Journals / Turkish archives of pediatrics (Online) / 2022 / Cilt: 57 - Sayı: 3

Clinicopathological Evaluation of Childhood Sacrococcygeal Germ Cell Tumors: A Single-Center Experience

Pages
329–334
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Sacrococcygeal germ cell tumors are ultimately a disease that can be successfully treated with multidisciplinary approach, accurate diagnosis in the antenatal and postnatal period, appropriate surgical intervention, and regular follow-up.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: We aimed to evaluate the cases of sacrococcygeal germ cell tumors diagnosed in our hospital between 2006 and June 2021.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and Methods::We evaluated 38 sacrococcygeal germ cell tumors cases in our series in terms of age, sex, clinical complaints, localization, macroscopy, tumor size, histopathological diagnosis, surgical, postoperative complications, treatment, recurrence, and prognosis.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Sacrococcygeal germ cell tumors are ultimately a disease that can be successfully treated with multidisciplinary approach, accurate diagnosis in the antenatal and postnatal period, appropriate surgical intervention, and regular follow-up.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2006 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Objective: We aimed to evaluate the cases of sacrococcygeal germ cell tumors diagnosed in our hospital between 2006 and June 2021. Materials and Methods::We evaluated 38 sacrococcygeal germ cell tumors cases in our series in terms of age, sex, clinical complaints, localization, macroscopy, tumor size, histopathological diagnosis, surgical, postoperative complications, treatment, recurrence, and prognosis. Results: The cases ranged from 1 day to 16 years of age; 14 cases were diagnosed with routine ultrasonographic examination during prenatal period while the rest of the cases most frequently presented with complaints of constipation. In terms of localization, 6 cases were type 1, 11 cases were type 2, 6 cases were type 3, and 15 cases were type 4. In the pathological evaluation, 25 cases were mature teratoma, 8 cases were immature teratoma, and 5 cases were pure yolk-sac tumor. In terms of complications, temporary colostomy was performed as a result of rupture during birth in 2 cases, disseminated intravascular coagulation at birth in 1 case, and colon injury in 2 cases. There was a recurrence in 2 of our cases. Thirty-seven of our cases were alive and 1 died. Alpha-fetoprotein level was high in 28 of our cases. Conclusion: In our series, type 4 cases were observed more frequently, contrary to the literature. We recommend to use a routine ultrasonography to patients who come to the clinic with complaints of constipation and inability to urinate and if a mass is detected, asking for alphafetoprotein for further follow-up. Sacrococcygeal germ cell tumors are ultimately a disease that can be successfully treated with multidisciplinary approach, accurate diagnosis in the antenatal and postnatal period, appropriate surgical intervention, and regular follow-up.

🔖

Cite This Article

HASBAY, B., CANPOLAT, T., AKTEKİN, E., GEZER, H. Ö., KELEŞ, Ş. D. (2022). Clinicopathological Evaluation of Childhood Sacrococcygeal Germ Cell Tumors: A Single-Center Experience. Turkish archives of pediatrics (Online), Cilt: 57 - Sayı: 3, 329–334. https://ajindex.com/articles/418283

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Huddart SN, Mann JR, Robinson K, et al. Sacrococcygeal teratomas: the UK Children’s Cancer Study Group’s experience. I. Neonatal. Pediatr Surg Int. 2003
  2. 19(1-2):47-51. [CrossRef] 2. Makin EC, Hyett J, Ade-Ajayi N, et al. Outcome of antenatally diagnosed sacrococcygeal teratomas: single-center experience (1993- 2004). J Pediatr Surg. 2006
  3. 41(2):388-393. [CrossRef] 3. Fumino S, Tajiri T, Usui N, et al. Japanese clinical practice guidelines for sacrococcygeal teratoma, 2017. Pediatr Int. 2019
  4. 61(7):672-678. [CrossRef] 4. Wessell A, Hersh DS, Ho C, Lumpkins KM, Groves MLA. Surgical treatment of a type IV cystic sacrococcygeal teratoma with intraspinal extension utilizing a posterior-anterior-posterior approach: a case report. Childs Nerv Syst. 2018
  5. 34(5):977-982. [CrossRef] 5. Niramis RN, Anuntkosol V, Buranakitjaroen V, et al. Long-term outcomes of sacrococcygeal germ cell tumors in infancy and childhood. Surg Res Pract. 2015
  6. 398549. 6. Peiró JL, Sbragia L, Scorletti F, Lim FY, Shaaban A. Management of fetal teratomas. Pediatr Surg Int. 2016
  7. 32(7):635-647. [CrossRef] 7. Abubakar AM, Nggada HA, Chinda JY. Sacrococcygeal teratoma in Northeastern Nigeria: 18 –years experience. Pediatr Surg Int. 2005
  8. Gucciardo L, Uyttebroek A, De Wever I, et al. Prenatal assessment and management of sacrococcygeal teratoma. Prenat Diagn. 2011
  9. 31(7):678-688. [CrossRef] 9. Barakat MA, Abdelaal SM, Saleh AM. Sacrococygeal teratoma in infants and children. Acta Neurochir. 2011
  10. Tuladhar R, Patole SK, Whitehall JS. Sacrococcygeal teratoma in the perinatal period. Postgrad Med J. 2000
  11. 76(902):754-759. [CrossRef] 11. Chisholm CA, Heider AL, Kuller JA, von Allmen D, McMahon MJ, Chescheir NC. Prenatal diagnosis and perinatal management of fetal sacrococcygeal teratoma. Am J Perinatol. 1999
  12. 16(1):47-50. [CrossRef] 12. Gabra HO, Jesudason EC, McDowell HP, Pizer BL, Losty PD. Sacrococcygeal teratoma--a 25-year experience in a UK regional center. J Pediatr Surg. 2006
  13. 41(9):1513-1516. [CrossRef] 13. Altman RP, Randolph JG, Lilly JR. Sacrococcygeal teratoma: American Academy of Pediatrics Surgical Section Survey. J Pediatr Surg. 1974
  14. 9(3):389-398. [CrossRef] 14. Wu JT, Book L, Sudar K. Serum alpha fetoprotein (AFP) levels in normal infants. Pediatr Res. 1981
  15. 15(1):50-52. [CrossRef] 15. Mindaye ET, Kassahun M, Prager S, Tufa TH. Adult case of giant sacrococcygeal teratoma: case report. BMC Surg. 2020
  16. 20(1):295. [CrossRef] 16. Xu X, Zhao F, Cheng X, et al. Adu