Journals / Sosyal Bilimler Araştırma Dergisi / 2019 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 1

Asymmetric Effect of Globalization on the Interest Rates on External Debt: The Case of Turkey

Pages
189–193
Publication Date
2019-03-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Estimation results show that there is a statistically significant nonlinear relationship between globalization and the interest rate on external debt for the case of Turkey.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study empirically examines the short-run and long-run asymmetry between the series of globalization and the interest rate on external debt for the years from 1970 to 2015 for Turkey by employing the Nonlinear Auto-Regressive Distributed Lag (NARDL) model.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Estimation results show that there is a statistically significant nonlinear relationship between globalization and the interest rate on external debt for the case of Turkey.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Diagnostic test results also reveal that our model does not contain any problems of autocorrelation, heteroscedasticity, misspecification, and non-normality.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:2015 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Globalization · Long-term Interest Rates · Capital Inflows

Abstract

This study empirically examines the short-run and long-run asymmetry between the series of globalization and the interest rate on external debt for the years from 1970 to 2015 for Turkey by employing the Nonlinear Auto-Regressive Distributed Lag (NARDL) model. Estimation results show that there is a statistically significant nonlinear relationship between globalization and the interest rate on external debt for the case of Turkey. We identified a long-run but not a short-run asymmetry between two series. According to the findings, when the degree of globalization in Turkey increases by 1%, then the interest rate on the external debt commitments drops by 3.43%. On the other hand, the interest rate on external debt commitments rises by 3.07% in the long-run when the degree of globalization drops by 1%. Diagnostic test results also reveal that our model does not contain any problems of autocorrelation, heteroscedasticity, misspecification, and non-normality.

Özet

This study empirically examines the short-run and long-run asymmetry between the series of globalization and the interest rate on external debt for the years from 1970 to 2015 for Turkey by employing the Nonlinear Auto-Regressive Distributed Lag (NARDL) model. Estimation results show that there is a statistically significant nonlinear relationship between globalization and the interest rate on external debt for the case of Turkey. We identified a long-run but not a short-run asymmetry between two series. According to the findings, when the degree of globalization in Turkey increases by 1%, then the interest rate on the external debt commitments drops by 3.43%. On the other hand, the interest rate on external debt commitments rises by 3.07% in the long-run when the degree of globalization drops by 1%. Diagnostic test results also reveal that our model does not contain any problems of autocorrelation, heteroscedasticity, misspecification, and non-normality.

🔖

Cite This Article

YILMAZ, R., KOYUNCU, J. Y. (2019). Asymmetric Effect of Globalization on the Interest Rates on External Debt: The Case of Turkey. Sosyal Bilimler Araştırma Dergisi, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 1, 189–193. https://ajindex.com/articles/801704

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (5)

  1. Bertaut, C., DeMarco, L. P., Kamin, S. and Tryon, R. (2012). ABS inflows to the United States and the global financial crisis. Journal of International Economics, 88(2), 219–34.
  2. Carvalho, D. and Fidora, M. (2015). Capital inflows and euro area long-term interest rates. The European Central Bank (ECB) Working Paper Series No: 1798, Frankfurt, Germany: The European Central Bank (ECB). https://www.ecb.europa.eu/pub/pdf/scpwps/ecbwp1798.en.pdf?cce679c384cc11837abd7f125ddc5bed
  3. Pesaran, M. H., Shin, Y., and Smith, R. J. (2001). Bounds testing approaches to the analysis of level relationships. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 16(3), 289–326.
  4. Shin, Y., Yu, B., Greenwood-Nimmo, M. (2014). Modelling asymmetric cointegration and dynamic multipliers in an ARDL framework. In: W.C. Horrace & R.C. Sickles (Eds.), Festschrift in Honor of Peter Schmidt (pp. 281-314).
  5. New York, NY: Springer Science & Business Media. Warnock, F.E. and Warnock, V.C. (2009). International capital flows and U.S. interest rates. Journal of International Money and Finance, 28(6), 903–19.