Journals / Zeynep Kamil medical journal (Online) / 2021 / Cilt: 52 - Sayı: 2

Evaluation of etiological, laboratory, and anthropometric characteristics of patients treated with the diagnosis of precocious puberty

Pages
96–101
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

GnRH analog treatment may contribut

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: This study aimed to determine the etiological distribution of patients treated for precocious puberty and to compare the results of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) analog treatment with clinical and laboratory data during the administration and follow-up period.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Material and Methods: The files of patients treated with a diagnosis of precocious puberty between October 2016 and July 2019 in the pediatric endocrinology outpatient clinic were retrospectively analyzed.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:GnRH analog treatment may contribut
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2016 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to determine the etiological distribution of patients treated for precocious puberty and to compare the results of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) analog treatment with clinical and laboratory data during the administration and follow-up period. Material and Methods: The files of patients treated with a diagnosis of precocious puberty between October 2016 and July 2019 in the pediatric endocrinology outpatient clinic were retrospectively analyzed. Results: While 39 (88.6%) of our patients with precocious puberty were female, five (11.4%) were male. True precocious puberty (TPP) was found in 42 patients (95.5%) and combined precocious puberty (CPP) in two patients (4.5%). While 37 (88.1%) of TPP patients were diagnosed with idiopathic precocious puberty, an organic cause was found in five patients. Both of the patients treated for CPP had late-onset congenital adrenal hyperplasia. The mean estimated adult height (EAH) before the treatment was 151.88±6.77 cm in our patients between the ages of 6 and 8 who were started on GnRH analog treatment with a diagnosis of TPP, while the mean EAH after treatment was 155.16±7.82 cm (p<0.001). An increase in body mass index-standard deviation score was found in patients who received triptorelin acetate treatment, but no statistically significant difference was found. Conclusion: Precocious puberty is more common in girls, and idiopathic TPP constitutes the majority of cases. GnRH analog treatment may contribut

🔖

Cite This Article

BOLU, S., İŞLEYEN, F., DANIŞ, A. (2022). Evaluation of etiological, laboratory, and anthropometric characteristics of patients treated with the diagnosis of precocious puberty. Zeynep Kamil medical journal (Online), Cilt: 52 - Sayı: 2, 96–101. https://ajindex.com/articles/426151

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Teilmann G, Pedersen CB, Jensen TK, Skakkebæk NE, Juul A. Prevalence and incidence of precocious pubertal development in Denmark: An epidemiologic study based on national registries. Pediatrics 2005;116(6):1323–8
  2. Euling SY, Selevan SG, Pescovitz OH, Skakkebaek NE. Role of environmental factors in the timing of puberty. Pediatrics 2008;121(3):167–71
  3. Kaplowitz P, Bloch C. Evaluation and referral of children with signs of early puberty. Pediatrics 2016;137(1):e20153732
  4. Jung MK, Song KC, Kwon AR, Chae HW, Kim DH, Kim HS. Adult height in girls with central precocious puberty treated with gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist with or without growth hormone. Ann Pediatr Endocrinol Metab 2014;19(4):214–9
  5. Bundak R, Furman A, Gunoz H, Darendeliler F, Bas F, Neyzi O. Body mass index references for Turkish children. Acta Paediatr 2006;95(2):194–8
  6. Kandemir N, Demirbilek H, Özön ZA, Gönç N, Alikaşifoğlu A. GnRH stimulation test in precocious puberty: Single sample is adequate for diagnosis and dose adjustment. J Clin Res Pediatr Endocrinol 2011;3(1):12–7
  7. Mogensen SS, Aksglaede L, Mouritsen A, Sørensen K, Main KM, Gideon P, et al. Diagnostic work-up of 449 consecutive girls who were referred to be evaluated for precocious puberty. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2011;96(5):1393–401
  8. Tirumuru SS, Arya P, Latthe P. Understanding precocious puberty in girls. Obstet Gynaecol 2012;14(2):121–9
  9. Rohani F, Salehpur S, Saffari F. Etiology of precocious puberty, 10 years study in Endocrine Reserch Centre (Firouzgar), Tehran. Iran J Reprod Med 2012;10(1):1–6
  10. Shiva S, Fayyazi A, Melikian A, Shiva S. Causes and types of precocious puberty in North-West Iran. Iran J Pediatr 2012;22(4):487
  11. Kılınç S. Assessment of normal, normal variants, and precocious puberty in children referred with signs of early pubertal development to a pediatric endocrine unit. Haydarpasa Numune Med J 2019;59(1):71–7
  12. Lee J, Kim J, Yang A, Cho SY, Jin DK. Etiological trends in male central precocious puberty. Ann Pediatr Endocrinol Metab 2018;23(2):75–80
  13. Carel JC, Lahlou N, Roger M, Chaussain JL. Precocious puberty and statural growth. Hum Reprod Update 2004;10(2):135–47
  14. Rapaport R, Logrono R. Primary empty sella syndrome in childhood: Association with precocious puberty. Clin Pediatr (Phila) 1991;30(8):466–71
  15. Deng X, Li W, Luo Y, Liu S, Wen Y, Liu Q. Association between small fetuses and puberty timing: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Environ R