).
  3. Tarih Vakfı. Batur, A., Yücel, A., Fersan, N. (1979). İstanbul’da ondokuzuncu yüzyıl sıra evleri koruma ve yeniden kullanım için bir monografik araştır- ma. Odtü Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi, 2, 185-205.
  4. Bozdoğan, S. (1996). Modern yaşa- mak: erken cumhuriyet döneminde kübik ev. In Y. Sey (Ed.), Tarihten günümüze Anadolu’da konut ve yer- leşme (pp. 313-328).
  5. Tarih Vakfı. Bozdoğan, S. (2012). Modernizm ve Ulusun İnşası (T. Birkan, Trans.). Metis Yayınları. (Original work pub- lished 2001).
  6. Emlak Bankası. (1950). Levend Ma- hallesi [Advertisement]. Arkitekt, 11- 12 (227-228), 13. Emlak Bankası. (1955, October 9). Levend Mahallesi [Advertisement]. Vatan. Emlak Bankası 500 ev yaptırıyor (1949, March 17). Akşam, p.3. Ersel, H. (2015). Kâzım Taşkent, Yapı Kredi ve kültür sanat. Yapı Kredi Yayınları. Evsan. (1970, September 17). Ha- yalinizdeki şahane daireleri sizler için hazırladık [Advertisement]. Milliyet, p.6. Görgülü, T. (2010). Türkiye’de ilk apartmandan günümüze; çok kat- lı ko¬nutlarda yaşanan dönüşümler. In H.T. Yıldız, A. Eyüce (Eds.), Kent kültür konut bildiri kitabı (pp. 90-98).
  7. Bahçeşehir Üniversitesi.
  8. Görgülü, T. (2016a). Apartman ti- polojisinde geçmişten bugüne; kira apartmanından rezidansa geçiş. Tü- ba-Ked, 14, 165-178.
  9. Görgülü, Ş. T. (2016b). Türkiye’de çok katlı konutun değişimi, apartmanın öyküsü. Alim Kitapları. Keleş, R. (1998). Kentbilim terimleri sözlüğü (2nd. ed.). İmge Ki-tabevi. Kıray, M. (1998). Kentleşme yazıları. Bağlam Yayıncılık. Küçük Apartmanlara Mahsus Eşyalar. (1934, July 18). Yedigün, 71, 17. Öncel, A. D. (2014). Apartman: Galata’da yeni bir konut tipi. Kitap Yayınevi.
  10. Özüekren, A. Ş. (1996). Kooperati¬- fler ve konut üretimi. In Y. Sey (Ed.), Tarihten günümüze Anadolu’da konut ve yerleşme (pp. 355-365). Tarih Vakfı. Profesör Behçet Sabit Beyi din¬lerken. (1934, April 11). Yedigün, 57, 7-9. Seçim yakın, af çıkacak diyen gece- kon