SavedAdd your journal

Journals / A|Z ITU Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi / 2022 / Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 1

Evaluation of the location choice of software industry in Istanbul based on the types of economy

Suheda KOSE
Ayse Lale BERKOZ
Pages
169–182
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results of this study will be a guide to the potential that will lead to the creative economy’s growth in Istanbul’s future plans

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:One of the main fields of economic growth in developing countries is the software industry, which is one of the innovative industries.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Istanbul has a great potential for software creation with its artistic potential, its unique cultural heritage, social networks, and engagement.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results of this study will be a guide to the potential that will lead to the creative economy’s growth in Istanbul’s future plans
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

One of the main fields of economic growth in developing countries is the software industry, which is one of the innovative industries. Istanbul has a great potential for software creation with its artistic potential, its unique cultural heritage, social networks, and engagement. The purpose of this article is to explore the clustering pattern of Istanbul’s software industry and the choice of location from a spatial perspective, based on the types of economy. Three important conclusions have been reached by studying the spatial activity trends of the industry. Results include: (i) the software industry has a polycentric cluster pattern in the historical city center axis, (ii) a seat for the technological parks of particularly prestigious Universities in the center, and (iii) a chosen location in the center of town to benefit from the artistic industry. The results of this study will be a guide to the potential that will lead to the creative economy’s growth in Istanbul’s future plans

🔖

Cite This Article

KOSE, S., BERKOZ, A. L. (2022). Evaluation of the location choice of software industry in Istanbul based on the types of economy. A|Z ITU Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 1, 169–182. https://ajindex.com/articles/426305

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Anselin, L. (1999). Interactive Techniques and Exploratory Spatial Data Analysis. Longley P.A.,Goodchild M.F., Maguire D.J., Wind D.W. (Eds.). Geographical Information Systems: Principles, Techniques, Management and Applications. New York:Wiley. Arauzo-Carod, J-M. (2013). Location determinants of new firms: does skill level of human capital really matter?. Growth and Change, 44(1), 118- 148. Asheim, B. (2007). Differentiated Knowledge Bases and Varieties of Regional Innovation Systems. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 20(3), 223-24.
  2. Atkinson, R. D. (1998). Technological Change and Cities. Cityscape: A Journal of Policy Development and Research, 3(3), 129-170.
  3. Berköz, L., Türk, Ş.Ş. (2007). Yabancı yatırımların yerseçimini etkileyen faktörler: Türkiye örneği. A|Z ITU Journal of the Faculty of Architecture,6(2), 59-72.
  4. Boschma, R. (2005). Proximity and Innovation: A Critical Assessment. Regional Studies, 39(1), 61-74.
  5. Broekel, T., Boschma, R. (2016). The cognitive and geographical structure of knowledge links and how they influence firms’ innovation performance. Regional Statistics, 6(2), 3-26.
  6. Campbell-Kelly, M., Danilevsky, M., Garcia-Swartz D.D., Pederson S. (2010). Clustering in the Creative Industries: Insights from the Origins of Computer Software. Industry and Innovation, 17(3), 309-329.
  7. Castells, M., Hall, P. (1994). Technopoles of the World. New York: Routledge Cruz, S., Teixeira, A.C. (2014). The Determinants of Spatial Location of Creative Industries Start-Ups: Evidence from Portugal using a Discrete Choice Model Approach. Paper presented at FEP Working Papers, Porto. Cunningham, S. (2002). From Cultural to Creative Industries: Theory, Industry and Policy Implications. Media International Australia, 102(102), 54-65.
  8. Currid, E., Williams, S. (2010). The geography of buzz: Art, culture and the social milieu in Los Angeles and New York. Journal of Economic Geography, 10(3), 423–451.
  9. Davids, M., Frenken, K. (2017). Proximity, knowledge base and the innovation process: towards an integrated framework. Regional Studies, 52(3), 1-12
  10. DCMS (2019). DCMS Sector Economic Estimates. London:DCMS DeVol, R. C., Klowden, K., Bedroussian, A., Yeo, B. (2009). North America’s high-tech economy: The geography of knowledge-based industries. Paper presented by the Milken Institute, Santa Monica. Enlil, Z. M., Evren, Y. (2010). Yaratıcı İstanbul: Yaratıcı Sektörler ve Kent. İstanbul:
  11. Bilgi Üniversitesi Yayınları.
  12. Enlil, Z. M., Evren, Y., Dince