Journals / Turkish journal of vascular surgery / 2022 / Cilt: 31 - Sayı: 1

Femoral nerve block versus spinal anesthesia in the treatment of saphenous vein ablation

Pages
7–14
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: Femoral nerve block, which is used for intraoperative anesthesia during the procedure of endovenous laser ablation, can be preferred as an alternative method to spinal anesthesia.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objectives: This study aims to compare the effects of spinal anesthesia and femoral nerve block and to determine the optimal anesthesia method for embolization of vena saphena magna.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Patients and methods: Between December 2019 and March 2021, a total of 160 patients (89 males, 71 females; mean age: 44.4 years; range, 18 to 69 years) who were diagnosed with varicose veins and hospitalized for surgery in our cardiovascular surgery clinic were included.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: Femoral nerve block, which is used for intraoperative anesthesia during the procedure of endovenous laser ablation, can be preferred as an alternative method to spinal anesthesia.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2019 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Objectives: This study aims to compare the effects of spinal anesthesia and femoral nerve block and to determine the optimal anesthesia method for embolization of vena saphena magna. Patients and methods: Between December 2019 and March 2021, a total of 160 patients (89 males, 71 females; mean age: 44.4 years; range, 18 to 69 years) who were diagnosed with varicose veins and hospitalized for surgery in our cardiovascular surgery clinic were included. The patients were divided into two groups. The first group (Group S, n=80) underwent spinal anesthesia and the second group (Group F, n=80) underwent femoral nerve block for the surgical operation. Results: The mean arterial pressures (MAPs) were significantly lower in Group S compared to Group F. The mean time until surgery was earlier in Group S (4.57±1.0 min vs. 9.9±3.4 min, respectively; p<0.01). The mean duration of motor block was longer in Group S (3.4±1.1 h vs. 2.7±0.8 h, respectively; p<0.05). The mean duration of mobilization was statistically significantly shorter in Group F (6.1±1.7 h vs. 5.2±1.4, respectively; p<0.05). The development of urinary retention was statistically significantly higher in Group S (p<0.05). The mean patient satisfaction score after discharge was higher in Group F (3.5±0.5 vs. 2.9±0.8, respectively; p<0.05). The incidence of postoperative shivering was statistically significantly higher in Group S (p<0.05). Conclusion: Femoral nerve block, which is used for intraoperative anesthesia during the procedure of endovenous laser ablation, can be preferred as an alternative method to spinal anesthesia.

🔖

Cite This Article

KAÇMAZ, M., SERHATLIOĞLU, F. (2022). Femoral nerve block versus spinal anesthesia in the treatment of saphenous vein ablation. Turkish journal of vascular surgery, Cilt: 31 - Sayı: 1, 7–14. https://ajindex.com/articles/417630

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Rasmussen LH, Bjoern L, Lawaetz M, Blemings A, Lawaetz B, Eklof B. Randomized trial comparing endovenous laser ablation of the great saphenous vein with high ligation and stripping in patients with varicose veins: Short-term results. J Vasc Surg 2007;46:308-15
  2. Öztürk T, Çevikkalp E, Nizamoglu F, Özbakkaloğlu A, Topcu İ. The efficacy of femoral block and unilateral spinal anaesthesia on analgesia, haemodynamics and mobilization in patients undergoing endovenous ablation in the lower extremity. Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim 2016;44:91-5
  3. Van Den Bos RR, Neumann M, De Roos KP, Nijsten T. Endovenous laser ablation-induced complications: Review of the literature and new cases. Dermatol Surg 2009;35:1206-14
  4. Oğuzkurt L. Endovenous laser ablation for the treatment of varicose veins. Diagn Interv Radiol 2012;18:417-22
  5. Yavaşcaoğlu B, Kaya F, Özcan B, Uzunalioğlu S, Güven T, Yazıcı Ş, et al. Erişkinlerde anestezi sonrası görülen komplikasyonların retrospektif değerlendirilmesi. Uludağ Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi 2009;35:73-8
  6. Mazzaccaro DP, Stegher S, Occhiuto MT, Muzzarelli L, Malacrida G, Nano G. Varicose veins: New trends in treatment in a Vascular Surgery Unit. Ann Ital Chir 2016;87:166-71
  7. Dogru S, Kaya Z, Dogru H. Spinal anestezi komplikasyonları. Çağdaş Tıp Dergisi 2012;2:127-34
  8. Lafçı A. Spinal anesthesia versus general anesthesia with a laryngeal mask airway in patients undergoing radiofrequency ablation for varicose veins. Turk Gogus Kalp Dama 2017;25:388-93
  9. Bromage PR. A comparison of the hydrochloride and carbon dioxide salts of lidocaine and prilocaine in epidural analgesia. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand Suppl 1965;16:55-69
  10. Maiti S, Gharami B, Bhattacharya D, Ray AK. A comparative study of clinical effects of spinal bupivacaine versus sciatic-femoral nerve block (anterior approach) in high risk geriatric patient for lower limb orthopaedic procedures. JEMDS 2017;6:2422-28
  11. Yilmaz S, Ceken K, Alimoglu E, Sindel T. US-guided femoral and sciatic nerve blocks for analgesia during endovenous laser ablation. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2013;36:150-7
  12. Dzieciuchowicz L, Espinosa G, Grochowicz L. Evaluation of ultrasound-guided femoral nerve block in endoluminal laser ablation of the greater saphenous vein. Ann Vasc Surg 2010;24:930-4
  13. Al Wahbi AM. Evaluation of pain during endovenous laser ablation of the great saphenous vein with ultrasound- guided femoral nerve block. Vasc Health Risk Manag 2017;13:305-9. 14.