SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Türk Göğüs Kalp Damar Cerrahisi Dergisi / 2019 / Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 1

Comparison of the one-year patency rates of radiocephalic arteriovenous fistulas created using no-touch versus conventional technique

No-touch’a karşı konvansiyonel teknik kullanılarak oluşturulan radiosefalik arteriyovenöz fistüllerin bir yıldaki açıklık oranlarının karşılaştırılması

Hamdi TOKÖZ
Fuat BİLGEN
Ayça ÖZGEN
İsmail ORAL HASTAOĞLU
Pages
43–48
Publication Date
2022-09-02
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The two groups did not differ with regards to primaryor secondary patency rates.Conclusion: Findings of this study were not in favor of theno-touch technique compared to the conventional methods interms of arteriovenous fistula patency at one year.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Background: This study aims to compare the patency rates ofradiocephalic arteriovenous fistulas prepared preserving theperivenous vascular tissues versus those prepared using theconventional technique.Methods: A total of 169 patients (107 males, 62 females;mean age 59.5 years; range, 39 to 87 years) who underwent aradiocephalic arteriovenous fistula construction were includedin this study.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In 95 patients, the tissues surrounding the cephalicvein were stripped off as per the conventional method, while theno-touch technique preserving the perivenous vascular tissueswas utilized for vein harvesting in 74 patients.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The two groups did not differ with regards to primaryor secondary patency rates.Conclusion: Findings of this study were not in favor of theno-touch technique compared to the conventional methods interms of arteriovenous fistula patency at one year.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Background: This study aims to compare the patency rates ofradiocephalic arteriovenous fistulas prepared preserving theperivenous vascular tissues versus those prepared using theconventional technique.Methods: A total of 169 patients (107 males, 62 females;mean age 59.5 years; range, 39 to 87 years) who underwent aradiocephalic arteriovenous fistula construction were includedin this study. In 95 patients, the tissues surrounding the cephalicvein were stripped off as per the conventional method, while theno-touch technique preserving the perivenous vascular tissueswas utilized for vein harvesting in 74 patients. Patients werefollowed-up to compare primary and secondary patency rates ofthe arteriovenous fistulas at one year.Results: Fistula failure developed in 22 patients within the firstyear resulting in primary patency rates of 90.5% versus 84.2%for the no-touch and the conventional groups, respectively(p=0.225). Likewise, secondary patency rates were 94.6% versus93.7% for the no-touch and the conventional groups, respectively(p=0.803). The two groups did not differ with regards to primaryor secondary patency rates.Conclusion: Findings of this study were not in favor of theno-touch technique compared to the conventional methods interms of arteriovenous fistula patency at one year.

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışmada perivenöz vasküler dokuların korunması yoluna karşı konvansiyonel teknik kullanılarak hazırlanan radiosefalik arteriyovenöz fistüllerin açıklık oranları karşılaştırıldı. Çalışma planı: Çalışmaya radiosefalik arteriyovenöz fistül yapımı uygulanan toplam 169 hasta (107 erkek, 62 kadın; ort. yaş 59.5 yıl; dağılım, 39-87 yıl) dahil edildi. Doksan beş hastada konvansiyonel yöntem uyarınca sefalik damarı çevreleyen dokular çıkarılırken 74 hastada damar hazırlanması için perivenöz vasküler dokuları koruyan no-touch tekniğinden yararlanıldı. Hastalar arteriyovenöz fistüllerin bir yıldaki primer ve sekonder açıklık oranlarının karşılaştırılması için takip edildi. Bulgular: Yirmi iki hastada birinci yıl içinde fistül hatası gelişerek no-touch ve konvansiyonel gruplar için sırasıyla %90.5’e karşı %84.2 primer açıklık oranına neden oldu (p=0.225). Benzer şekilde, sekonder açıklık oranları no-touch ve konvansiyonel gruplar için sırasıyla %94.6’ya karşı %93.7 idi (p=0.803). İki grup primer ve sekonder açıklık oranları bakımından farklı değildi. Sonuç: Bu çalışmanın bulguları bir yıldaki arteriyovenöz fistül açıklığı açısından konvansiyonel yöntemlerle karşılaştırıldığında no-touch tekniği lehine değildi.

🔖

Cite This Article

TOKÖZ, H., BİLGEN, F., ÖZGEN, A., HASTAOĞLU, İ. O. (2022). Comparison of the one-year patency rates of radiocephalic arteriovenous fistulas created using no-touch versus conventional technique. Türk Göğüs Kalp Damar Cerrahisi Dergisi, Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 1, 43–48. https://ajindex.com/articles/423745

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Brescia MJ, Cimino JE, Appel K, Hurwich BJ. Chronic hemodialysis using venipuncture and a surgically created arteriovenous fistula. N Engl J Med 1966;275:1089-92
  2. Miller A, Hölzenbein TJ, Gottlieb MN, Sacks BA, Lavin PT, Goodman WS, et al. Strategies to increase the use of autogenous arteriovenous fistula in end-stage renal disease. Ann Vasc Surg 1997;11:397-405
  3. Vascular Access Work Group. Clinical practice guidelines for vascular access. Am J Kidney Dis 2006;48 Suppl 1:S248-73
  4. Akbas H, Kanko M, Tekinalp H, Bülbül S, Alp M. Retrospective evaluation of A-V fistulas for hemodialysis. Turk Gogus Kalp Dama 2000;8:638-40
  5. Schanzer H, Schanzer A. Vascular access for dialysis. In: Haimovici H, Ascher E, Hollier LH, Strandness DE, Towne JB, Calligaro K, et al. editor. Haimovici’s Vascular Surgery. New Jersey: Blackwell; 2004
  6. Reinhold C, Haage P, Hollenbeck M, Mickley V, Ranft J. Multidisciplinary management of vascular access for haemodialysis: from the preparation of the initial access to the treatment of stenosis and thrombosis. Vasa 2011;40:188-98
  7. Rooijens PP, Tordoir JH, Stijnen T, Burgmans JP, Smet de AA, Yo TI. Radiocephalic wrist arteriovenous fistula for hemodialysis: meta-analysis indicates a high primary failure rate. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2004;28:583-9
  8. Jennings WC, Kindred MG, Broughan TA. Creating radiocephalic arteriovenous fistulas: technical and functional success. J Am Coll Surg 2009;208:419-25
  9. Al-Jaishi AA, Oliver MJ, Thomas SM, Lok CE, Zhang JC, Garg AX, et al. Patency rates of the arteriovenous fistula for hemodialysis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Kidney Dis 2014;63:464-78
  10. Nakata J, Io H, Watanabe T, Sasaki Y, Makita Y, Aoki T, et al. Impact of preoperative ultrasonography findings on the patency rate of vascular access in Japanese hemodialysis patients. Springerplus 2016;5:462
  11. Turmel-Rodrigues L, Pengloan J, Blanchier D, Abaza M, Birmelé B, Haillot O, et al. Insufficient dialysis shunts: improved long-term patency rates with close hemodynamic monitoring, repeated percutaneous balloon angioplasty, and stent placement. Radiology 1993;187:273-8
  12. Turmel-Rodrigues L, Pengloan J, Baudin S, Testou D, Abaza M, Dahdah G, et al. Treatment of stenosis and thrombosis in haemodialysis fistulas and grafts by interventional radiology. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2000;15:2029-36
  13. Souza DS, Dashwood MR, Tsui JC, Filbey D, Bodin L, Johansson B, et al. Improved patency in vein grafts harvested with