Journals / A|Z ITU Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi / 2021 / Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 1

Qubba of the Ksour Mountains, between material and immaterial

Pages
217–234
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

These little funerary and sacred monuments, that we see, as the product of spontaneity are in reality the product of a rigorous reflection, more complex than the current reflections, in the sense that what is taken into account is not only the material but more and in particular the immaterial.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The study of architectural shapes of funeral monuments such as the Qubbas requires a particular attention owing to their diversities and symbolic.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Describing and examining the shapes of Qubbas, looking for explanations about their differences and their locations are the objectives.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:These little funerary and sacred monuments, that we see, as the product of spontaneity are in reality the product of a rigorous reflection, more complex than the current reflections, in the sense that what is taken into account is not only the material but more and in particular the immaterial.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The study of architectural shapes of funeral monuments such as the Qubbas requires a particular attention owing to their diversities and symbolic. Describing and examining the shapes of Qubbas, looking for explanations about their differences and their locations are the objectives. Each time, the “How” will help us understand the “Why”. The analysis is typological, anthropological and axiological. We installed a duality, by putting the different criteria of analysis together within an architectural rationale to clear the types and the typologies inherent in these buildings and explain the causes of differentiations between these types. Three typologies of Qubbas were revealed. Their variability lies in the dimensional aspect, the commonly used columns, the technique of connecting the square base to the dome and finally the type of dome. This variability is due essentially to the religious characters they live in. It seems pertinent today to cease to see the architecture of Qubba in terms of spontaneous architecture. These little funerary and sacred monuments, that we see, as the product of spontaneity are in reality the product of a rigorous reflection, more complex than the current reflections, in the sense that what is taken into account is not only the material but more and in particular the immaterial.

🔖

Cite This Article

DJERADI, M. A., LAKJAA, A. (2022). Qubba of the Ksour Mountains, between material and immaterial. A|Z ITU Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 1, 217–234. https://ajindex.com/articles/426345

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (7)

  1. Angers, M. (1996). Initiation pratique à la méthodologie de sciences humaines. Quebec: CEC inc Aymonino, C. (1966). La città di Padova, sagiio di analisi urbana. Rome: Officina. Bachelard, G. (1957). La poétique de l’espace. Paris: PUF. Bachminski, J., Grandet, D. (1985). Éléments d’architecture et d’urbanisme traditionnels. Oran: Ronéo. Basset, R. (1937). Les ksours berbérophones du Gourara. Revue Africaine, (3), 134-161.
  2. Beaud, S., Weber, F. (2003). Guide de l’enquête de terrain. Paris: La Découverte. Bellil, R. (2003). Ksour et saints du Gourara, dans la tradition orale, l’hagiographie et les chroniques orales. Alger: Centre National de Recherche Préhistorique, Anthropologique et Historique. Berbrugger, A. (1864). L’Algérie historique. Pittoresque et monumentale. Paris: Delahaye. Berque, J. (1982). Ulémas, fondateurs insurgés au Maghreb. Paris: Sindbad. Bertaux, D. (1980). L’approche biographique: sa validité méthodologique. Cahiers Internationaux de Sociologie. 197-225
  3. Berthier, N. (2006). Les techniques d’enquête en sciences sociales. Paris: Armand Colin. Bourouiba, R. (1981). L’art religieux musulman en Algérie. Alger: SNED. Burckhardt, T. (1976). L’art de l’Islam. Paris: Sindbad. Burlot, J. (1990). La civilisation islamique. Paris: Hachette. Brosselard, C. (2013). Les Khouan. De la constitution des ordres religieux musulmans. Paris: Hachette. Codrington, R. H. (1891). The Melanesians: Studies in their Anthropology and Folk Lore. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  4. Combessie, J. C. (2007). La méthode en sociologie. Paris: La découverte. Cominardi, F. (1994). Au coeur des monts des Ksours: Le qsar de Chellala Dahrania. Habitat tradition et modernité, (2), 45-66.
  5. Coppolani, X., Depontg, O. (1897). Les confréries religieuses musulmanes. Alger: Jourdan. Courtin, E., Lechaux, B., Roullaud, É., & Woollven, M. (2012). Démêler les fils du récit comparatif, Revue Internationale de Politique Comparée, (19), 7-17.
  6. De Foucauld, C. (1940). Dictionnaire des Touaregs, dialectes de l’Ahaggar. Paris: Larose. Deffontaines, P. (1940). Géographie et religion. Paris: Gallimard. Dermenghem, E. (1954). Le culte des saints dans l’islam maghrébin. Paris: Gallimard. Detienne, M. (1994). Tracé de fondation. Paris: Albin Michel. Djeradi, M.A. (2012-13). L’architecture ksourienne (Algérie) entre signes et signifiants. L’architecture vernaculaire, (36-37).
  7. Djeradi, M.A. (2020). Enquête sur la typologie des Qubbas. https://docs. google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSckEohq4sk6b9TK