Journals / A|Z ITU Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi / 2022 / Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 1

An enabling technique for describing experiences in architectural environments

Pages
1–21
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Considering the data obtained through this technique during an architectural or landscape design may result in places capable of generating positive human experiences.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Experience is everything that appears to consciousness during the encounter of a human being with an environment.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The Environmental Description Survey is an enabling technique in which participants first comment about their experiences by completing a series of sentences, e.g., related to their liking for some architectural element (qualitative part of the survey), and then they are asked to rate their experiences in a 1–10 scale; e.g., How much do you like that architectural element? (quantitative part).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Considering the data obtained through this technique during an architectural or landscape design may result in places capable of generating positive human experiences.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Experience is everything that appears to consciousness during the encounter of a human being with an environment. A survey that helps people introspect about their place experience and capture that experience through words will be pre sented. The Environmental Description Survey is an enabling technique in which participants first comment about their experiences by completing a series of sentences, e.g., related to their liking for some architectural element (qualitative part of the survey), and then they are asked to rate their experiences in a 1–10 scale; e.g., How much do you like that architectural element? (quantitative part). The survey is answered after the participants have made an exploratory itinerary in the environment but still being in that environment. The most frequent experiences presented to 35 participants who visited an architecturally relevant area of the Santa Lucía Riverwalk in Monterrey, Mexico, were discovered through the survey. In addition to the frequency of the commented experiences, the quantitative data obtained correspond to the intensity of the experiences, the personal importance they had for the participants, and the chronological order in which they were presented during the visit to the place. The results obtained through the survey reveal the possibilities of experience that an architectural environment can generate in people. The hybrid technique presented also allows to discover the more relevant aspects of a place related to environmental preferences. Considering the data obtained through this technique during an architectural or landscape design may result in places capable of generating positive human experiences.

🔖

Cite This Article

SUÁREZ, L. A. D. L. F. (2022). An enabling technique for describing experiences in architectural environments. A|Z ITU Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 1, 1–21. https://ajindex.com/articles/426297

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Ayataç, H., İnce, E.C., Türer Başkaya, F.A., Kürkçüoğlu, E., Çelik. Ö., & Becerik Altındiş, S. (2020). Evaluating visitors’ perceptions of squares: Evidence from Istanbul. A|Z ITU Journal of the Faculty of Architecture, 17(1), 1-11.
  2. Bitbol, M., & Petitmengin, C. (2013). A Defense of Introspection from Within. Constructivist Foundations, 8(3), 269-279.
  3. Boden, Z., Larkin, M., & Iyer, M. (2019). Picturing ourselves in the world: Drawings, interpretative phenomenological analysis and the rela tional mapping interview. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 16(2), 218-236.
  4. Borg, I., & Groenen, P.J.F. (2005).
  5. Modern Multidimensional Scaling, Theory and Applications. New York: Springer. Borji, A., Sihite, D.N., & Itti, L. (2013). Quantitative Analysis of Human-Model Agreement in Visual Sa liency Modeling: A Comparative Study. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 22(1), 55-69.
  6. Calway, B.A., & Sykes, J.A. (1996). Grammatical Conversion of De scriptive Narrative - an application of discourse analysis in conceptual modelling. Australasian Journal of In formation Systems, 3(2), 10-19.
  7. Cele, S. (2006). Communicating Place: Methods for Understanding Children’s Experience of Place. Stockholm: Stockholm University. Chandler, J., & Owen, M. (2002). Developing Brands with Qualitative Market Research. London: SAGE. Coburn, A., Vartanian, O., Kenett, Y.N., Nadal, M., Hartung, F., Hayn-Leichsenring, G., Navarrete, G., González-Mora, J.L., & Chatterjee, A. (2020). Psychological and neural responses to architectural interiors. CORTEX, 126, 217-241. Dall’Alba, G. (2000). Reflections on some faces of phenomenography. In J.A. Bowden & E. Walsh (Eds.), Phenomenography (pp. 83-101). Melbourne: RMIT University Press.
  8. Daly, S.R., Adams, R.S., & Bodner, G.M. (2012). What Does it Mean to Design? A Qualitative Investigation of Design Professionals’ Experiences. Journal of Engineering Education, 101(2), 187-219.
  9. De Matteis, F., Bille, M., Griffero T., & Jelić A. (2019). Phenomenographies: describing the plurality of atmospheric worlds. Ambiances, 5, 1-22. de la Fuente Suárez, L.A. (2012). Arquitectura: el diseño de una experiencia [Architecture: The Design of an Experience] (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya BarcelonaTech, Spain. de la Fuente Suárez, L.A. (2013). Architecture: the design of an experience / Architektūra: patirties projektavimas. Limes: Borderland Studies, 6(1), 1-20. de la Fuente Suárez, L.A. (2016). The immaterial and atmospheric in ar