Journals / Türk Göğüs Kalp Damar Cerrahisi Dergisi / 2005 / Cilt: 13 - Sayı: 4

Jarvik 2000 destek cihazı ile sol ventrikül yükünün azaltılmasının koroner kan akımı üzerine etkisi

The effect of left ventricle unloading by the Jarvik 2000 assist device on coronary blood flow

Pages
314–319
Publication Date
2022-09-02
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Right heart pressures were not affected by increases in pump speeds and remained close to the baseline values.Conclusion: We conclude that left ventricle unloading with Jarvik 2000 pump does not compromise LV functions and affect CBF/MVO2 ratio.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Background: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of left ventricle unloading by the Jarvik 2000 axial-flow pump on coronary blood flow.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: The Jarvik 2000 pump was implanted in 10 calves using partial cardiopulmonary bypass.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Right heart pressures were not affected by increases in pump speeds and remained close to the baseline values.Conclusion: We conclude that left ventricle unloading with Jarvik 2000 pump does not compromise LV functions and affect CBF/MVO2 ratio.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2000 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Background: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of left ventricle unloading by the Jarvik 2000 axial-flow pump on coronary blood flow. Methods: The Jarvik 2000 pump was implanted in 10 calves using partial cardiopulmonary bypass. Left ventricular (LV) hemodynamics, coronary blood flow (CBF), and myocardial oxygen consumption (MVO2) were measured when the pump was operating at 8,000, 10,000 and 12,000 rpm, and the results were compared with the baseline (pump off, 0 rpm) values. Echocardiography was performed at increasing speeds to evaluate left and right ventricular dimensions and aortic valve opening.Results: No surgical or device-related complications occurred. The Jarvik 2000 significantly increased the mean and diastolic aortic pressures and resulted in narrowed pulse pressure at speeds above 10,000 rpm (p<0.05). Left ventricular end-systolic and end-diastolic pressures, pulmonary capillary wedge pressure, and LV dimensions gradually decreased at higher pump speeds. Although coronary blood flow and myocardial oxygen consumption decreased at increasing pump speeds (p<0.05), the ratio of CBF to MVO2 remained between 0.18 and 0.20 in all calves throughout the study. Right heart pressures were not affected by increases in pump speeds and remained close to the baseline values.Conclusion: We conclude that left ventricle unloading with Jarvik 2000 pump does not compromise LV functions and affect CBF/MVO2 ratio.

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışmada, sol ventrikül yükünün Jarvik 2000 aksiyal akım pompası ile azaltılmasının koroner kan akımı üzerine etkileri değerlendirildi. Çalışma planı: Jarvik 2000 pompası parsiyel kardiyopulmoner bypass yöntemi kullanılarak 10 adet buzağıya implante edildi. Pompa 8000, 10000 ve 12000 devir/dakika hızlarda çalıştırılırken sol ventrikül (LV) hemodinamik değerleri, koroner kan akımı (CBF) ve miyokard oksijen tüketimi (MVO2) ölçüldü ve bu değerler bazal değerler (pompa hızı 0 devir/dakika) ile karşılaştırıldı. Artan hızlarda sağ ve sol ventrikül boyutları ve aort kapak açıklığı ekokardiyografi ile ölçüldü.Bulgular: Cerrahi işlem ya da pompayla ilgili herhangi bir komplikasyon gelişmedi. Jarvik 2000 pompasının artan hızlarında ortalama ve diyastolik aortik basınçlar anlamlı olarak yükselirken, 10000 devir/dakikanın üzerindeki hızlarda nabız basıncı azaldı (p<0.05). Artan pompa hızlarında LV sistol ve diyastol sonu basınçları, pulmoner kapiller uç basıncı ve LV boyutları dereceli olarak azaldı. Her ne kadar artan hızlarda koroner kan akımı ve miyokard oksijen tüketimi azaldıysa da (p<0.05), CBF’nin MVO2’ye oranı çalışma boyunca tüm deneklerde 0.18 ile 0.20 arasında kaldı. Sağ kalp basınçları pompa hızındaki artışlardan etkilenmedi ve başlangıç değerlerine yakın seyretti.Sonuç: Çalışmamızda, sol ventrikül yükünün Jarvik 2000 pompası ile azaltılması sırasında LV işlevleri ve CBF/MVO2 oranı olumsuz olarak etkilenmedi.

🔖

Cite This Article

KARABAY, Ö. K., CONGER, J., FRAZIER, H., KADIPAŞAOĞLU, K., TÜZÜN, E. (2022). Jarvik 2000 destek cihazı ile sol ventrikül yükünün azaltılmasının koroner kan akımı üzerine etkisi. Türk Göğüs Kalp Damar Cerrahisi Dergisi, Cilt: 13 - Sayı: 4, 314–319. https://ajindex.com/articles/425279

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Cooley DA. Initial clinical experience with the Jarvik 200 implantable axial-flow left ventricular assist system. Circulation 2002; 105:2808-9
  2. Muller J, Wallukat G, Weng YG, Dandel M, Spiegelsberge S, Semrau S, et al. Weaning from mechanical cardiac support in patients with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy. Circulation 1997;96:542-9
  3. Frazier OH, Myers TJ, Gregoric ID, Khan T, Delgado Croitoru M, et al. Initial clinical experience with the Jarvil 2000 implantable axial-flow left ventricular assist system. Circulation 2002; 105:2855-60
  4. Macris MP, Parnis SM, Frazier OH, Fuqua JM Jr, Jarvik RK. Development of an implantable ventricular assist system. Ann Thorac Surg 1997;63:367-70
  5. Tuzun E, Eya K, Chee HK, Conger JL, Bruno NK, Frazier OH, et al. Myocardial hemodynamics, physiology, and perfusion with an axial flow left ventricular assist device in the calf. ASAIO J 2004;50:47-53
  6. Henry WL, DeMaria A, Gramiak R, King DL, Kisslo JA, Popp RL, et al. Report of the American Society of Echocardiography Committee on Nomenclature and Standards in Two-dimensional Echocardiography. Circulation 1980;62:212-7
  7. Nicolson DG, Porto I, Westaby S, Boardman P, Banning AP. Spontaneous echocardiographic contrast in the ascending aorta mimicking the appearance of aortic dissection in a patient with a left ventricular assist device. Echocardiography 2004; 21:193-5
  8. Saito A, Shiono M, Orime Y, Yagi S, Nakata Ki, Eda K, et al. Effects of left ventricular assist device on cardiac function: experimental study of relationship between pump flow and left ventricular diastolic function. Artif Organs 2001;25:728-32
  9. Shiiya N, Zelinsky R, Deleuze PH, Loisance DY. Effects of Hemopump support on left ventricular unloading and coronary blood flow. ASAIO Trans 1991;37:M361-2
  10. Westaby S, Jin XY, Katsumata T, Taggart DP, Coats AJ, Frazier OH. Mechanical support in dilated cardiomyopathy: signs of early left ventricular recovery. Ann Thorac Surg 1997; 64:1303-8
  11. Holman WL, Bourge RC, Fan P, Kirklin JK, Pacifico AD, Nanda NC. Influence of left ventricular assist on valvular regurgitation. Circulation 1993;88(5 Pt 2):II309-18
  12. Moon MR, Castro LJ, DeAnda A, Tomizawa Y, Daughters GT 2nd, et al. Right ventricular dynamics during left ventricular assistance in closed-chest dogs. Ann Thorac Surg 1993;56:54-66; discussion 66-7
  13. Farrar DJ, Compton PG, Hershon JJ, Fonger JD, Hill JD. Right heart interaction with the mechanically assisted left heart. World J Surg