SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Türk Göğüs Kalp Damar Cerrahisi Dergisi / 2008 / Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 3

Which is the best evidence for a cardiac surgeon: Controlled randomized trial or database analysis?

Bir kalp cerrahı için en iyi bilimsel kanıt hangisidir: Kontrollü randomize çalışma mı, yoksa veritabanı analizi mi?

Hasan KARABULUT
Cem ALHAN
Fevzi TORAMAN
Şahin SENAY
Pages
205–205
Publication Date
2022-09-02
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
🔖

Cite This Article

KARABULUT, H., ALHAN, C., TORAMAN, F., SENAY, Ş. (2022). Which is the best evidence for a cardiac surgeon: Controlled randomized trial or database analysis?. Türk Göğüs Kalp Damar Cerrahisi Dergisi, Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 3, 205–205. https://ajindex.com/articles/425103

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (4)

  1. Sibbald B, Roland M. Understanding controlled trials. Why are randomised controlled trials important? BMJ 1998; 316:201
  2. Begg C, Cho M, Eastwood S, Horton R, Moher D, Olkin I, et al. Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement. JAMA 1996; 276:637-9
  3. Anyanwu AC, Treasure T. Surgical research revisited: clinical trials in the cardiothoracic surgical literature. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2004;25:299-303
  4. Anyanwu AC, Treasure T. Unrealistic expectations arising from mortality data reported in the cardiothoracic journals. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2002;123:16-20.