SavedAdd your journal

Journals / 7tepe Klinik / 2018 / Cilt: 14 - Sayı: 2

Assessment of tensile strength between base-repair materials and porcelain teeth subjected to different surface treatment

Farklı yüzey işlemi uygulanan porselen dişler ve kaide-tamir materyalleri arasındaki gerilme kuvvetinin değerlendirilmesi

Murat ALKURT
Mustafa GÜNDOĞDU
Zeynep YEŞİL DUYMUŞ
Pages
91–96
Publication Date
2022-09-03
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The lowest tensile bond strength was determined control group (6.38 MPa) of auto-polymerizing (AP).Surface treatments showed no significant difference.Conclusion: Superior tensile strength was found polyamidedenture base and different surface treatments not affect thetensile strength of porcelain teeth.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: The purpose of study is to assess the tensile strengthbetween porcelain teeth and two different denture base (polyamide and heat-polymerized acrylic), a repair material (auto-polymerizing acrylic) after different types of surface treatment.Materials and Methods: Total of 63 same form and colormandibular right first molar porcelain denture teeth wereused.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The first molar porcelain denture teeth were separatedinto 3 material groups; Group 1: Heat-polymerized (HP), Group2: Autopolymerizing (AP), and Group 3: Polyamide (PA) (n=21).Then, all material groups were divided into 3 subgroups (n=7)representing different surface treatment method; Control, Airborne abrasion, Er: YAG laser.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The lowest tensile bond strength was determined control group (6.38 MPa) of auto-polymerizing (AP).Surface treatments showed no significant difference.Conclusion: Superior tensile strength was found polyamidedenture base and different surface treatments not affect thetensile strength of porcelain teeth.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Aim: The purpose of study is to assess the tensile strengthbetween porcelain teeth and two different denture base (polyamide and heat-polymerized acrylic), a repair material (auto-polymerizing acrylic) after different types of surface treatment.Materials and Methods: Total of 63 same form and colormandibular right first molar porcelain denture teeth wereused. The first molar porcelain denture teeth were separatedinto 3 material groups; Group 1: Heat-polymerized (HP), Group2: Autopolymerizing (AP), and Group 3: Polyamide (PA) (n=21).Then, all material groups were divided into 3 subgroups (n=7)representing different surface treatment method; Control, Airborne abrasion, Er: YAG laser. A universal testing machine wasused for determining the tensile bond strength (MPa) of theporcelain denture teeth to surface treated denture base andrepair materials. The crosshead speed was set of 0.5 mm/min.Two-way ANOVA and post-hoc Tukey’s HSD was used for statically analyses (α=0.05). The effects of the surface treatmentwere observed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM).Results: The polyamide (PA) has significantly higher(p< 0.05) tensile bond strength than the Heat-polymerized(HP) and Auto-polymerizing acrylic (AP). Polyamide (PA) withlaser surface treatment (9.89 MPa) showed highest tensilebond strength. The lowest tensile bond strength was determined control group (6.38 MPa) of auto-polymerizing (AP).Surface treatments showed no significant difference.Conclusion: Superior tensile strength was found polyamidedenture base and different surface treatments not affect thetensile strength of porcelain teeth.

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı, porselen protez dişelere uygulanan farklı yüzey işlemlerinden sonra iki farklı protez kaide (poliamid ve ısı ile polimerize akrilik) ve tamir materyali (otopolimerize akrilik) ile arasındaki gerilme kuvvetini değerlendirmektir. Gereç ve Yöntem: Bu çalışmada 63 adet aynı şekil ve renk mandibular sağ birinci molar porselen protez dişleri kullanıldı. Birinci molar porselen protez dişler 3 materyal grubuna ayrıldı; Grup 1: Isı polimerizasyonu (HP), Grup 2: Otopolimerize akrilik (AP) ve Grup 3: Poliamid (PA) (n=21). Daha sonra, tüm poselen dişler yüzey işleme yöntemine göre 3 alt gruba ayrıldı; Kontrol, Kumlama, Er: YAG lazer. Gerilme kuvveti (MPa) universal test makinesi kullanılarak (0.5 mm/dak) tespit edildi. Gerilme değerlerinin ortalama ve standart sapması hesaplandı ve tüm veriler two-way ANOVA ve post-hoc Tukey HSD ile analiz edildi. Güven aralığı α=0.05 olarak belirlendi. Yüzey işlemlerinin etkileri taramalı elektron mikroskobu (SEM) ile incelendi. Bulgular: Poliamid kaide materyali diğer materyallere göre önemli derecede yüksek gerilme değeri sağladı (p 0,05). Sonuç: En fazla gerilme kuvveti poliamid kaide materyalinde bulunmuştur. Farklı yüzey uygulamalarının porselen dişlerin gerilme değerlerini etkilemediği görülmüştür.

🔖

Cite This Article

ALKURT, M., GÜNDOĞDU, M., DUYMUŞ, Z. Y. (2022). Assessment of tensile strength between base-repair materials and porcelain teeth subjected to different surface treatment. 7tepe Klinik, Cilt: 14 - Sayı: 2, 91–96. https://ajindex.com/articles/426077

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Matthews E, Smith DC. Nylon as a denture base material. Br Dent J 1955; 98: 231-237. Watt DM. Clinical assessment of nylon as a partial denture base material. Br Dent J 1955; 98: 238-244.
  2. Hallett GEM, Farrell JH. Nylon denture base. Dent Pract 1956; 6: 239-240. Hargreaves AS. Nylon as a denture-base material. Dent Pract Dent Rec 1971; 22: 122-128.
  3. Stafford GD, Huggett R, MacGregor AR, Graham J. The use of nylon as a denture-base material. J Dent 1986; 14: 18-22. Parvizi A et. al. Comparison of the dimensional accuracy of injection-molded denture base materials to that of conventional pressure-pack acrylic resin. J Prosthodont 2004; 13: 83-89.
  4. Yunus N, Rashid AA, Azmi LL, Abu-Hassan MI. Some flexural properties of a nylon denture base polymer. J Oral Rehabil 2005; 32: 65-71. Katsumata Y et. al. Mechanical characterization of a flexible nylon denture base material. Bull Kanagawa Dent Col 2007; 35: 177-182.
  5. MacGregor AR, Graham J, Stafford GD, Huggett R. Recent experiences with denture polymers. J Dent 1984; 12: 146-157.
  6. Yunus N, Rashid AA, Azmi LL, Abu-Hassan MI. Some flexural properties of a nylon denture base polymer. J Oral Rehabil 2005; 32: 65-71. Craig RG. Prosthetic appliance of polymers. In: Robert G. Craig, John M. Powers, editors. Restorative Dental Materials. 11th ed. St Louis; CV Mosby, 2002. p. 570-571.
  7. Darbar UR, Huggett R, Harrison A. Denture fracture-a survey. Br Dent J 1994; 176: 342-345.
  8. Sumithra N, Waknine S, Schulman A. Bond strength of etched porcelain denture teeth of PMMA. Quintessence Int 1986; 17: 745-748.
  9. Paffenbarger GC, Sweeney WT, Bowen RL. Bonding porcelain teeth to acrylic resin denture bases. J Am Dent Assoc 1967; 74: 1018-1023.
  10. Moffa JP, Jenkins WA, Weaver RG. Silane bonding of porcelain denture teeth to acrylic resin denture bases. J Prosthet Dent 1975; 33: 620-627.
  11. Marchack BW, Yu Z, Zhao XY, White SN. Adhesion of denture tooth porcelain to heat-polymerized denture resin. J Prosthet Dent 1995; 74: 242-249.
  12. Rached RN, Del-Bel Cury AA. Heat-cured acrylic resin repaired with microwave-cured one: bond strength and surface texture. J Oral Rehabil 2001; 28: 370-375.
  13. Vallittu PK, Lassila VP, Lappalainen R. Wetting the repair surface with methyl methacrylate affects the transverse strength of repaired heat-polymerized resin. J Prosthet Dent 1994; 72: 639-643.
  14. Shen C, Colaizzi FA, Birns B. Strength of denture repairs as influenced by surface treatment. J Prosthet Dent 1984; 52: 844-848.
  15. Rached RN, Powers JM, Del Bel Cury AA. Repair s