SavedAdd your journal

Journals / SOSYAL BİLİMLER METİNLERİ / 2019 / Cilt: 2019 - Sayı: 2

THE IMPACT OF ECONOMIC FREEDOM ON THE SHADOW ECONOMY: PANEL ANALYSIS

EKONOMİK ÖZGÜRLÜĞÜN YERALTI EKONOMİSİ ÜZERİNDEKİ ETKİSİ: PANEL ANALİZ

Jülide YALÇINKAYA KOYUNCU
Hüseyin Safa ÜNAL
Pages
35–46
Publication Date
2019-12-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The most effective freedom indicators on the shadow economy are overall economic freedom and business freedom, but the least effective is investment freedom.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study aims to find the relationship between economic freedom and the size of the shadow economy in 153 countries for the period between 1999 and 2013.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Panel fixed effects (FEM) and panel random effects models (REM) are utilized based on the Hausman test results.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The most effective freedom indicators on the shadow economy are overall economic freedom and business freedom, but the least effective is investment freedom.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:2013 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Yeraltı Ekonomisi · Ekonomik Özgürlük · Rassal Etkiler Modeli

Abstract

This study aims to find the relationship between economic freedom and the size of the shadow economy in 153 countries for the period between 1999 and 2013. Panel fixed effects (FEM) and panel random effects models (REM) are utilized based on the Hausman test results. Employment and economic freedom indicators are found to be in negative association with the size of the shadow economy. On the other hand, tax burden and employment positively affect the size of the shadow economy. The most effective freedom indicators on the shadow economy are overall economic freedom and business freedom, but the least effective is investment freedom.

Özet

Bu çalışma, ekonomik özgürlük ve yeraltı ekonomisinin büyüklüğü arasındaki ilişkiyi 153 ülke verisini 1999 ve 2013 yılları arasındaki periyodu göz önünde bulundurarak incelemeyi amaçlamaktadır. Bu sebeple, Hausman test sonuçlarına dayanarak sabit etkiler (FEM) ve rassal etkiler modellerinden (REM) faydalanılmıştır. İstihdam ve ekonomik özgürlük göstergeleri yeraltı ekonomisinin büyüklüğü ile negatif ilişki içerisindedir. Diğer yandan, vergi yükü ve istihdam, yeraltı ekonomisinin boyutu üzerinde pozitif etkiye sahiptir. Genel ekonomik özgürlük ve iş yapma özgürlüğü, yeraltı ekonomisi üzerindeki en etkili özgürlük göstergeleridir. Ancak en az etkili olanı yatırım yapma özgürlüğü olarak tespit edilmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

KOYUNCU, J. Y., ÜNAL, H. S. (2019). THE IMPACT OF ECONOMIC FREEDOM ON THE SHADOW ECONOMY: PANEL ANALYSIS. SOSYAL BİLİMLER METİNLERİ, Cilt: 2019 - Sayı: 2, 35–46. https://ajindex.com/articles/421730

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Baker, D.G. (2016). The Informal Economy in the United States: Size, Determinants, and Comparisons. In M. Edelbacher, P. C. Kratcoski & B. Dobovšek (Eds.), Corruption, Fraud, Organized Crime, and the Shadow Economy (pp. 183-88).
  2. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, Taylor & Francis. Belasen, A. R., & Hafer, R. W. (2012). Well-being and economic freedom: Evidence from the states. Intelligence, 40(3), 306-316.
  3. Berdiev, A. N., Saunoris, J. W., & Schneider, F. (2018). Give me liberty, or I will produce underground: Effects of economic freedom on the shadow economy. Southern Economic Journal, 85(2), 537-562.
  4. Bratton, M. (1989). The politics of government-NGO relations in Africa. World Development, 17(4), 569-587.
  5. Buehn, A., & Schneider, F. (2009). Corruption and the shadow economy: a structural equation model approach. IZA Discussion Paper No: 4182. Clark, J. R., & Lawson, R. A. (2008). The impact of economic growth, tax policy and economic freedom on income inequality. The Journal of Private Enterprise, Fall. Dell'Anno, R. (2007). The shadow economy in Portugal: An analysis with the MIMIC approach. Journal of Applied Economics, 10(2), 253-277.
  6. Dronca, A. T. (2016). The influence of fiscal freedom, government effectiveness and human development index on tax evasion in the European Union. Theoretical & Applied Economics, 23(4). Edelbacher, M., Dobovsek, B., & Kratcoski, P. C. (2016). The Relationship of the Informal Economy to Corruption, Fraud, and Organized Crime. In M. Edelbacher, P. C. Kratcoski & B. Dobovšek (Eds.), Corruption, Fraud, Organized Crime, and the Shadow Economy (pp. 1-6).
  7. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, Taylor & Francis. Enste, D. H. (2010a). Shadow economy–the impact of regulation in OECD-countries. International Economic Journal, 24(4), 555-571.
  8. Enste, D. H. (2010b). Regulation and shadow economy: empirical evidence for 25 OECD-countries. Constitutional Political Economy, 21(3), 231-248.
  9. Goel, R. K., & Nelson, M. A. (2005). Economic freedom versus political freedom: cross‐country influences on corruption. Australian Economic Papers, 44(2), 121-133.
  10. Graeff, P., & Mehlkop, G. (2003). The impact of economic freedom on corruption: different patterns for rich and poor countries. European Journal of Political Economy, 19(3), 605-620.
  11. Hassan, M., & Schneider, F. (2016). Size and development of the shadow economies of 157 countries worldwide: Updated and new measures from 1999 to 2013. IZA Discussion Paper No. 10281. Miller, T., Kim, A. B., Roberts, J. M. & Tyrell,