Journals / Düzce Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi / 2010 / Cilt: 12 - Sayı: 3

Retrospective Analyses Of The Acute Pancreatitis With Patients In The West Black Sea

Batı Karadeniz Bölgesindeki Akut Pankreatitli Hastaların Retrospektif Analizi

Pages
45–49
Publication Date
2010-12-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Overall mortality in severe AP, as observed in patients with the diagnosis, treatment and follow-up was important in these patients

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Introduction: In these study patients who were our clinic with an etiology, diagnosis and treatment methods, morbidity, mortality and effect of Ranson criteria to prognosis were examined retrospectively.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Material and Method: In the study 44 mild and 18 severe total 62 AP cases among 2003-2008 at the General Surgery of Duzce University were analyzed retrospectively.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Overall mortality in severe AP, as observed in patients with the diagnosis, treatment and follow-up was important in these patients
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2003-2008 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Retrospektif Analiz · Akut Pankreatit · Batı Karadeniz Bölgesi

Abstract

Introduction: In these study patients who were our clinic with an etiology, diagnosis and treatment methods, morbidity, mortality and effect of Ranson criteria to prognosis were examined retrospectively. Material and Method: In the study 44 mild and 18 severe total 62 AP cases among 2003-2008 at the General Surgery of Duzce University were analyzed retrospectively. Results: A etiologic factor was 40 (66,7 %), gallstone 11 (17, 7%) idiopathic, 4 (6,4 %) hyperlipidemia, 3 (4,8%) alchol-hyperlipidemia, 2 (3,2 %) alcohol, 2 (3,2 %) after ERCP complications. Patients were followed up with a diagnosis of acute pancreatitis, the average age of 59.6 and 23 (37%) were man, 39 (63%) were woman. ERCP were performed to 14 patients with billiary pancreatitis 2 patients for the persistent billiary pancreatitis and for the 6 patients cholecystitis accompanied pancreatitis in the first 48 hours period, 23 patients following the acute pancreatitis attack were performed cholecystectomy. Acute pancreatitis patients first 6 cases of biliary 3 reputations have been switched to laparoscopic open cholecystectomy is being performed. 3 patients peritoneal lavage under local anesthesia, 4 patients’ diagnostic laparoscopy and 2 patients nerosectomy were performed. Mean hospitalization times were 9.8 days for mild and 11.2 days severe. In the severe group idiopathic a etiology 3 (4.8 %) patients were exitus. Conclusion: Acute pancreatitis is a disease that can watch a high mortality rate. Biliary factors were the most common etiological factor. Idiopathic AP played a role in second place and we have observed that the effect of alcohol is quite low. In biliary acute pancreatitis ERCP is a useful method in the first stage. Overall mortality in severe AP, as observed in patients with the diagnosis, treatment and follow-up was important in these patients

Özet

Giriş: Bu çalışma ile kliniğimizde akut pankreatit tanısıyla takip edilen hastaların etiyoloji,tanı ve tedavi yöntemleri, morbidite, mortalite ve Ranson kriterlerinin prognoza etkisiretrospektif olarak analiz edildi. Gereç ve Yöntem: Düzce Üniversitesi Genel Cerrahi Anabilim Dalı’nda 2003–2008 yıllarında44’ ü (%70.9) ) hafif, 18’ i (%29.1) şiddetli toplam 62 Akut Pankreatit (AP) vakası retrospektifolarak analiz edilmiştir. Bulgular: Akut pankreatitin etiyolojik nedenlerden safra taşı 40 (%64,5), idiyopatik 11 ( %17.7), hiperlipidemi 4 (% 6.4), alkol-hiperlipidemi 3 (%4.8), alkol 2 (%3,2), ERCP sonrası 2(%3.2) idi. Akut pankreatit tanısıyla takip edilen hastaların ortalama yaşı 59.6 (18 – 84) olup,23 (%37)'si erkek, 39 (% 63) 'sı da kadın idi. Biliyer pankreatitli 40 hastanın 14'üneEndoskopik Retrograd Kolanjiopankreatografi (ERCP) uygulandı. Biliyer pankreatitlihastaların, 2 sine de persistan biliyer pankreatit nedeniyle, 6 sına da kolesistit eşlik ettiği içinilk 48 saat içinde, 23 hastaya da akut atak sonrası kolesistektomi uygulanmıştır. Bilierpankreatitli İlk 6 vakanın 3’ üne laporoskopik kolesistektomi yapılırken açığa geçildi. Lokalanestezi altında 2 hastaya peritoneal lavaj, 4’üne tanısal diyagnostik laparoskopi, 2 ‘sine denekroz eksizyonu yapıldı. Ortalama hastanede kalış süresi hafif olgular için 9.8, ağır olgulariçin 11.2 gündü. Şiddetli gruptan etiyolojisi idiyopatik olan 3 ( % 4,8) hasta exitus olmuştur.Sonuç: Akut pankreatit mortalitesi yüksek seyredebilen bir hastalıktır. Akut pankreatitetiyolojisinde en sık biliyer nedenler rol oynamaktadır. İdiyopatik AP ikinci sıklıkta rol oynadığı,alkol oranının oldukça düşük olduğu izlenmiştir. Biliyer pankreatitli olguların tedavisinde ilkaşamada ERCP faydalı bir yöntemdir. Mortalitenin genelde Şiddetli AP’ li hastalarda gözlendiğigibi tanı,tedavi ve takip bu hastalarda önem arz etmiştir

🔖

Cite This Article

TAŞKIN, A. K., ÖZAYDIN, İ., DEMİRARAN, Y., YAŞAR, M. (2010). Retrospective Analyses Of The Acute Pancreatitis With Patients In The West Black Sea. Düzce Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 12 - Sayı: 3, 45–49. https://ajindex.com/articles/420257

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Violi V, De Bernardinis M, Boselli AS, Maggiore SM, Roncoroni L. The prognostic evaluation of acute pancreatitis Acta Biomed Ateneo Parmense. 1995;66(1-2):35-44.
  2. Kimura Y, Takada T, Kawarada Y, et al. JPN Guidelines for the management of acute pancreatitis: treatment of gallstone- induced acute pancreatitis. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 2006; 13:56-60.
  3. Al- Bahrani AZ, Ammori BJ. Clinical laboratory assessment of acute pancreatitis. Clinica Chimica Acta 2005; 362:26-48.
  4. Byrne MF, Mitchell RM, Stiffler H, Jowell PS, Branch MS, Pappas TN, Tyler D, Baillie J. Extensive investigationof patients with mild elevations of serum amylase and /or lipase is dlow yield. Can J Gastroenterol 2002;16;849-854.
  5. Kimura Y, Takada T, Kawarada Y, Hirata K, Mayumi T, Yoshida M, Sekimoto M, Hirota M, Takeda K, Isaji S, Koizumi M, Satake K, Otsuki M, Matsuno S.JPN Guidelenes for managemet pancreatitis: epidemiology, etyologi natural history,and outcome predictors in acute Pancreatitis. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 2006;13:10-24. Larvin M. Assessment of severity and prognosis in acute pancreatitis. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 1997 Feb;9(2):122- 30. Beaux Ac, Palmer KR, Carter DC. Factors influencing morbidity and mortality in acute pancreatitis; an analysis of 279 cases. Gut 1995;37:121-126.
  6. Yokoi H, Naganuma T, Higashiguchi T. Prospektive study of protocol for selection treatment of acute pancreatitis based on scaring severity. Digestion 1999;60:14-18. Wyncoll DL. The management of severe acute necrotising pancreatitis: an evidence-based review of the literature. Intensive Care Med. 1999 Feb;25(2):146-56.
  7. Tran DD, Cuesta MA:Evaluation of severity in paitents with acute pancreatitis.Am J Gastroenterol 1992;87:604-608.
  8. Ertekin C, Kemertaş K, Günay K. Akut Pankreatit Ulusal Travma Dergisi 1995,1:14-21. İşler M. Özütemiz Ö. Batur Y. Akut Pankreatit: 119 olgunun irdelenmesi. Klinik ve Deneysel Cerrahi Dergisi 1:244-251. 1993.
  9. Johnson CD. “Idiopathic” Pancreatitis.Do we need to know the cause In. London.Springer-Verlog 311-9.1991.
  10. Taşkın B, Nazlı O, Çökmez A, Özdemir D, Başaran A, Deniz S Akut Pankreatit Olgularının Değerlendirilmesi Klinik ve Deneysel Cerrahi Dergisi 1995; 3 (4): 235. Vriens PW, Linde P, Solotema ET, Warmerdam PE, Breslau PJ. Computed tomography severity index is an early prognostic tool for acute pancreatitis. J Am Coll Surg 2005; 201(4):497-502.
  11. McMahon MJ, Playforth MJ, Pickford IR. A comparative study of methods for the prediction of severity of acute pancreatiti