Journals / Turkish Journal of Surgery / 2021 / Cilt: 37 - Sayı: 4

Development of a local model for measuring the work of surgeons

Pages
371–378
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Proper measurement of the surgeon’s work is an important step towards establishing equity in payment in the health system.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: The Relative Value Unit (RVU) is the main method of calculating surgeons’ reimbursements and a tool for measuring the work of surgeons.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Existing evidence shows that the work Relative Value Unit (wRVU) does not accurately represent surgeon’s work.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Proper measurement of the surgeon’s work is an important step towards establishing equity in payment in the health system.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:2019 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Objective: The Relative Value Unit (RVU) is the main method of calculating surgeons’ reimbursements and a tool for measuring the work of surgeons. Existing evidence shows that the work Relative Value Unit (wRVU) does not accurately represent surgeon’s work. Therefore, the current study attempted to develop a local model to measure surgeons’ work. Material and Methods: This study was conducted in two main phases of determining the metrics and model development using quantitative and qualitative approaches from December 2019 to April 2021. Literature review, focused group discussions, and interviews were used to collect data. Content analysis and Exploratory Data Analysis techniques were applied to analyze data. Results: The findings demonstrated that patient’s conditions (age, severity of disease at referring time, and comorbidities), disease specifications (time, complexity, physical effort, and risk), and provider characteristic (surgeon’s willingness, imposed stress, and surgeon’s skill) were important by 17, 51, and 32%, respectively, in determining surgeons’ work. Conclusion: Determining a fixed value for each procedure does not accurately estimate the amount of required surgeon’s work for any procedure. Many factors, such as the patient’s condition, surgeon’s characteristics, and disease specification affect surgeons’ work in the operation room. Proper measurement of the surgeon’s work is an important step towards establishing equity in payment in the health system.

🔖

Cite This Article

FOROOTAN, S., HAJEBRAHİMİ, S., JANATİ, A., NAFAJİ, B., ASGHARİ-JAFARABADİ, M. (2021). Development of a local model for measuring the work of surgeons. Turkish Journal of Surgery, Cilt: 37 - Sayı: 4, 371–378. https://ajindex.com/articles/417617

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Baadh A, Peterkin Y, Wegener M, Flug J, Katz D, Hoffmann JC. The relative value unit: history, current use, and controversies. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol 2016; 45(2): 128-32
  2. Hsiao WC, Braun P, Dunn D, Becker ER. Resource-based relative values. An overview. JAMA 1988; 260(16): 2347-53
  3. Chiu RG, Siddiqui N, Nunna RS, Patel S, Rosinski CL, Chaker AN, et al. Association of neurosurgical work relative value units with objective markers of operative complexity. World Neurosurg 2021; 146: e194-e204
  4. Nguyen M, Moffatt-Bruce S. Relative value unit transformation: Our new reality of worth. Int J Acad Med 2016; 2(1): 52-6
  5. Hsiao WC, Braun P, Yntema D, Becker ER. Estimating physicians’ work for a resource-based relative-value scale. N Engl J Med 1988; 319 (13): 835-41
  6. Chon WJ, Pavlakis M, Witkowski P, Chen L, Kadambi P. RVU as a metric for productivity in transplant medicine: a survey of U.S. transplant nephrologists. 2016
  7. Gan ZS, Wood CM, Hayon S, Deal A, Smith AB, Tan Hung-Jui, et al. Correlation of relative value units with surgical complexity and physician workload in urology. Urology 2020; 139: 71-7
  8. Shah DR, Bold RJ, Yang AD, Khatri VP, Martinez SR, Canter RJ. Relative value units poorly correlate with measures of surgical effort and complexity. J Surg Res 2014; 190(2): 465-70
  9. Samuel LT, Grits D, Acuña AJ, Piuzzi NS, Higuera-Rueda CA, Kamath AF. Work relative value units do not adequately support the burden of infection management in revision knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2020; 102(3): 230-6
  10. Rosner MH, Falk RJ. Understanding work: Moving beyond the RVU. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2020; 15(7): 1053-5
  11. Orr RD, Sodhi N, Dalton SE, Khlopas A, Sultan AA, Chughtai M, et al. What provides a better value for your time? The use of relative value units to compare posterior segmental instrumentation of vertebral segments. Spine J 2018; 18(10): 1727-32
  12. Tufano J, Conrad DA, Sales A, Maynard C, Noren J, Kezirian E, et al. Effects of compensation method on physician behaviors. Am J Manag Care 2001; 7(4): 363-73
  13. Nyumba TO, Wilson K, Derrick CJ, Mukherjee N. The use of focus group discussion methodology: Insights from two decades of application in conservation. Methods Ecol Evol 2018; 9(1): 20-32
  14. Given LM (ed). The SAGE Encyclopedia of Qualitative Research Methods. Thousand Oaks, California 2008
  15. Elo S, Kääriäinen M, Kanste O, Pölkki T, Utriainen K, Kyngäs H. Qualitative content analysis:a focus on trustworthiness. SAG