Journals / Turkish journal of vascular surgery / 2022 / Cilt: 31 - Sayı: 1

Mid- and long-term outcomes of extra-anatomic bypass procedures

Pages
53–58
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: An extra-anatomic bypass procedure is a surgical approach that can still be performed with low mortality and morbidity rates and acceptable patency rates in high-risk patients

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objectives: In this study, we report our mid- and long-term results of extra-anatomic bypass surgery.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Patients and methods: Between January 2005 and December 2011, a total of 65 patients (54 males, 11 females; mean age: 54.3±4.2 years; range, 20 to 82 years) with extra-anatomic bypass surgery with complete follow-up data were retrospectively analyzed.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: An extra-anatomic bypass procedure is a surgical approach that can still be performed with low mortality and morbidity rates and acceptable patency rates in high-risk patients
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2005 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Objectives: In this study, we report our mid- and long-term results of extra-anatomic bypass surgery. Patients and methods: Between January 2005 and December 2011, a total of 65 patients (54 males, 11 females; mean age: 54.3±4.2 years; range, 20 to 82 years) with extra-anatomic bypass surgery with complete follow-up data were retrospectively analyzed. Extra-anatomic bypass surgery was performed to the lower extremity in 36 (55.3%) and the upper extremity in 29 (44.7%) patients. Additional distal bypass surgery was done in 18 of 36 patients with lower extremity disease. Results: The median follow-up time was 3.6 years (range, 3 months to 6 years). There was no early mortality, while there were five reoperations due to graft thrombosis and two amputations due to insufficient arterial f low in the postoperative period. There were two reoperations due to graft thrombosis and graft infection as late morbidity. In the long-term, the mortality rate was 6% (n=4) related to the malignancy in two patients, pulmonary embolism in one patient, and aortoduodenal fistula in one patient. Conclusion: An extra-anatomic bypass procedure is a surgical approach that can still be performed with low mortality and morbidity rates and acceptable patency rates in high-risk patients

🔖

Cite This Article

ARSLAN, G., SELÇUK, İ. (2022). Mid- and long-term outcomes of extra-anatomic bypass procedures. Turkish journal of vascular surgery, Cilt: 31 - Sayı: 1, 53–58. https://ajindex.com/articles/417634

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Brewster DC. Aortoiliac, Aortofemoral and Iliofemoral Arteriosclerotic Occlusive Diseases. In: Hollier LH, Strandness DE, Townc JB, Calligaro K, Kent KC, Moneta GL, et al. Haimovici’s Vascular Surgery 5th ed. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing; 2004. p. 499-521
  2. Ascher E, Veith FJ. Extraanatomic Bypasses. In: Hollier LH, Strandness DE, Townc JB, Calligaro K, Kent KC, Moneta GL, et al. Haimovici’s Vascular Surgery. 5th ed. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing; 2004. p. 625-636
  3. Passman MA, Taylor LM, Moneta GL, Edwards JM, Yeager RA, McConnell DB, et al. Comparison of axillofemoral and aortofemoral bypass for aortoiliac occlusive disease. J Vasc Surg 1996;23:263-9
  4. Hafız E, Gökaslan G, Aşam M, Kalbisağde EO, Karasu VE, Caner Ş, et al. Ekstra-anatomik crossover femoro- popliteal bypass cerrahisinin orta dönem sonuçları. Damar Cer Derg 2015;24:18-21
  5. Vogt DP, Hertzer NR, O'Hara PJ, Beven EG. Brachiocephalic arterial reconstruction. Ann Surg 1982;196:541-52
  6. AbuRahma AF, Robinson PA, Jennings TG. Carotid- subclavian bypass grafting with polytetraf luoroethylene grafts for symptomatic subclavian artery stenosis or occlusion: A 20-year experience. J Vasc Surg 2000;32:411-8
  7. Edwards WH Jr, Tapper SS, Edwards WH Sr, Mulherin JL Jr, Martin RS 3rd, Jenkins JM. Subclavian revascularization. A quarter century experience. Ann Surg 1994;219:673-7
  8. Modarai B, Ali T, Dourado R, Reidy JF, Taylor PR, Burnand KG. Comparison of extra-anatomic bypass grafting with angioplasty for atherosclerotic disease of the supra-aortic trunks. Br J Surg 2004;91:1453-7
  9. Mingoli A, Sapienza P, Feldhaus RJ, Di Marzo L, Burchi C, Cavallaro A. Femorofemoral bypass grafts: Factors influencing long-term patency rate and outcome. Surgery 2001;129:451-8
  10. Yuksel A, Cayir MC, Kumtepe G, Velioglu Y, Atli FH, Muduroglu A, et al. An overview and update of femorofemoral crossover bypass surgery as an extra- anatomic bypass procedure. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2018;66:266-72
  11. Urayama H, Ohtake H, Yokoi K, Fujimori H, Kawaguchi M, Ishikawa T, et al. Long-term results of endarterectomy, anatomic bypass and extraanatomic bypass for aortoiliac occlusive disease. Surg Today 1998;28:151-5. 12. do Carmo G, Moura CM, Sarmento C, Martins C, Pestana C, Macedo M, et al. A new approach for the surgical management of unilateral iliac artery occlusive disease: The iliofemoral crossover transposition. J Vasc Surg 2002;36:404-7
  12. Martin D, Katz SG. Axillofemoral bypass for aortoiliac occlusive diseas