Journals / Sigma Mühendislik ve Fen Bilimleri Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 38 - Sayı: 2

A COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVE IN SUSTAINABLE SUPPLIER SELECTION BY INTEGRATED MCDM TECHNIQUES

Pages
835–852
Publication Date
2021-06-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Results show that the three applied fuzzy integrated methods reach similar supplier rankings and the economic perspective between the three dimensions of sustainability is held the first rank.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In recent years, concept of sustainability has emerged with increasing awareness of environment-friendly practices and social issues of organizations, researchers, and the business community.
📊
Key Findings & Data:For this reason, enterprises have integrated this concept into supply chain management (SCM) by revising on supply chains.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Results show that the three applied fuzzy integrated methods reach similar supplier rankings and the economic perspective between the three dimensions of sustainability is held the first rank.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Foundry sector · fuzzy AHP · fuzzy TOPSIS

Abstract

In recent years, concept of sustainability has emerged with increasing awareness of environment-friendly practices and social issues of organizations, researchers, and the business community. For this reason, enterprises have integrated this concept into supply chain management (SCM) by revising on supply chains. In this study, the sustainability concept is combined with the supplier selection process and an integrated approach is proposed to identify best sustainable suppliers. Because of the uncertainties present in individual judgments in sustainable supplier selection (SSS), fuzzy integrated multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) methods are applied in this study. Sustainability criteria are identified from the existing literature and narrowed by NGT (Nominal Group Technique) to build a consensus in group decision-making. A two-stage approach is reported after the identification of criteria and suppliers. In the first stage, the fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) approach is used to obtain the weights of the SSS criteria and the fuzzy TOPSIS, fuzzy VIKOR and fuzzy MULTIMOORA methods are used to generate the ranking of sustainable suppliers in the second stage. The validity and effectiveness of the proposed approach is illustrated in a foundry manufacturer through a case study. Results show that the three applied fuzzy integrated methods reach similar supplier rankings and the economic perspective between the three dimensions of sustainability is held the first rank.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÇALIK, A. (2021). A COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVE IN SUSTAINABLE SUPPLIER SELECTION BY INTEGRATED MCDM TECHNIQUES. Sigma Mühendislik ve Fen Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 38 - Sayı: 2, 835–852. https://ajindex.com/articles/418955

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Büyüközkan, G (2012) An integrated fuzzy multi-criteria group decision-making approach for green supplier evaluation. International Journal of Production Research 50, 2892–2909.
  2. Govindan, K, Sivakumar, R (2016) Green supplier selection and order allocation in a low-carbon paper industry: integrated multi-criteria heterogeneous decision-making and multi-objective linear programming approaches. Annals of Operations Research 238, 243–276.
  3. Rajeev, A, Pati, RK, Padhi, SS, Govindan, K (2017) Evolution of sustainability in supply chain management: A literature review. Journal of Cleaner Production 162, 299–314.
  4. Hong, J, Zhang, Y, Ding, M (2018) Sustainable supply chain management practices, supply chain dynamic capabilities, and enterprise performance. Journal of Cleaner Production 172, 3508–3519.
  5. Türkiye Döküm Sanayi (2013) 2013 Yılına Girerken Mevcut Durum [6] Banaeian, N, Mobli, H, Fahimnia, B, et al (2018) Green supplier selection using fuzzy group decision making methods: A case study from the agri-food industry. Computers & Operations Research 89, 337–347.
  6. Govindan, K, Khodaverdi, R, Jafarian, A (2013) A fuzzy multi criteria approach for measuring sustainability performance of a supplier based on triple bottom line approach. Journal of Cleaner Production 47, 345–354.
  7. Luthra, S, Govindan, K, Kannan, D, et al (2017) An integrated framework for sustainable supplier selection and evaluation in supply chains. Journal of Cleaner Production 140, 1686–1698.
  8. Azadnia, AH, Saman, MZM, Wong, KY (2015) Sustainable supplier selection and order lot-sizing: an integrated multi-objective decision-making process. International Journal of Production Research 53, 383–408.
  9. Bai, C, Sarkis, J (2010) Integrating sustainability into supplier selection with grey system and rough set methodologies. International Journal of Production Economics 124, 252–264.
  10. Azadi, M, Jafarian, M, Farzipoor Saen, R, Mirhedayatian, SM (2015) A new fuzzy DEA model for evaluation of efficiency and effectiveness of suppliers in sustainable supply chain management context