Treatment of aortic arch aneurysms: Open surgery or hybrid procedure?

However, there was no statistically significant difference in the survival rates, need for reoperation, and major adverse cardiovascular events between the groups.Conclusion: Our study results suggest that conventional open surgery and hybrid procedure are similar in terms of survival and short-to-mid-term results in patients undergoing total aortic arch replacement for aortic arch aneurysm.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯

Objective & Hypothesis:Background: This study aims to compare the results of hybrid procedure and open surgery for the treatment of aortic arch aneurysms.

📊

Key Findings & Data:Methods: Twenty-six patients (21 males, 5 females; mean age 56.6±12.4 years; range, 20 to 83 years) who underwent total aortic arch replacement for aortic arch aneurysm between January 2004 and January 2010 were retrospectively analyzed.

💡

Conclusion & Impact:However, there was no statistically significant difference in the survival rates, need for reoperation, and major adverse cardiovascular events between the groups.Conclusion: Our study results suggest that conventional open surgery and hybrid procedure are similar in terms of survival and short-to-mid-term results in patients undergoing total aortic arch replacement for aortic arch aneurysm.

🔬Design:Research Article

📍Scope:2004 Verileri

⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Background: This study aims to compare the results of hybrid procedure and open surgery for the treatment of aortic arch aneurysms. Methods: Twenty-six patients (21 males, 5 females; mean age 56.6±12.4 years; range, 20 to 83 years) who underwent total aortic arch replacement for aortic arch aneurysm between January 2004 and January 2010 were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were divided into two groups: open conventional surgery group (group 1, n=15) and hybrid procedure (total debranching of the aortic arch and simultaneous endovascular stent) group (group 2, n=11). Survival rates and need for reoperation were compared between the groups.Results: The hybrid procedure was found to be more favorable in terms of postoperative revision, extubation period, and drainage amounts. However, there was no statistically significant difference in the survival rates, need for reoperation, and major adverse cardiovascular events between the groups.Conclusion: Our study results suggest that conventional open surgery and hybrid procedure are similar in terms of survival and short-to-mid-term results in patients undergoing total aortic arch replacement for aortic arch aneurysm.

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışmada arkus aort anevrizmalarının tedavisinde hibrid işlem ve açık cerrahi sonuçları karşılaştırıldı. Çalışma planı: Ocak 2004 - Ocak 2010 tarihleri arasında arkus aort anevrizması nedeniyle total arkus aort replasmanı yapılan 26 hasta (21 erkek, 5 kadın; ort. yaş 56.6±12.4 yıl; dağılım, 20-83 yıl) retrospektif olarak değerlendirildi. Hastalar açık konvansiyonel cerrahi grubu (grup 1, n=15) ve hibrid işlem (aynı seansta total arkus aort debranching ve endovasküler stent implantasyonu) grubu (grup 2, n=11) olarak iki gruba ayrıldı. Sağkalım oranları ve tekrar ameliyat gereksinimi gruplar arasında karşılaştırıldı. Bulgular: Ameliyat sonrası revizyon, ekstübasyon süresi ve drenaj miktarları açısından hibrid işlem daha iyi bulundu. Ancak sağkalım oranları, tekrar ameliyat gereksinimi ve ciddi advers kardiyovasküler olaylar açısından gruplar arasında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir fark yoktu. Sonuç: Çalışma sonuçlarımız arkus aort anevrizması nedeniyle total arkus aort replasmanı yapılan hastalarda sağkalım ve kısa ila orta dönem sonuçlar açısından açık konvansiyonel cerrahi ve hibrid işlemin benzer olduğunu göstermektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

YILIK, L., GÜRBÜZ, A., GÖKALP, O., BEŞİR, Y., İNER, H., LAFCI, B., YEŞİLKAYA, N. K., ERGÜNEŞ, K. (2022). Treatment of aortic arch aneurysms: Open surgery or hybrid procedure?. Türk Göğüs Kalp Damar Cerrahisi Dergisi, Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 3, 351–358. https://ajindex.com/articles/423907

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

Open in New Tab ↗

↗New Tab

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

Tse LW, MacKenzie KS, Montreuil B, Obrand DI, Steinmetz OK. The proximal landing zone in endovascular repair of the thoracic aorta. Ann Vasc Surg 2004
Melissano G, Civilini E, Bertoglio L, Calliari F, Setacci F, Calori G, et al. Results of endografting of the aortic arch in different landing zones. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2007
Riesenman PJ, Tamaddon HS, Farber MA. Surgical bypass procedures to facilitate endovascular repair of aortic arch pathology. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino) 2008
Schumacher H, Von Tengg-Kobligk H, Ostovic M, Henninger V, Ockert S, Böckler D, et al. Hybrid aortic procedures for endoluminal arch replacement in thoracic aneurysms and type B dissections. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino) 2006
Chan YC, Cheng SW, Ting AC, Ho P. Supra-aortic hybrid endovascular procedures for complex thoracic aortic disease: single center early to midterm results. J Vasc Surg 2008
Benedetto U, Melina G, Angeloni E, Codispoti M, Sinatra R. Current results of open total arch replacement versus hybrid thoracic endovascular aortic repair for aortic arch aneurysm: a meta-analysis of comparative studies. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2013
Cazavet A, Alacoque X, Marcheix B, Chaufour X, Rousseau H, Glock Y, et al. Aortic arch aneurysm: short- and mid-term results comparing open arch surgery and the hybrid procedure. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2016
De Rango P, Ferrer C, Coscarella C, Musumeci F, Verzini F, Pogany G, et al. Contemporary comparison of aortic arch repair by endovascular and open surgical reconstructions. J Vasc Surg 2015
Iba Y, Minatoya K, Matsuda H, Sasaki H, Tanaka H, Oda T, et al. How should aortic arch aneurysms be treated in the endovascular aortic repair era? A risk-adjusted comparison between open and hybrid arch repair using propensity score-matching analysis. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2014
Tokuda Y, Oshima H, Narita Y, Abe T, Araki Y, Mutsuga M, et al. Hybrid versus open repair of aortic arch aneurysms: comparison of postoperative and mid-term outcomes with a propensity score-matching analysis. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2016
Kang WC, Ko YG, Shin EK, Park CH, Choi D, Youn YN, et al. Comparison of hybrid endovascular and open surgical repair for proximal aortic arch diseases. Int J Cardiol 2016
Preventza O, Garcia A, Cooley DA, Haywood-Watson RJ, Simpson K, Bakaeen FG, et al. Total aortic arch replacement: