Journals / A|Z ITU Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi / 2021 / Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 2

The transformative characteristics of public spaces in unplanned settlements

Pages
285–300
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The findings reveal a dynamic system of reproduction of the public spaces based on the mass-space proportions and private-public relationships with temporary, portable, and assembled components with low quality in the area.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This research aims to explore the transformative specifications of public space in unplanned settlements.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The neglected state of some urban specification, par- ticularly urban spaces is one of the current problems in cities undergoing rapid urbanization.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The findings reveal a dynamic system of reproduction of the public spaces based on the mass-space proportions and private-public relationships with temporary, portable, and assembled components with low quality in the area.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This research aims to explore the transformative specifications of public space in unplanned settlements. The neglected state of some urban specification, par- ticularly urban spaces is one of the current problems in cities undergoing rapid urbanization. Public spaces in unplanned settlements manifest the resultant of the socio-economic condition in a specific context. The research employed the qualitative method and techniques such as unobtrusive observation, photogra- phy, mapping, and graphical analysis to collect, analyze, and interpret the data. The findings reveal a dynamic system of reproduction of the public spaces based on the mass-space proportions and private-public relationships with temporary, portable, and assembled components with low quality in the area. In this regard, the transformative character of the public spaces could categorize in four types including de-form, less-form, soft-form, and anti-form spaces. The result of the research reveals that although there is a process of changing the private spaces to semi-private, paths and open spaces are more vulnerable under the pressure of users to privatize the spaces. The results of this research could help the policymak- ers and designers for real insight into the public spaces in unplanned settlements.

🔖

Cite This Article

TAFAHOMI, R., NADI, R. (2022). The transformative characteristics of public spaces in unplanned settlements. A|Z ITU Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 2, 285–300. https://ajindex.com/articles/426312

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (4)

  1. lSayyad, N. (2004). Urban infor- mality as a new way of life. In A. Roy, & N. AlSayyad (Eds.), Urban informality: Transnational perspectives from the Mid- dle East, Latin America, and South Asia (pp. 7-30). New York: Lexington Books. Avni, N., & Yiftachel, O. (2014). The new divided city? Planning and ‘gray space’ between global north-west and south-east. In S. Parnell, & S. Oldfield (Eds.), The Routledge handbook on cities of the global south (pp. 487-505). New York: Routledge. Bayat, A. (2004). Globalization and the politics of the informal’s in the global south. In A. Roy, & N. AlSayyad (Eds.), Urban informality: Transnational perspectives from the Middle East, Latin America, and South Asia (pp. 79-102). New York: Lexington Books. Bonnes, M., & Bonaiuto, M. (2002). Environmental psychology: From spa- tial-physical environment to sustain- able development. In R. B. Bechtle, & A. Churchman (Eds.), Handbook of en- vironment psychology (pp. 28-54). New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Bryceson, D. F. (2014). Re-evaluating the influence of urban agglomeration in sub-saharan Africa: population density, technological innovation and produc- tivity. In S. Parnell, & S. Oldfield, The Routledge handbook on cities of the glob- al south (pp. 75-85). London: Routledge. Buckley, R., & Kallergis, A. (2014). Does African urban policy provide a platform for sustained economic growth? In S. Parnell, & S. Oldfield, The Routledge handbook on cities of the global south (pp. 173-190). London: Routledge. Burton, E., & Mitchell, L. (2006). In- clusive urban design: Streets for life. Lon- don: Architectural Press.
  2. Carmona, M., Heath, T., Oc, T., & Tiesdell, S. (2003). Public places- urban spaces: The dimensions of urban design. London: Architectural Press.
  3. Charmaz, K. (2006). Construct- ing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. London: SAGE Publications. Deming, E. M., & Swaffield, S. (2011). Landscape architecture research: Inquiry, strategy, design. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Dringelis, L., Ramanauskas, E., Po- vilaitienė, I., & Mačiukėnaitė, J. (2015). Exploration and expectation of the spa- tial structure of cities, towns, townships, and villages as a significant formant of their identity. Journal of Architecture and Urbanism, 39(1), 79-100.
  4. Georgoula, O., Stamnas, A., Patias, P., Georgiadis, C., & Fragkoulidou, V. (2013). Historical coastal urban land- scapes digital documentation and temporal study with 2D/3D modeling functionality: The ca