Journals / Sigma Mühendislik ve Fen Bilimleri Dergisi / 2015 / Cilt: 33 - Sayı: 4

DENITRIFICATION OF NITRATE BY COMBINED ULTRASOUND AND ZERO VALENT MAGNESIUM AT pH CONTROLLED CONDITIONS

Pages
489–501
Publication Date
2015-09-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

As more ultrasonic power and magnesium dose were applied, the rate of conversion of nitrate to nitrogen gas increased significantly.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, ultrasound (US), zero-valent magnesium (Mg0) and their simultaneous combination were tested at different Mg0 doses (0.5, 1, 1.5, 2 ve 2.5 g/L), pH values (2, 4, 7 ve 9) and ultrasonic powers (30, 60 ve 90 W) for nitrate reduction.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Ultrasound alone was found to be ineffective for nitrate removal at different pH values.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:As more ultrasonic power and magnesium dose were applied, the rate of conversion of nitrate to nitrogen gas increased significantly.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Ultrasound · zero valent magnesium · nitrate reduction

Abstract

In this study, ultrasound (US), zero-valent magnesium (Mg0) and their simultaneous combination were tested at different Mg0 doses (0.5, 1, 1.5, 2 ve 2.5 g/L), pH values (2, 4, 7 ve 9) and ultrasonic powers (30, 60 ve 90 W) for nitrate reduction. Ultrasound alone was found to be ineffective for nitrate removal at different pH values. Effect of ultrasonic power for pH controlled operation, nitrate reduction was increased with increasing dose of magnesium powder. Ultrasound induced profound effects on denitrification capacity of magnesium particles. For example, with controlling pH at 4, 95% of initial nitrate was reduced by 2.5 g/L of magnesium powder within 60 min, while keeping the applying combined US/Mg0 for 30, 60, and 90 W ultrasonic powers at the same dose, required durations to achieve at the same nitrate removal efficiencies were determined to be approximately 30, 20 and 20 min, respectively. When pH was controlled at 7 and 9, up to 70% of nitrate was removed by 2.5 g Mg0/L dose after 60 min , but in the same conditions with 90 W ultrasonic power a complete nitrate reduction was attained only within 30 min. Effect of ultrasonic on magnesium surface activation and nitrate removal was arised more clearly at alkaline conditions, when particle surface passivation was increased at increased pH . Nitrogen gas (N2), nitrite (NO2-) and ammonium/ammonia (NH4+/NH3) were detected as the major denitrification by-products following US/Mg0 treatment. As more ultrasonic power and magnesium dose were applied, the rate of conversion of nitrate to nitrogen gas increased significantly.

🔖

Cite This Article

İLERİ, B., APAYDIN, Ö., AYYILDIZ, Ö. (2015). DENITRIFICATION OF NITRATE BY COMBINED ULTRASOUND AND ZERO VALENT MAGNESIUM AT pH CONTROLLED CONDITIONS. Sigma Mühendislik ve Fen Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 33 - Sayı: 4, 489–501. https://ajindex.com/articles/418681

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Harter T., (2009). Agricultural Impacts on Groundwater Nitrate, Nitrates in Groundwater, Southwest Hydrology Magazine, 8 (4), 1–38
  2. Almasri M.N., (2007). Nitrate Contamination of Groundwater: A conceptual Management Framework, Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 27 (3), 220–242
  3. Almasri M.N., Kaluarachchi J.J., (2004). Assessment and Management of Long-term Nitrate Pollution of Groundwater in Agriculture-dominated Watersheds, Journal of Hydrology, 295 (1-4), 225–245
  4. Doğanlar D.U., (2006). Effects of Wastewater Irrigation on Groundwater Quality, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi
  5. Grawal G.D., Lunkad S.K., Malkhed T., (1999). Diffuse Agricultural Nitrate Pollution of Groundwaters in India, Water Science and Technology, 39 (3), 67–75
  6. Keeney D., Olson R.A., (1986). Sources of Nitrate to Groundwater, Critical Reviews in Environmental Control,16 (3), 257−304
  7. İnsani Tüketim Amaçlı Sular Hakkında Yönetmelik (İTASHK), Ankara, (2005)
  8. Samatya S., (2006). Removal of Toxic Species (NO3-, F-) From Water By Ion Exchange, Electrodialysis and Sorption Methods, (Ph.D.), Ege Üniversitesi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü
  9. Kapoor A., Viraraghavan T., (1997). Nitrate Removal from Drinking Water-Review, Journal of Environmental Engineering, 123 (4), 371−380
  10. Luk G. K., Au-Yeung W.C., (2002). Experimental Investigation on the Chemical Reduction of Nitrate from Groundwater, Advances Environmental Research, 6 (4), 441−453
  11. Crane R.A., Scott T.B., (2012). Nanoscale Zero-valent Iron: Future Prospects for an Emerging Water Treatment Technology, Journal of Hazardous Materials, 211−212, 112−125
  12. Hu H.Y., Goto N. ve Fujie K., (2001). Effect of pH on the Reduction of Nitrite in Water by Metallic Iron, Water Research, 35 (11), 2789–2793
  13. Zhang J., Hao Z., Zhang Z., Yang Y., Xu X., (2010). Kinetics of Nitrate Reductive Denitrification by Nanoscale Zero-valent Iron, Process Safety and Environmental Protection 8 (8), 439–445
  14. Tuğrul Z., (2006). Toz Halinde Fe0 ve Al0 ile Nitratın Kimyasal Denitrifikasyonu, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü
  15. Kumar M., Chakraborty S., (2006). Chemical Denitrification of Water by Zero-valent Magnesium Powder, Journal of Hazardous Materials, 135 (1-3), 112−121
  16. Lee G., Park J., (2013). Reaction of Zero-valent Magnesium with Water: Potential Applications in Environmental Remediation, Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 10