Journals / Laparoscopic Endoscopic Surgical Science / 2022 / Cilt: 29 - Sayı: 2

Elective laparoscopic splenectomy: A single-center experience and results

Pages
57–60
Publication Date
2022-09-04
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Laparoscopy should be the first choice if possible in elective benign conditions of the spleen, especially if the spleen size is not too large.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Introduction: Studies have shown that laparoscopic splenectomy (LS) is effective, safe, and also more advantages to open surgery with relatively fewer complications and improved patient outcomes.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and Methods: Between January 2017 and December 2020, 106 patients underwent total or partial splenectomy for traumatic or non-traumatic reasons.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Laparoscopy should be the first choice if possible in elective benign conditions of the spleen, especially if the spleen size is not too large.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2017 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Introduction: Studies have shown that laparoscopic splenectomy (LS) is effective, safe, and also more advantages to open surgery with relatively fewer complications and improved patient outcomes. In this retrospective study, we evaluated the pre-operative, peroperative, and post-operative patient data, pre-operative diagnoses, and patient demographics of our center experience. Materials and Methods: Between January 2017 and December 2020, 106 patients underwent total or partial splenectomy for traumatic or non-traumatic reasons. Elective LS was performed on 25 patients in our clinic between these dates. Twenty-three of these patients finished with laparoscopically were evaluated in this study. Results: Of the 23 patients who underwent LS, 7 (30.4%) were male, 16 (69.6%) were female, and the mean age was 33.7±12.24. Splenectomy indications are shown in Table 1. The most common indication for surgery in our series was idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura and the second most was hereditary spherocytosis. The mean operative time was 145±40 min. An abdominal drain was placed in all patients. The drains were removed in an average of 1.4 (1–2) days postoperatively. The blood loss during the operation was 60±15 ml. The mean post-operative hospital stay was 3.17±0.71 days. Post-operative wound infection was observed in the incision in which the piece was removed in four patients. All wound infections resolved with drainage, wound dressing, and antibiotics. Conclusion: LS is a method that can be safely performed by experienced surgeons. Laparoscopy should be the first choice if possible in elective benign conditions of the spleen, especially if the spleen size is not too large.

🔖

Cite This Article

YALÇIN, M., ÖTER, S. (2022). Elective laparoscopic splenectomy: A single-center experience and results. Laparoscopic Endoscopic Surgical Science, Cilt: 29 - Sayı: 2, 57–60. https://ajindex.com/articles/423521

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Moris D, Dimitriou N, Griniatsos J. Laparoscopic splenectomy for benign hematological disorders in adults: a systematic review. In Vivo 2017;31:291–302
  2. Bai YN, Jiang H, Prasoon P. A meta-analysis of perioperative outcomes of laparoscopic splenectomy for hematological disorders. World J Surg 2012;36:2349–58
  3. Orcalli F, Elio A, Veronese E, Frigo F, Salvato S, Residori C. Conservative laparoscopy in the treatment of posttraumatic splenic laceration using microfiber hemostatic collagen: three case histories. Surg Laparosc Endosc 1998;8:445–8
  4. Ermolov AS, Tlibekova MA, Yartsev PA, Guliaev AA, Rogal MM, Samsonov VT, et al. Laparoscopic splenectomy in patients with spleen ınjuries. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2015;25:483–6
  5. Rodríguez-Luna MR, Balagué C, Fernández-Ananín S, Vilallonga R, Targarona Soler EM. Outcomes of laparoscopic splenectomy for treatment of splenomegaly: a systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Surg 2021;45:465–79
  6. Vianelli N, Palandri F, Polverelli N, Stasi R, Joelsson J, Johansson E, et al. Splenectomy as a curative treatment for immune thrombocytopenia: a retrospective analysis of 233 patients with a minimum follow up of 10 years. Haematologica 2013;98:875–80
  7. Liu EH, Dilip CK, Yeh TS, Wu JH, Jan YY, Chen MF. Long-term relapse-free rurvival rate and predictive factors of idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura in adults undergoing splenectomy. Biomed J 2013;36:23–7
  8. Rehmani B, Kumar N, Pathak P. Changing trends in elective splenectomy at a tertiary hospital in North India-a 10year study. Int Surg J 2017;4:2589–93
  9. Patel AG, Parker JE, Wallwork B, Kau KB, Donaldson N, Rhodes MR, et al. Massive splenomegaly is associated with significant morbidity after laparoscopic splenectomy. Ann Surg 2003;238:235
  10. Wang Y, Zhan X, Zhu Y, Xie Z, Zhu J, Ye Z. Laparoscopic splenectomy in portal hypertension: a single-surgeon 13- year experience. Surg Endosc 2010;24:1164–9
  11. Casaccia M, Torelli P, Pasa A, Sormani MP, Rossi E. Putative predictive parameters for the outcome of laparoscopic splenectomy: a multicenter analysis performed on the Italian Registry of Laparoscopic Surgery of the Spleen. Ann Surg 2010;251:287–91
  12. Chen X, Peng B, Cai Y, Zhou J, Wang Y, Wu Z, et al. Laparoscopic splenectomy for patients with immune thrombocytopenia and very low platelet count: Is platelet transfusion necessary? J Surg Res 2011;170:e225–32
  13. Wu Z, Zhou J, Li J, Zhu Y, Peng B. The feasibility of laparoscopic splenectomy for