Journals / A|Z ITU Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi / 2021 / Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 2

Social capital and the spatial quality of neighborhoods: Parameters, indicators & strategies

Pages
301–318
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Based on the stated parameters, planning strategies and design criteria are recom- mended as “creating and supporting public realm” (social interaction), “resident participating in the physical space management and construction” (social partici- pation), “increasing the presence of citizens in public and open spaces” (place at- tachment), and “appropriate distribution and location of functions and amenities” (spatial equity).

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Although there is extensive literature on the issue of social capital, studies that focus on the social issues of residential neighborhoods complain about a lack of socio-physical relations in planning and design strategies.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This study aims to propose a model for increasing social capital in residential areas and suggest strategies and design criteria based on it.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Based on the stated parameters, planning strategies and design criteria are recom- mended as “creating and supporting public realm” (social interaction), “resident participating in the physical space management and construction” (social partici- pation), “increasing the presence of citizens in public and open spaces” (place at- tachment), and “appropriate distribution and location of functions and amenities” (spatial equity).
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Although there is extensive literature on the issue of social capital, studies that focus on the social issues of residential neighborhoods complain about a lack of socio-physical relations in planning and design strategies. Since social capital is one of the effective paradigms for creating social sustainability, its dimensions and parameters in neighborhoods remain questionable. This study aims to propose a model for increasing social capital in residential areas and suggest strategies and design criteria based on it. With this issue in mind, the present study applies a qualitative approach. In an attempt to identify the components and indicators of social capital, this paper primarily focuses on the developments of social capital. Then based on the analysis of theoretical studies, the development of social cap- ital indicators are defined in residential neighborhoods. As a result, the compo- nents of social capital are categorized as a) social networks, b) common values, c) norms, and d) trust. Our final four-parameter model consists of “social par- ticipation and interaction” (social dimension) and “place attachment and spatial equity” (physical dimension) based on literature review in neighborhood studies. Based on the stated parameters, planning strategies and design criteria are recom- mended as “creating and supporting public realm” (social interaction), “resident participating in the physical space management and construction” (social partici- pation), “increasing the presence of citizens in public and open spaces” (place at- tachment), and “appropriate distribution and location of functions and amenities” (spatial equity).

🔖

Cite This Article

NEZAMI, H. N., ASADPOUR, A. (2022). Social capital and the spatial quality of neighborhoods: Parameters, indicators & strategies. A|Z ITU Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 2, 301–318. https://ajindex.com/articles/426317

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (8)

  1. dhami Sayadmahaleh, Q. (2014). Explaining the Role of Public Spaces in Relation to Social Capital: Case Study of Amol City. (M.Sc.), Islamic Azad Uni- versity, Central Tehran Branch, Faculty of Art and Architecture, Tehran. Aguilar, J. P., & Sen, S. (2009). Comparing Conceptualizations of Social Capital. Journal of Com- munity Practice, 17(4), 424-443. doi:10.1080/10705420903299979. Alizadeh, H., Irandoost, K., Khos- ravanian, L., & Tavallaei, R. (2014). In- vestigating Social Capital in Three Spa- tial Layers of Sanandaj City: Informal Settlements, Old/Central and Planned Neighborhoods. Journal of Architecture and Urban Planning, 7(13), 133-149.
  2. Arneil, B. (2006). Diverse Commu- nities: The Problem with Social Capi- tal. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  3. Barati, N., & Yazdan Panah Shah Abadi, M. (2016). Evaluation of Social Capital as a Key Factor in Improving the Quality of Life in a New City, Case Study: Pardis New City. Armanshahr Architecture & Urban Development, 8(15), 289-299.
  4. Bashar, T., & Bramley, G. (2019). Social capital and neighborhood co- operation: Implications for devel- opment of the urban poor in LDCs. Urban Studies, 56(13), 2727-2745. doi:10.1177/0042098018797945. Brehm, J., & Rahn, W. (1997). Indi- vidual-Level Evidence for the Causes and Consequences of Social Capital. American journal of political science, 41(3), 999-1023. doi:10.2307/2111684. Bridger, J. C., & Alter, T. R. (2006).
  5. Place, Community Devel- opment, and Social Capital. Com- munity Development, 37(1), 5-18. doi:10.1080/15575330609490151. Brown, B. B., Altman, I., & Werner, C. M. (2012). Place Attachment. In S. J. Smith (Ed.), International Encyclopedia of Housing and Home (pp. 183-188). San Diego: Elsevier. Browning, C. R. (2009). Illumi- nating the Downside of Social Cap- al: Negotiated Coexistence, Prop- erty Crime, and Disorder in Urban Neighborhoods. American Behav- ioral Scientist, 52(11), 1556-1578. doi:10.1177/0002764209331526. Burt, R. S. (2000). The Network Structure of Social Capital. Research in organizational behavior, 22, 345-423. doi:10.1016/S0191-3085(00)22009-1.
  6. Burt, R. S. (2005). Brokerage and Closure: An Introduction to Social Capi- tal. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  7. Butler, T., & Robson, G. (2001).
  8. Social Capital, Gentrification and Neighbor- hood Change in London: A Comparison of Three South London Neighborhoods. Urban Studies, 38(12), 2145-2162. doi:10.1080/00420980120087090. Castiglione, D., van Deth, J. W., & Wolleb, G. (2008). Social Capit