Journals / A|Z ITU Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi / 2021 / Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 2

Determination of Syrians re- making home interiors through visual research methods: The Sultanbeyli case

Pages
383–396
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Because of this, it is crucial to conduct new re- search studies with participant groups to follow the changes that take place over time

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:One of the most important problems of Syrians subjected to forced migration since 2011 is obtaining shelter.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This study explores how displaced Syrians living in Sultanbeyli, a district in Istanbul, Turkey, are re-making their home interiors.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Because of this, it is crucial to conduct new re- search studies with participant groups to follow the changes that take place over time
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2011 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

One of the most important problems of Syrians subjected to forced migration since 2011 is obtaining shelter. This study explores how displaced Syrians living in Sultanbeyli, a district in Istanbul, Turkey, are re-making their home interiors. Syrians in Sultanbeyli are transforming their residences, especially indoors, based on their physical and psychological needs and cultural habits. This paper begins with a brief introduction followed by background information about such related concepts as “house,” “home,” and “home-making,” and home re-making practices in the context of forced migration. The Sultanbeyli case is then explored. Sultan- beyli is chosen as a study area because it maintains a supportive living environ- ment for displaced Syrians. The case study was conducted with Syrian families of middle or lower income groups in their home environment. The method of the study was based on visual research methods, including the use of photographs, drawings, physical traces and annotated diagrams. Data were obtained regarding family structure and composition, lifestyle, activities, spatial use and organiza- tion, and furniture layout. The findings show that social, cultural, and behavioral codes have an important role in home re-making processes and practices. They also show that the supportive relationship between people and their living envi- ronment has an effect on developing a sense of belonging and place attachment. More specifically, they show that a supportive living environment also enhances cultural hybridization over time. Because of this, it is crucial to conduct new re- search studies with participant groups to follow the changes that take place over time

🔖

Cite This Article

CORDAN, Ö., AKTAN, T. Ö. (2022). Determination of Syrians re- making home interiors through visual research methods: The Sultanbeyli case. A|Z ITU Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 2, 383–396. https://ajindex.com/articles/426344

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (4)

  1. Al-Ali, N., & Koser, K. (2001). New approaches to migration: Transnational communities and the transformation of home. Routledge. Altman, I. (1975). The environment and social behavior. Brooks/Cole Pub- lishing Company. Altman, I., Rapoport, A., & Wohl- will, J.F. (1980). Human behavior and environment: Advances in theory and re- search; Volume 4: Environment and Cul- ture. Springer Science+Business Media. Antonsich, M. (2010). Searching for belonging; An analytical frame- work. Geography Compass, 4(6), 644- 659. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749- 8198.2009.00317.x Anton, C. E., & Lawrence, C. (2014). Home is where the heart is: The effect of place of residence on place attach- ment and community participation. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 40, 451–461. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. jenvp.2014.10.007 Biner, Ö.& Soykan, C. (2016). Su- riyeli mültecilerin perspektifinden Tür- kiye’de yaşam (Life in the perspective of Syrian refugees in Turkey). Mültecilerle Dayanışma Derneği Yayınları (Publi- cation of Association of Solidarity with Refugees). Boccagni, P., & Brighenti, A.M. (2015). Immigrants and home in the making: Thresholds of domesticity, commonality and publicness. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 32, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10901- 015-9487-9
  2. Boccagni, P. (2020). At home in the centre? Spatial appropriation and hori- zons of home making in reception fa- cilities for asylum seekers. HOMInG Working Paper no10_2020.
  3. Boccagni, P., Murcia, L.E.P., & Bel- loni, M. (2020). Thinking home on the move: A conversation across disciplines. Emerland Publishing. DGMM; a [Republic of Turkey Min- istery of Interior-Directorate General of Migration Management]. (2020). Temporary Protection Regulation. Re- trieved from https://www.goc.gov.tr/ gecici-koruma-kanunu-ve-yonetmeli- gi DGMM; b [Republic of Turkey Min- istery of Interior-Directorate General of Migration Management]. (2020). Temporary Protection Statistics. Re- trieved from https://www.goc.gov.tr/ gecici-koruma5638 Dovey, K. (1985). Home and home- lessness, human behavior and envi- ronment: Advances in theory and re- search. In I. Altman & C. M. Werner (Eds.), Home Environments (pp.33-64). Springer Science+Business Media. Erdoğan, M.M. (2017).
  4. Kopuştan uyuma kent mültecileri, Suriyeli mülte- ciler ve belediyelerin süreç yönetimi: İstanbul örneği. [Urban refugees from “detachment” to “harmonization”, Syr- ian refugees and process management of municipalities: The case of Istanbul]. Marmara