Journals / Turkish Journal of Surgery / 2021 / Cilt: 37 - Sayı: 4

Is there an increasing trend of risk-reducing prophylactic mastectomy procedure in preventing breast cancer among women?

Pages
347–354
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Close surveillance, cancer screening, and chemoprevention methods should have priority.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: Prophylactic contralateral/bilateral mastectomy (PCM/PBM), as a risk-reducing mastectomy procedure, has a few evidence-based indications; however, there is an increasing trend in the total number of operations globally.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Worldwide famous actress Angelina Jolie was detected to have BRCA-1 mutation and underwent a prophylactic bilateral mastectomy in 2013.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Close surveillance, cancer screening, and chemoprevention methods should have priority.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2013 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Objective: Prophylactic contralateral/bilateral mastectomy (PCM/PBM), as a risk-reducing mastectomy procedure, has a few evidence-based indications; however, there is an increasing trend in the total number of operations globally. Worldwide famous actress Angelina Jolie was detected to have BRCA-1 mutation and underwent a prophylactic bilateral mastectomy in 2013. The procedure was perceived as ‘lifesaving’ worldwide, which eventually led to a significant increase in BRCA gene mutation analysis and PCM/PBM. In this study, it was aimed to evaluate our risk-reducing PCM/PBM results. Material and Methods: Twenty-seven patients underwent risk-reducing PCM/PBM between 2010-2018, but only 22 patients were included into the study. A retrospective analysis was carried out on demographics, family history, preoperative diagnoses, pathological findings, mastectomy details, reconstructive procedures, neoadjuvant chemotherapy, BRCA analysis, educational status, and mastectomy indications. Results: Surgical indications or major reasons for surgery were as follows: BRCA-1 mutation (n= 5), BRCA-2 mutation (n= 3), malignant-like areas in magnetic resonance imaging (n= 2), lobular carcinoma in situ (n= 3) and intense anxiety (n= 9). Eighteen patients (82%) underwent an additional reconstructive procedure via implantation or autologous tissue and four patients (18%) underwent mastectomy only. PCM/PBM by years was as: 2010 (n= 1), 2011 (n= 0), 2012 (n= 1), 2013 (n= 2), 2014 (n= 1), 2015 (n= 2), 2016 (n= 3), 2017 (n= 4), 2018 (n= 8), which represents the recently increasing trend. Conclusion: Risk-reducing PCM/PBM was performed in 59.1% of the patients (n= 13) for a significant medical reason, whereas for distress about a relapse or a new disease on the contralateral breast on the remaining 40.9% of the patients (n= 9). Evidence in the literature shows that risk-reducing mastectomy does not affect survival, although it lowers breast cancer incidence. Close surveillance, cancer screening, and chemoprevention methods should have priority.

🔖

Cite This Article

ARSLAN, B., TAZEOĞLU, D., DAĞ, A., BERKEŞOĞLU, M., ÖZDEMİR, A. A. (2021). Is there an increasing trend of risk-reducing prophylactic mastectomy procedure in preventing breast cancer among women?. Turkish Journal of Surgery, Cilt: 37 - Sayı: 4, 347–354. https://ajindex.com/articles/417615

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Fairbairn K, Cervantes A, Rayhrer C, Steen S. Trends in contralateral prophylactic mastectomy. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2020; 44(2): 323-9
  2. Nealon KP, Sobti N, Gadd M, Specht M, Liao EC. Assessing the additional surgical risk of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy and immediate breast implant reconstruction. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2020; 179(2): 255-65
  3. Wong SM, Freedman RA, Sagara Y, Aydogan F, Barry WT, Golshan M. Growing use of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy despite no improvement in long-term survival for invasive breast cancer. Ann Surg 2017 265(3): 581-9
  4. Kruper L, Kauffmann RM, Smith DD, Nelson RA. Survival analysis of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy: a question of selection bias. Ann Surg Oncol 2014 21(11): 3448-56
  5. Arpino G, Bardou VJ, Clark GM, Elledge RM. Infiltrating lobular carcinoma of the breast: tumor characteristics and clinical outcome. Breast Cancer Res 2004; 6(3): R149-56
  6. Yi M, Meric-Bernstam F, Middleton LP, Arun BK, Bedrosian I, Babiera GV. Predictors of contralateral breast cancer in patients with unilateral breast cancer undergoing contralateral prophylactic mastectomy. Cancer 2009 115(5): 962-71
  7. Evers C, Fischer C, Dikow N, and Schott S. Familial breast cancer: Genetic counseling over time, including patients’ expectations and initiators considering the Angelina Jolie effect PLoS One 2017; 12(5): e0177893
  8. Guillem JG, Wood WC, Moley JF, Berchuck A, Karlan BY, Mutch DG. ASCO/SSO review of the current role of risk-reducing surgery in common hereditary cancer syndromes. J Clin Oncol 2006; 24(28): 4642-60
  9. Parker PA, Peterson SK, Shen Y, Bedrosian I, Black DM, Thompson AM. Prospective study of psychosocial outcomes of having contralateral prophylactic mastectomy among women with nonhereditary breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 2018; 36(25): 2630-38
  10. Chowdhury M, Euhus D, Onega T, Biswas S, Choudhary PK. A model for individualized risk prediction of contralateral breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2017; 161(1): 153-60
  11. Reiner AS, John EM, Brooks JD, Lynch CF, Bernstein L, Mellemkjær L. Risk of a synchronous contralateral breast cancer in noncarriers of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations with a family history of breast cancer: a report from the Women’s Environmental Cancer and Radiation Epidemiology Study. J Clin Oncol 2013; 31(4): 433-9
  12. D’Alonzo M, Piva E, Pecchio S, Liberale V, Modaffari P, Ponzone R. Satisfaction and impact on quality of life of clinical and instrumental surveillance and prophy