Journals / Türkiye İletişim Araştırmaları Dergisi / 2008 / Cilt: 13 - Sayı: 13

Postmodern Impacts on the Consumption Patterns, Activities and Theories

Pages
215–231
Publication Date
2014-04-07
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

However, it’s reveal that this subject is highly comprehensive and the evaluation of the conclusions would be a subject for a wider and more comprehensive study.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This paper investigated the postmodernist notion of consumption and attempts to identify some of the concerns raised by postmodern.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The study proposes a methodology basedon showing sample case advertisements and consumption forms for the revealing postmodern impacts on consumption and for interpreting the meaning and understanding the structure of such consumption forms.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:However, it’s reveal that this subject is highly comprehensive and the evaluation of the conclusions would be a subject for a wider and more comprehensive study.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Postmodernizm · tüketim · üst-gerçeklik

Abstract

This paper investigated the postmodernist notion of consumption and attempts to identify some of the concerns raised by postmodern. The study proposes a methodology basedon showing sample case advertisements and consumption forms for the revealing postmodern impacts on consumption and for interpreting the meaning and understanding the structure of such consumption forms. In the research, it’s stated that from the postmodern perspective on consumption, hyperreality, fragmentation, decentring of the subject, commodification of nostalgia and brand community forms are essential characteristics. However, it’s reveal that this subject is highly comprehensive and the evaluation of the conclusions would be a subject for a wider and more comprehensive study.

Özet

Bu çalışma, postmodern olarak adlandırılan tüketim biçimini araştırıp, postmodernizm sürecinde yaşanan bazı konuları aydınlatmayı amaçlamaktadır. Makale kapsamında yürütülen araştırma, tüketim etkinlikleri üzerindeki postmodern dönemde oluşan etkileri ortaya çıkarmak, bu tip bir tüketimin anlamını araştırmak ve yapısını ortaya koymak amacıyla, bütünce olarak belirlenen reklamları ve tüketim biçimlerini örnek olarak ortaya koymaktadır. Çalışma kapsamında, postmodern olarak adlandırılan tüketim biçiminin temel karakterlerinin üst-gerçeklik, parçalanma, öznenin merkezleştirilmemesi, nostaljinin metalaştırılması ve marka topluluğu biçimi olduğu belirtilmiştir. Bunun yanında, konunun oldukça ayrıntılı olduğu vurgulanmış ve bu nedenle konu hakkında daha ayrıntılı bir çalışma gerçekleştirmenin zorunluluğu ifade edilmiştir

🔖

Cite This Article

BATI, U. (2014). Postmodern Impacts on the Consumption Patterns, Activities and Theories. Türkiye İletişim Araştırmaları Dergisi, Cilt: 13 - Sayı: 13, 215–231. https://ajindex.com/articles/4215

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (19)

  1. Barthes, Roland (1990).
  2. Çağdaş Söylenler. Tr., Tahsin Yücel, İstanbul:
  3. Hürriyet Vakfı Publications. Barthes, R. (1999). The Old Rhetoric in The Semiotic Challenge, Tr., Richard Howard, New York: Hill&Wang. Baudrillard Jean. (2003),
  4. Simulakrlar ve Simulasyon. Tr., Oğuz Adanır, İstanbul:
  5. Doğu Batı Publications. Baudrillard, Jean (2004).
  6. Tüketim Toplumu. Tr., Hazal Deliçaylı ve Ferda Keskin, İstanbul:
  7. Ayrıntı Publications. Blattberg, R.C. and Deighton, J. (1991, “Interactive marketing: exploiting the age of addressability”, Harvard Business Review, Fall, pp. 5-14.). Brown, Stephen (1994). Marketing as multiplex: Screening postmodernism, European Journal of Marketing. Bradford: 1994. Vol. 28, Iss. 8,9; pg. 27-52
  8. Brown, Stephen (1995). Postmodern Marketing. Londra: Routledge. Brown, Stephen (1999). Retro-marketing: yesterday’s tomorrows, today! Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 17/7, pp. 363-376
  9. Cova, B. (1997), “Community and Consumption. Towards A Definition Of The ‘Linking Value’ of Product of Services”, European Journal of Marketing, Vol. 31 No. 3/4, pp.297-316.
  10. Cova, Bernard & Véronique Cova (2002). “Tribal Marketing: The Tribalisation of Society and Its Impact on the Conduct of Marketing.” European Journal of Marketing, Vol. 36, N. 5/6, 2002, pp.595-620.
  11. Davis, F. (1979). A yearning for yesterday: “A sociology of nostalgia.’’ London: Collyer MacMillan. Debord, Guy (1996).
  12. Gösteri Toplumu. Tr., A. Ekmekçi ve O.Taşkent. İstanbul:
  13. Ayrıntı Publications. Dittmar, H. (1992). The Social Psychology of Material Possessions: ‘’To Have is to Be. Hemel Hempstead’’: Harvester Wheatheaf. Douglas, M. (1982). In the Active Voice. London: Routledge Douglas, M. ve Isherwood, B. (1999).
  14. Tüketimin Antropolojisi. Tr., E. Attila Aytekin, İstanbul:
  15. Dost Publications. Elliott R. (1994). “Addictive Consumption: Function and Fragmentation in Postmodernity”, Journal of Consumer Policy, Vol. 17, pp.159-179.
  16. Ewen, Stuart (1976). Captains of Consciousness. New York: McGraw-Hill. Featherstone, M. (1996). Postmodernizm ve Tüketim Kültürü. Tr., Mehmet Küçük, İstanbul:
  17. Ayrıntı Publications. Firat, A. & Venkatesh, A. (1993). “Postmodernity; The Age of Marketing,” International Journal of Research in Marketing, Vol 10, pp.227-49.
  18. Firat, A.F. and Venkatesh, A. (1995), “Liberatory postmodernism and the re-enchantment of consumption”, Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 22 No. 3, pp. 239-67
  19. Firat, A.F., Dholakia, N. and Venkatesh, A. (1995), ``Marketing in a postmodern world’, European Journal