Journals / A|Z ITU Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi / 2022 / Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 1

Implementation of government policies in the construction industry: The case of Sri Lanka

Pages
151–167
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The findings revealed that National Policy on Construction (NPC) formulated by the National Advisory Council on Construction (NACC) is the only construction policy implemented in Sri Lanka.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Public policy system of the construction industry of a country will reflect the country’s economic, political, social, and cultural status.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The study used the qualitative approach consisting of 15 expert interviews and manual content analysis was used to analyze the empirical data collected through the interviews.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The findings revealed that National Policy on Construction (NPC) formulated by the National Advisory Council on Construction (NACC) is the only construction policy implemented in Sri Lanka.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Public policy system of the construction industry of a country will reflect the country’s economic, political, social, and cultural status. In any country, especially in developing countries like Sri Lanka, the success of government policies depends on their effective implementation. Thus, the aim of this study was to explore how construction related government policies could be effectively implemented to facilitate the development of the construction industry of Sri Lanka. The study used the qualitative approach consisting of 15 expert interviews and manual content analysis was used to analyze the empirical data collected through the interviews. The findings revealed that National Policy on Construction (NPC) formulated by the National Advisory Council on Construction (NACC) is the only construction policy implemented in Sri Lanka. NPC, which contains 18 policies applicable to both public and private sectors, is found to be sufficient for the effective operation of the construction industry for the time being. However, the proper implementation of the policy could be a challenge given the nature of the country’sconstruction industry. The implementation of the policies gets interrupted when there are financial issues, insufficient human and technical resources, political influence, poor delegation of authority, and ineffective leadership. If therecommendations made in the study to overcome the barriers for policy implementation could be implemented, the country’s construction industry would develop rapidly.

🔖

Cite This Article

MENDIS, A. P. K. D., JAYATUNGE, D. A. S. R., DISARATNA, V., PERERA, B. A. K. S. (2022). Implementation of government policies in the construction industry: The case of Sri Lanka. A|Z ITU Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 1, 151–167. https://ajindex.com/articles/426299

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Adeleke, A. Q., Bahaudin, A. Y., & Kamaruddeen, A. M. (2017). Organizational internal factors and construction risk management among Nigerian construction companies. Global Business Review, 19(4), 921–938. https:// doi.org/10.1177/0972150916677460 Adnan, H., Hashim, N., Yusuwan, N. M., & Ahmad, N. (2012). Ethical issues in the construction industry: Contractor’s perspective. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 35, 719–727. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.02.142
  2. Alaghbari, W., Al-Sakkaf, A. A., & Sultan, B. (2019). Factors affecting construction labour productivity in Yemen. International Journal of Construction Management, 19(1), 79–91. https://doi. org/10.1080/15623599.2017.1382091
  3. Anderson, J. E. (2010). Public policy making - An introduction (7th ed.). Wadsworth. Azungah, T. (2018). Qualitative research: Deductive and inductive approaches to data analysis. Qualitative Research Journal. https://doi. org/10.1108/qrj-d-18-00035
  4. Bardach, E. (1977). The implementa tion game. University of Chicago Press.
  5. Berg, B. L. (2009). Qualitative research methods for the social sciences. Allyn & Bacon. Bertaux, D. (1981). From the life-history approach to the transformation of sociological practice. In Biography and society: The life history approach in the social sciences (pp. 29–45).
  6. SAGE Publications. Bosch, G., & Philips, P. (2003). Building chaos: An international comparison of deregulation in the construc tion industry (1st ed.). Routledge. Bourdeau, L. (1999). Sustainable development and the future of construction: A comparison of visions from various countries. Building Research & Information, 27(6), 354–366. https:// doi.org/10.1080/096132199369183 Bridgman, P., & Davis, G. (2004). Australian policy handbook. NSW: Allen & Unwin. Brinkerhoff, D. W., & Crosby, B. L. (2002). Managing policy reform. Ku marian Press.
  7. Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications. Drewer, S. (1980). Construction and development: A new perspective. Habitat International, 5(3), 395– 428. https://doi.org/10.1016/0197- 3975(80)90028-4
  8. Etikan, I., Musa, S. A., & Alkassim, R. S. (2016). Comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling. American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics, 5(1), 1–4. https:// doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtas.20160501.11 Fox, W., Bayat, S., & Ferriera, N. (2006).
  9. Introduction. In W. Fox, S. Bayat, & N. Ferriera (Eds.), A guide to managing public policy (pp. ix-