SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Molecular Imaging and Radionuclide Therapy / 2022 / Cilt: 31 - Sayı: 2

“Picture-in-Picture” Artifact in Post-therapeutic 131 I Whole-body Survey: Deceiving Spot View but Unraveling Whole-body Scanning

Tedavi Sonrası 131 I Tüm Vücut Taramada “Resim-İçinde-Resim” Artefaktı: Spot Görüntülemedeki Yanıltıcılığın Tüm Vücut Görüntülemede Ortaya Çıkarılması

Reyhane Ahmadi
Mohsen Qutbi
Pages
142–144
Publication Date
2022-09-03
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In this note, we intend to describe a new one with an interesting pattern in whole-body scanning, which is strikingly different from its pattern in static spot view, in a patient presented for post-therapeutic131 I survey after total thyroidectomy.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Artifacts originated from imaging hardware or instrumentation may be, on some occasions, confusing and peculiar to both physicians and technicians.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Various artifacts from a variety of sources have been reported.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In this note, we intend to describe a new one with an interesting pattern in whole-body scanning, which is strikingly different from its pattern in static spot view, in a patient presented for post-therapeutic131 I survey after total thyroidectomy.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Artifacts originated from imaging hardware or instrumentation may be, on some occasions, confusing and peculiar to both physicians and technicians. Various artifacts from a variety of sources have been reported. In this note, we intend to describe a new one with an interesting pattern in whole-body scanning, which is strikingly different from its pattern in static spot view, in a patient presented for post-therapeutic131 I survey after total thyroidectomy.

Özet

Görüntüleme donanımı veya enstrümantasyonundan kaynaklanan artefaktlar, bazı durumlarda kafa karıştırıcı ve hem doktorlara hem de teknisyenlere özgü olabilir. Çeşitli kaynaklardan çeşitli artefaktlar bildirilmiştir. Bu notta, total tiroidektomi ardından tedavi sonrası131 I incelemesi için başvuran bir hastada, tüm vücut taramasında statik spot görünümdeki paterninden çarpıcı şekilde farklı olan ilginç bir paterni tanımlamayı amaçlıyoruz.

🔖

Cite This Article

Ahmadi, R., Qutbi, M. (2022). “Picture-in-Picture” Artifact in Post-therapeutic 131 I Whole-body Survey: Deceiving Spot View but Unraveling Whole-body Scanning. Molecular Imaging and Radionuclide Therapy, Cilt: 31 - Sayı: 2, 142–144. https://ajindex.com/articles/425694

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (7)

  1. Qutbi M, Soltanshahi M, Gorzi SK, Shiravand Y, Edalat Haghi SM, Khosravi A, Asli IN. “Picture-in-Picture” artifact: introduction and characterization of a hitherto unrecognized imaging artifact in creating perfusion defects in myocardial perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography. Indian J Nucl Med 2021;36:69-72
  2. Qutbi M, Asadi A, Asli IN. Coexisting sources of false-positive reflux on a direct radionuclide cystography scan. J Nucl Med Technol 2019;47:177- 178
  3. IAEA Quality Control Atlas for Scintillation Camera Systems. Vienna, International Atomic Energy Agency; 2003
  4. Quality Assurance for SPECT Systems. Vienna, International Atomic Energy Agency; 2009
  5. O’Connor MK. Instrument- and computer-related problems and artifacts in nuclear medicine. Semin Nucl Med 1996;26:256-277
  6. Zanzonico P. Routine quality control of clinical nuclear medicine instrumentation: a brief review. J Nucl Med 2008;49:1114-1131
  7. ADAC Laboratories. Matador electronics overview manual, 9202-0104 Rev A. In: Vertex Matador Field Service Kit. Milpitas, CA: ADAC Laboratories; 1997