Journals / Türk Göğüs Kalp Damar Cerrahisi Dergisi / 2018 / Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 1

Diagnosis and surgical treatment of aortopulmonary window: Our single-center experience

Aortopulmoner pencerenin tanı ve cerrahi tedavisi: Tek merkez deneyimimiz

Pages
30–37
Publication Date
2022-09-02
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It is, therefore, imperative to diagnose and treat this condition, before pulmonary vascular disease develops.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Background: In this study, we aimed to report our single-center experience in aortopulmonary window and review clinical signs, symptoms, surgical correction techniques, and long-term outcomes.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of a total of 30 patients who were followed with the diagnosis of aortopulmonary window in our hospital between May 1998 and June 2016.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It is, therefore, imperative to diagnose and treat this condition, before pulmonary vascular disease develops.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:2016 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Background: In this study, we aimed to report our single-center experience in aortopulmonary window and review clinical signs, symptoms, surgical correction techniques, and long-term outcomes. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of a total of 30 patients who were followed with the diagnosis of aortopulmonary window in our hospital between May 1998 and June 2016. The clinical characteristics of the patients, echocardiographic and angiographic findings, surgical treatment outcomes, and medical problems during follow-up were reviewed.Results: The most common signs and symptoms were murmur, dyspnea, tachypnea, growth retardation, and signs of congestive heart failure. The mean age at the time of surgery was 8.2±14.4 months (7 days to 60 months). Eighteen patients (60%) had additional congenital cardiac anomalies. Eleven patients had simple congenital heart diseases, and seven patients had complex congenital heart diseases. Four patients were unable to be operated due to Eisenmenger syndrome (n=3) and complex congenital heart disease (n=1). No early or late postoperative death was observed. The mean follow-up was 6.4±4.8 years (range, 5 months to 16 years). In addition to aortopulmonary window repair, an additional cardiac anomaly modifying surgical intervention was corrected in nine patients (34.6%). One patient was reoperated for residual aortopulmonary window and another patient for pulmonary stenosis (valvular, supravalvar) after three years. One of these patients underwent pulmonary balloon valvuloplasty after two years. The reoperation rate was 7.7% (n=2) during follow-up.Conclusion: Aortopulmonary window is a rare cardiac anomaly which may be overlooked by echocardiographic study, and which is amenable for repair with low-surgical risk. It is, therefore, imperative to diagnose and treat this condition, before pulmonary vascular disease develops.

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışmada aortopulmoner pencereye ilişkin tek merkezli deneyimimiz sunuldu ve klinik bulgular, belirtiler, cerrahi düzeltme teknikleri ve uzun dönem sonuçlar incelendi. Çalış­ma­ planı:­ Hastanemizde Mayıs 1998 - Haziran 2016 tarihleri arasında aortopulmoner pencere tanısı ile izlenen toplam 30 hastanın tıbbi kayıtları retrospektif olarak incelendi. Hastaların klinik özellikleri, ekokardiyografik ve anjiyografik bulguları, cerrahi girişim sonuçları ve takip sırasında tıbbi sorunlar değerlendirildi. Bulgu­lar:­ En sık görülen bulgu ve belirtiler üfürüm, dispne, taşipne, gelişim geriliği ve konjestif kalp yetmezliği bulguları idi. Cerrahi sırasındaki ortalama yaş 8.2±14.4 ay (dağılım 7 gün - 60 ay) idi. On sekiz (%60) hastaya ek kardiyak anomali eşlik etmekteydi. On bir hastada basit doğuştan kalp hastalığı, yedi hastada kompleks doğuştan kalp hastalığı vardı. Dört hasta Eisenmenger sendromu (n=3) ve kompleks doğumsal kalp hastalığı (n=1) nedeniyle ameliyat edilemedi. Cerrahi sonrası erken veya geç dönemde ölüm gözlenmedi. Ortalama takip süresi 6.4±4.8 yıl (dağılım 5 ay-16 yıl) idi. Aortopulmoner pencere onarımının yanı sıra, dokuz hastada (%34.6) cerrahi girişimi etkileyen ek kardiyak anomali düzeltildi. Üç yıl sonra bir hasta rezidüel aortopulmoner pencere ve bir diğer hasta pulmoner darlık (valvüler, supravalvüler) nedeniyle yeniden ameliyat edildi. Bu hastalardan birine iki yıl sonra pulmoner balon valvüloplasti uygulandı. Takip sırasında tekrar ameliyat oranı %7.7 (n=2) idi. Sonuç:­ Aortopulmoner pencere ekokardiyografik çalışma sırasında atlanabilen ve düşük cerrahi risk ile onarımı olanaklı olan nadir bir kardiyak anomalidir. Bu nedenle, pulmoner vasküler hastalık gelişmeden önce tanı konması ve tedavi edilmesi önemlidir.

🔖

Cite This Article

AŞLAMACI, S., ERDOĞAN, İ., ÖZKAN, M., YAKUT, K., TOKEL, N. K., VARAN, B. (2022). Diagnosis and surgical treatment of aortopulmonary window: Our single-center experience. Türk Göğüs Kalp Damar Cerrahisi Dergisi, Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 1, 30–37. https://ajindex.com/articles/423888

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (1)

  1. Bagtharia R, Trivedi KR, Burkhart HM, Williams WG, Freedom RM, Van Arsdell GS, et al. Outcomes for patients with an aortopulmonary window, and the impact of associated cardiovascular lesions. Cardiol Young 2004;14:473-80. 26. Tkebuchava T, von Segesser LK, Vogt PR, Bauersfeld U, Jenni R, Künzli A, et al. Congenital aortopulumonary window: diagnosis, surgical technique and long-term results. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 1997;11:293-7. 25. Hew CC, Bacha EA, Zurakowski D, del Nido PJ Jr, Jonas RA. Optimal surgical approach for repair of aortopulmonary window. Cardiol Young 2001;11:385-90. 24. Marini D, Calcagni G, Ou P, Bonnet D, Agnoletti G. Percutaneous treatment of aorto-pulmonary window in a one year old child. Int J Cardiol 2008;129:e91-3. 23. Marini D, Ferraro G, Agnoletti G. Iatrogenic “aortopulmonary window”: percutaneous rescue closure as a bridge to surgical repair. Cardiol Young 2016;26:609-11. 22. Stamato T, Benson LN, Smallhorn JF, Freedom RM. Transcatheter closure of an aortopulmonary window with a modified double umbrella occluder system. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 1995;35:165-7. 21. Trehan V, Nigam A, Tyagi S. Percutaneous closure of nonrestrictive aortopulmonary window in three infants. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2008;71:405-11. 20. Naik GD, Chandra VS, Shenoy A, Isaac BC, Shetty GG, Padmakumar P, et al. Transcatheter closure of aortopulmonary window using Amplatzer device. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2003;59:402-5. 19. Atiq M, Rashid N, Kazmi KA, Qureshi SA. Closure of aortopulmonary window with amplatzer duct occluder device. Pediatr Cardiol 2003;24:298-9. 18. Odemiş E, Güzeltaş A, Bilici M, Oztürk E. Closure of nonrestrictive aortopulmonary window in an infant by the transcatheter approach. Anadolu Kardiyol Derg 2012;12:364. 17. Yüksel İÖ, Köklü E, Arslan Ş, Üreyen ÇM, Küçükseymen S. Aortopulmonary window in adulthood: Surviving at 22 years without intervention or pulmonary vascular disease. Turk Kardiyol Dern Ars 2016;44:332-4. 16. Bobos D, Kanakis MA, Koulouri S, Giannopoulos NM. One-Stage Repair of an Interrupted Aortic Arch with an Aortopulmonary Window in a Premature Neonate. Korean J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2015;48:411-4. 15. Singh J, Loona M, Suryavanshi A, Sahoo M, Mahant TS. Aortopulmonary Window With Anomalous Coronary Arteries. J Card Surg 2015;30:846-8. 14. Naimo PS, Yong MS, d'Udekem Y, Brizard CP, Kelly A, Weintraub R, et al. Outcomes of aortopulmonary window repair in children: 33 years of experience. Ann Thorac Surg 2014;98:1674-