Journals / Laparoscopic Endoscopic Surgical Science / 2021 / Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 3

Baseline laboratory parameters as predictors ofadmission to intensive care unit after laparoscopiccholecystectomy

Pages
136–140
Publication Date
2022-09-04
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

If validated, this simple approach can contribute to thedevelopment of new personalized treatment strategies.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Introduction: The role of laboratory biomarkers for predicting adverse clinical outcomes after laparoscopiccholecystectomy is unclear.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and Methods: All patients over 18 years old that underwent successful laparoscopic cholecys tectomy between February 20, 2019, and June 15, 2021, at Ankara City Hospital Department of GeneralSurgery were included in the study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:If validated, this simple approach can contribute to thedevelopment of new personalized treatment strategies.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2019 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Introduction: The role of laboratory biomarkers for predicting adverse clinical outcomes after laparoscopiccholecystectomy is unclear. This study aimed to investigate the potential biomarkers for predicting admis sion to intensive care unit (ICU) in patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Materials and Methods: All patients over 18 years old that underwent successful laparoscopic cholecys tectomy between February 20, 2019, and June 15, 2021, at Ankara City Hospital Department of GeneralSurgery were included in the study. The main outcome of the study was unplanned admission to ICU afterlaparoscopic cholecystectomy. Stata statistical package program (version 15.1/IC; StataCorp) was used toperform all data analyses. Results: Of 877 patients that were included in the current study, 76 (8.6%) were admitted to ICU. Multivari able logistic regression analysis revealed that lower levels of potassium (odds ratio [OR]: 0.206; 95% confi dence interval [CI]: 0.109–0.388; p<0.001) and higher levels of monocyte (OR: 3.145; 95% CI: 1.472–6.715;p=0.003), total bilirubin (OR: 1.002; 95% CI: 1.001–1.003; p<0.001) and neutrophil (OR: 1.171; 95% CI: 1.102– 1.244; p<0.001) were independently associated with an increased risk of admission to ICU. The accuracy ofpredicting ICU admission was assessed by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve whichwas = 0.83. A nomogram was developed with significant predictors (neutrophil, total bilirubin, monocyte,and potassium) for the admission ICU. Conclusion: This is the first study investigating the role of laboratory parameters for predicting the need forICU admission after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. If validated, this simple approach can contribute to thedevelopment of new personalized treatment strategies.

🔖

Cite This Article

SÜREL, A. A. (2022). Baseline laboratory parameters as predictors ofadmission to intensive care unit after laparoscopiccholecystectomy. Laparoscopic Endoscopic Surgical Science, Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 3, 136–140. https://ajindex.com/articles/423558

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Soper NJ, Stockmann PT, Dunnegan DL, Ashley SW. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy the new’gold standard’? Arch Surg 1992;127:917–23
  2. Marinis A, Stamatakis E, Tsaroucha A, Dafnios N, Anastasopoulos G, Polymeneas G, et al. Safety and effectiveness of outpatient laparoscopic cholecystectomy in a teaching hospital: a prospective study of 110 consecutive patients. BMC Res Notes 2010;3:207
  3. Calland JF, Tanaka K, Foley E, Bovbjerg VE, Markey DW, Blome S, et al. Outpatient laparoscopic cholecystectomy: patient outcomes after implementation of a clinical pathway. Ann Surg 2001;233:704–15
  4. Shea JA, Berlin JA, Bachwich DR, Staroscik RN, Malet PF, McGuckin M, et al. Indications for and outcomes of cholecystectomy: a comparison of the pre and postlaparoscopic eras. Ann Surg 1998;227:343–50
  5. Nealon WH, Bawduniak J, Walser EM. Appropriate timing of cholecystectomy in patients who present with moderate to severe gallstone-associated acute pancreatitis with peripancreatic fluid collections. Ann Surg 2004;239:741–9; discussion 749–51
  6. Aubin JM, Bressan AK, Edwards JP, Grondin SC, Dixon E, Min ter RM, et al. The adequacy of hepatopancreatobiliary training: How does operative exposure and perceived readiness in fellowship translate into subsequent practice? Can J Surg 2017;60:140–3
  7. Fowler DL, Hogle NJ. The Fellowship Council: a decade of impact on surgical training. Surg Endosc 2013;27:3548–54
  8. Lam CM, Yuen AW, Chik B, Wai AC, Fan ST. Variation in the use of laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis: a population-based study. Arch Surg 2005;140:1084–8
  9. Withers AS, Grieve A, Loveland JA. Correlation of white cell count and CRP in acute appendicitis in paediatric patients. S Afr J Surg 2019;57:40
  10. Shindoh J, Niwa H, Kawai K, Ohata K, Ishihara Y, Takabayashi N, et al. Predictive factors for negative outcomes in initial non-operative management of suspected appendicitis. J Gastrointest Surg 2010;14:309–14
  11. Hajibandeh S, Hajibandeh S, Hobbs N, Mansour M. Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio predicts acute appendicitis and distinguishes between complicated and uncomplicated appendicitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Surg 2020;219:154–63
  12. Cigsar G, Yildirim AC, Anuk T, Guzel H, Gunal E, Gulkan S, et al. Neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio on appendectomy of geriatric and nongeriatric patients. J Invest Surg 2017;30:285–90
  13. Yazar FM, Urfalioglu A, Bakacak M, Boran OF, Bulbuloglu E. Efficacy of the evaluation of ınflamma