Journals / A|Z ITU Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi / 2021 / Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 1

A review of LEED green building certification systems in Europe and Turkey

Pages
115–126
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Based on the above, it was concluded that the performance of LEED certified buildings in Turkey were poorer than in Europe especially in energy.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study reviews LEED green building certification system which is used most widely in Turkey and in the world.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Additionally, the LEED green building certification system criteria which were met by more than 150 buildings to obtain the certification were listed and the percentages of the criteria that were met in Europe and in Turkey were determined.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Based on the above, it was concluded that the performance of LEED certified buildings in Turkey were poorer than in Europe especially in energy.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This study reviews LEED green building certification system which is used most widely in Turkey and in the world. A LEED green building certificate can be obtained by meeting different criteria of the review system and therefore each LEED certified building can have different features. This study reviewed all new buildings in Europe and Turkey, which have LEED Gold certificates. Additionally, the LEED green building certification system criteria which were met by more than 150 buildings to obtain the certification were listed and the percentages of the criteria that were met in Europe and in Turkey were determined. Based on these percentages, the criteria that were mostly preferred and those that were not generally avoided by certified buildings were shown. And by comparing these percentages the most important differences between in Turkey and Europe were identified and the reasons for these differences were investigated. Based on the above, it was concluded that the performance of LEED certified buildings in Turkey were poorer than in Europe especially in energy. Although they have the same certification levels, green buildings in Europe are more energy efficient than those in Turkey. In areas such as brownfield redevelopment, light pollution caused by the building, use of certified wood, low VOC (volatile organic compounds) content in floorings and occupant line of sight, buildings in Turkey lag behind the buildings in Europe. In Turkey, regulations and the education level in the industry in these areas are not up to the standards of Europe.

🔖

Cite This Article

BAŞTANOĞLU, E., AKŞİT, Ş. F. (2022). A review of LEED green building certification systems in Europe and Turkey. A|Z ITU Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 1, 115–126. https://ajindex.com/articles/426332

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (8)

  1. Adiloglu, C., Gulbeden A., Toprak, G., Unal, O. N., Oncul, S., Kibar, A., Tastekin, R., Kas, Donmezand, I., Gundogan, M. H. (2010). ESER Green Building. Middle East Technical University 1. Project and Construction Management Congress. Ankara.
  2. Aksakal, N.B. (2009). An Approach for the Design Process in Green Building Projects: LEED V4 Certification Process (Master’s Thesis). Istanbul Technical University, Architecture Department, Project and Construction Management Program, Istanbul. Aktas, B. (2013). Converting Existing Buildings to Green Buildings: Implementations In Turkey (Master’s Thesis). Bogazici University, Engineering Faculty, Istanbul. Awadh, O. (2017). Sustainability and green building rating systems: LEED, BREEAM, GSAS and Estidama critical analysis. Journal of Building Engineering, Vol 11, May 2017, pp. 25- 29. Baştanoğlu, E. (2017). Evaluation of LEED Green Building Certification System Applications:Europe and Turkey (Master’s Thesis). Istanbul Technical University, Architecture Department, Project and Construction Management Program, Istanbul. Cole, R. (2013). The importation of building environmental certification systems: international usages of BREEAM and LEED. Building Research & Information Journal, Vol 41, Issue 6, pp. 662-676.
  3. Diamond, R. (2011). Evaluating the Energy Performance of the First Generation of LEED Certified Commercial Buildings. American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy 2006 Summer Study, pp. 8-9.
  4. Gurgun, A.P., Polat, G., Damci, A., Bayhan, H.G. (2016). Performance of LEED Energy Credit Requirements in European Countries. Procedia Engineering, Vol 164, pp. 432-438.
  5. Kats, G. (2003). Green Building Costs and Financial Benefits, Capital E. Mapp, C., Nobe C., Dunbar, B. (2011). The Cost of LEED—An Analysis of the Construction Costs of LEED and Non-LEED Banks. JOSRE, Vol. 3, No. 1, p.255. Mao X., Lu H. and Li Q. (2009). A Comparison Study of Mainstream Sustainable/ Green Building Rating Tools in the World. 2009, International Conference on Management and Service Science, Wuhan, pp. 1-5.
  6. Nyikos, D. M., Thal, A.E., Hicks, M. J., Leach, S. E. (2012). To LEED or not to LEED: Analysis of Cost Premium Associated With Sustainable Facility Design. Engineering Management Journal, 24(4), 50-62.
  7. Ozcan, O., Temizbas, A. (2010). Green Building. Middle East Technical University Civil Engineering, 1. Project and Construction Management Congress, Ankara.
  8. Ozturk, A. (2015). Analysis of Green Building Certification Systems (Master’s thes