Journals / Türk Göğüs Kalp Damar Cerrahisi Dergisi / 2013 / Cilt: 21 - Sayı: 4

Ischemic syndrome due to distal hypoperfusion in hemodialysis arteriovenous fistulas

Hemodiyaliz amaçlı arteriyovenöz fistüllerde distal hipoperfüzyona bağlı iskemik sendrom

Pages
936–943
Publication Date
2022-09-02
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: We conclude that the continuity of dialysis can be highly sustained in patients with steal syndrome due to dialysis, maintaining the current arteriovenous fistulas through appropriate revision techniques.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Background: This study aims to evaluate the reasons for steal syndrome and preventive and therapeutic modalities.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: Thirty-six patients (23 males, 13 females; mean age 58.3 years; 43 to 77 years) who were treated in our cardiovascular outpatient clinic between January 2012 and September 2012 were retrospectively analyzed.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: We conclude that the continuity of dialysis can be highly sustained in patients with steal syndrome due to dialysis, maintaining the current arteriovenous fistulas through appropriate revision techniques.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2012 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Background: This study aims to evaluate the reasons for steal syndrome and preventive and therapeutic modalities. Methods: Thirty-six patients (23 males, 13 females; mean age 58.3 years; 43 to 77 years) who were treated in our cardiovascular outpatient clinic between January 2012 and September 2012 were retrospectively analyzed. Results: Nineteen of the patients were diabetic (52.7%). Fistulas were located in the antecubital region in 21 patients (58.3%), while others were located in the distal forearm. We performed distal revascularization interval ligation in four patients (11.1%), banding in eight patients (22.2%), plication of anastomosis and dilated venous segment in four patients (11.1%), interposition of 6 mm PTFE graft in five patients (13.8%) and ligation of distal radial artery in eight patients (22.2%). Ligation of radial artery and lateral branches with banding was administered in four patients (11.1%). Three patients (8.3%) underwent revision surgery by using distal inflow. None of the patients had loss of thrill following the procedure. No catheter was required except for one patient. The mean follow-up was 10.9 months (range 1-28 months). The procedure failed in five patients (13.8%). The complaints were completely recovered in 31 patients. Conclusion: We conclude that the continuity of dialysis can be highly sustained in patients with steal syndrome due to dialysis, maintaining the current arteriovenous fistulas through appropriate revision techniques.

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışmada çalma sendromunun nedenleri,önlenmesi ve tedavi yöntemleri değerlendirildi.Ça­lış­ma pla­nı: Hastanemiz kalp ve damar cerrahisi bölümünde 2008 Ocak - Eylül 2012 tarihleri arasında tedaviedilen 36 hasta (23 erkek, 13 kadın; ort. yaş 58.3 yıl; dağılım 43-77 yıl) retrospektif olarak incelendi. Bul­g u­l ar: Hastaların 19’u (%52.7) diyabetik idi.Fistüller 21 hastada (%58.3) antekübital bölgede yerleşimli iken, diğer fistüller ön kolda distal yerleşimli idi.Dört hastada (%11.1) distal revaskülarizasyon interval ligasyon, sekiz hastada (%22.2) banding, dört hastada (%11.1) anastomoz ve dilate ven segmenti plikasyonu, beş hastada (%13.8) 6 mm PTFE greft (4-6 cm boyunda)interpozisyonu ve sekiz hastada (%22.2) distal radialarter ligasyonu uygulandı. Dört hastada (%11.1) banding işlemi radial arter ve yan dal ligasyonları ile birlikteuygulandı. Üç hastada (%8.3) ise, distal giriş kullanılarak revizyon cerrahisi uygulandı. Hiçbir hastada işlemsonrası tril kaybı görülmedi. Bir hasta dışında kateter gereksinimi olmadı. Ortalama takip süresi 10.9 ay(dağılım 1-28 ay) olarak bulundu. Beş hastada (%13.8)işlem başarısız oldu. Otuz bir hastanın (%86.1) yakınmaları ise tam olarak düzeldi.So­nuç: Diyalize bağlı çalma sendromlarında uygun revizyon teknikleri ile hastaların mevcut arteriyovenöz fistülleri korunarak, yüksek oranda diyaliz devamlılığının sürdürülebileceğini düşünüyoruz.

🔖

Cite This Article

HASTAOĞLU, İ. O., PARLAR, H., TOKÖZ, H., BİLGEN, F. (2022). Ischemic syndrome due to distal hypoperfusion in hemodialysis arteriovenous fistulas. Türk Göğüs Kalp Damar Cerrahisi Dergisi, Cilt: 21 - Sayı: 4, 936–943. https://ajindex.com/articles/424501

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Malik J, Tuka V, Kasalova Z, Chytilova E, Slavikova M, Clagett P, et al. Understanding the dialysis access steal syndrome. A review of the etiologies, diagnosis, prevention and treatment strategies. J Vasc Access 2008;9:155-66
  2. Minion DJ, Moore E, Endean E. Revision using distal inflow: a novel approach to dialysis-associated steal syndrome. Ann Vasc Surg 2005;19:625-8
  3. Tordoir JH, Dammers R, van der Sande FM. Upper extremity ischemia and hemodialysis vascular access. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2004;27:1-5
  4. Özbek İC, Kocailik A, Sever K, Mansuroğlu D. Hemodiyaliz amaçlı arteriyovenöz fistüllerde gelişen çalma sendromunun basınç kontrollü PTFE banding yöntemiyle tedavisi. Turk Gogus Kalp Dama 2011;19:182-5
  5. Thermann F, Kornhuber M. Ischemic monomelic neuropathy: a rare but important complication after hemodialysis access placement--a review. Vasc Access 2011;12:113-9
  6. Callaghan CJ, Mallik M, Sivaprakasam R, Iype S, Pettigrew GJ. Treatment of dialysis access-associated steal syndrome with the “revision using distal inflow” technique. J Vasc Access 2011;12:52-6
  7. Schanzer H, Schwartz M, Harrington E, Haimov M. Treatment of ischemia due to “steal” by arteriovenous fistula with distal artery ligation and revascularization. J Vasc Surg 1988;7:770-3
  8. Morsy AH, Kulbaski M, Chen C, Isiklar H, Lumsden AB. Incidence and characteristics of patients with hand ischemia after a hemodialysis access procedure. J Surg Res 1998;74:8-10
  9. Goff CD, Sato DT, Bloch PH, DeMasi RJ, Gregory RT, Gayle RG, et al. Steal syndrome complicating hemodialysis access procedures: can it be predicted? Ann Vasc Surg 2000;14:138-44
  10. Hugh A, Gelabert, Freischlog JA. Hemodialysis access. In: Robert B, editor. Vascular surgery. Rutherford: W.B. Saunders Company; 2000. p. 1474-75
  11. NKF-DOQI clinical practice guidelines for vascular access. National Kidney Foundation-Dialysis Outcomes Quality Initiative. Am J Kidney Dis 1997;30:S150-91
  12. Thermann F, Wollert U, Dralle H, Brauckhoff M. Dialysis shunt-associated steal syndrome with autogenous hemodialysis accesses: proposal for a new classification based on clinical results. World J Surg 2008;32:2309-15
  13. Zangan SM, Van Ha TG. Percutaneous placement of a constrained stent for the treatment of dialysis associated arteriovenous graft steal syndrome. J Vasc Access 2007;8:228-30
  14. Lazarides MK, Staramos DN, Panagopoulos GN, Tzilalis VD, Eleftheriou GJ, Dayantas JN. Indications for surgical treatment of angioaccess-ind