Journals / Laparoscopic Endoscopic Surgical Science / 2021 / Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 1

Steps to be considered in the unsuccessful endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pre-criteria: Early pre-cut intervention. A retrospective cohort study

Pages
55–62
Publication Date
2022-09-04
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In unsuccessful cannulation, a 3-day waiting period reduces complications.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Introduction: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is a widely used procedure for the treatment of several hepatobiliary and pancreatic diseases and also for diagnostic purposes of rare conditions.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Despite advances in endoscopic accessories, selective biliary cannulation fails in 5–15% of cases, even in expert high-volume centers.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In unsuccessful cannulation, a 3-day waiting period reduces complications.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Introduction: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is a widely used procedure for the treatment of several hepatobiliary and pancreatic diseases and also for diagnostic purposes of rare conditions. Despite advances in endoscopic accessories, selective biliary cannulation fails in 5–15% of cases, even in expert high-volume centers. However, there is still no consensus regarding the clinical outcomes of failed ERCP patients who underwent precut sphincterotomy. In the current work, we present the therapeutic approach and the outcomes of our patients with failed ERCP due to several reasons. Materials and Methods: There were 1986 patients who were referred from another center due to primary ERCP requirement (n=1862) or unsuccessful attempts to study at the primary center (n=124). If the papilla has prerequisite criteria for failed ERCP, then the procedure was begun directly with precut incision. Results: The ERCP procedure was successfully performed in all 1794 patients using a classic cannulation procedure. Pre-cut sphincterotomy method was successfully performed in 160 patients. There were 123 patients diagnosed by ERCP in our center and 103 of them were cannulated successfully with pre-cut sphincterotomy method. Pancreatitis developed in 12 of the 1794 patients (0.66%) whose primary cannulation was successful. However, only two of the 160 patients (1.25%) who underwent precut sphincterotomy developed pancreatitis postoperatively. One of these two patients had undergone unsuccessful precut trials. Conclusion: The cannulation rate depends on the experience, the referral center where the procedure is carried out, the anatomical structure of the papilla, the indication necessitating the ERCP, and also the use of precut incision. In cannulation failure, patients should be directed to experienced, high-volume, and tertiary centers. In patients with failed ERCP pre-criteria, intervention should be initiated with the liberal use of the precut method. In unsuccessful cannulation, a 3-day waiting period reduces complications.

🔖

Cite This Article

Akay, T., Kırmacı, M. B., Yılmaz, S. (2022). Steps to be considered in the unsuccessful endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pre-criteria: Early pre-cut intervention. A retrospective cohort study. Laparoscopic Endoscopic Surgical Science, Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 1, 55–62. https://ajindex.com/articles/423539

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (2)

  1. Spicak J, Hucl T. Perfect of failed ERCP: What makes the difference. Gastroenterology 2015;4:108–13
  2. Johnson KD, Perisetti A, Tharian B, Thandassery R, Jamidar P, Goyal H, et al. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography-related complications and their management strategies: A “scoping”literature review. Dig Dis Sci 2020;65:361– 75. [CrossRef] 3. Chen Q, Jin P, Ji X, Du H, Lu J. Management of difficult or failed biliary access in initial ERCP: A review of current literature. Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol 2019;43:365–72. [CrossRef] 4. Manes G, Paspatis G, Aabakken L, Anderloni A, Arvanitakis M, Ah-Soune P, et al. Endoscopic management of common bile duct stones: European society of gastrointestinal endoscopy (ESGE) guideline. Endoscopy 2019;51:472–91. [CrossRef] 5. Lee TH, Hwang SO, Choi HJ, Jung Y, Cha SW, Chung IK, et al. Sequential algorithm analysis to facilitate selective biliary access for difficult biliary cannulation in ERCP: A prospective clinical study. BMC Gastroenterol 2014;14:30. [CrossRef] 6. Colan-Hernandez J, Aldana A, Concepción M, Chavez K, Gómez C, Mendez-Bocanegra A, et al. Optimal timing for a second ERCP after failure of initial biliary cannulation following precut sphincterotomy: An analysis of experience at two tertiary centers. Surg Endosc 2017;31:3711–7. [CrossRef] 7. Pavlides M, Barnabas A, Fernandopulle N, Bailey AA, Collier J, Phillips-Hughes J, et al. Repeat endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreaticography after failed initial precut sphincterotomy for biliary cannulation. World J Gastroenterol 2014;20:13153–8. [CrossRef] 8. Tanisaka Y, Ryozawa S, Mizuide M, Harada M, Fujita A, Ogawa T, et al. Analysis of the factors involved in procedural failure: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography using a short-type single-balloon enteroscope for patients with surgically altered gastrointestinal anatomy. Dig Endosc 2019;31:682–9. [CrossRef] 9. Chen YI, Callichurn K, Chatterjee A, Desilets E, Fergal D, Forbes N, et al. ELEMENT TRIAL: Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial on endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage of first intent with a lumen-apposing metal stent vs. endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatography in the management of malignant distal biliary obstruction. Trials 2019;20:696. [CrossRef] 10. Yang MJ, Kim JH, Hwang JC, Yoo BM, Kim SS, Lim SG, et al. Usefulness of combined percutaneous-endoscopic rendezvous techniques after failed therapeutic endoscopic retrograde cholangiography in the era