Journals / The Anatolian Journal of Cardiology / 2022 / Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 6

Long-Term Results of Pulmonary Vein Isolation Plus Modified Posterior Wall Debulking Utilizing High-Power Short-Duration Strategy: An All-Comers Study in Real World

Pages
485–491
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: This study has demonstrated excellent arrhythmia-free outcomes in unselected, real world atrial fibrillation patients undergoing high-power short-duration pulmonary vein and debulking posterior wall isolations, however larger randomized trials are warranted.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Background: High-power short-duration radiofrequency ablation has improved lesion durability in pulmonary vein isolation.
📊
Key Findings & Data:High-power short-duration power delivery protocol was defined as 45 W at all ablation sites.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: This study has demonstrated excellent arrhythmia-free outcomes in unselected, real world atrial fibrillation patients undergoing high-power short-duration pulmonary vein and debulking posterior wall isolations, however larger randomized trials are warranted.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Background: High-power short-duration radiofrequency ablation has improved lesion durability in pulmonary vein isolation. In this study, we investigate long-term clinical outcomes of high-power short-duration pulmonary vein isolation and posterior wall debulking as an initial treatment modality in all corner atrial fibrillation patients. Methods: This is a single-center, retrospective, observational study including all patients who have undergone high-power short-duration pulmonary vein and posterior wall debulking, regardless of atrial fibrillation type and/or duration. High-power short-duration power delivery protocol was defined as 45 W at all ablation sites. Clinical and electrocardiographic follow-up were performed in all patients. Results: One hundred forty-two patients were enrolled in this study. Paroxysmal atrial fibrillation was present in 88 (62%) of patients. The mean follow-up of this study was 36.9 months ± 12.2 months. During the follow-up period, 10 patients (11.4%) with a diagnosis of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation had recurrence, while recurrence in patients with persistent and long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation was slightly higher (15 patients (28.1%) and 5 patients (50%), respectively). No major life-threatening complications occurred. Conclusion: This study has demonstrated excellent arrhythmia-free outcomes in unselected, real world atrial fibrillation patients undergoing high-power short-duration pulmonary vein and debulking posterior wall isolations, however larger randomized trials are warranted.

🔖

Cite This Article

CANDEMİR, B., BASKOVSKI, E., BETON, O., KOZLUCA, V., TAN, T. S., ALTIN, T., TUTAR, E. (2022). Long-Term Results of Pulmonary Vein Isolation Plus Modified Posterior Wall Debulking Utilizing High-Power Short-Duration Strategy: An All-Comers Study in Real World. The Anatolian Journal of Cardiology, Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 6, 485–491. https://ajindex.com/articles/417508

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Haïssaguerre M, Jaïs P, Shah DC, et al. Spontaneous initiation of atrial fibrillation by ectopic beats originating in the pulmonary veins. N Engl J Med. 1998
  2. 339(10):659-666. [CrossRef] 2. Lin WS, Tai CT, Hsieh MH, et al. Catheter ablation of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation initiated by non–pulmonary vein ectopy. Circulation. 2003
  3. 107(25):3176-3183. [CrossRef] 3. Hayashi K, An Y, Nagashima M, et al. Importance of nonpulmonary vein foci in catheter ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Heart Rhythm. 2015
  4. 12(9):1918-1924. [CrossRef] 4. Spragg D. Left atrial fibrosis: role in atrial fibrillation pathophysiology and treatment outcomes. J Atr Fibrillation. 2013
  5. 5(6):810. [CrossRef] 5. Salih M, Darrat Y, Ibrahim AM, et al. Clinical outcomes of adjunctive posterior wall isolation in persistent atrial fibrillation: a meta‐analysis. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2020
  6. 31(6):1394- 1402. [CrossRef] 6. Lee JM, Shim J, Park J, et al. The electrical isolation of the left atrial posterior wall in catheter ablation of persistent atrial fibrillation. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2019
  7. 5(11):1253-1261. [CrossRef] 7. Markman TM, Hyman MC, Kumareswaran R, et al. Durability of posterior wall isolation after catheter ablation among patients with recurrent atrial fibrillation. Heart Rhythm. 2020
  8. 17(10):1740- 1744. [CrossRef] 8. Yavin HD, Leshem E, Shapira-Daniels A, et al. Impact of highpower short-duration radiofrequency ablation on long-term lesion durability for atrial fibrillation ablation. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2020
  9. 6(8):973-985. [CrossRef] 9. Taghji P, El Haddad M, Phlips T, et al. Evaluation of a strategy aiming to enclose the pulmonary veins With contiguous and optimized radiofrequency lesions in paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: A Pilot Study. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2018
  10. 4(1):99-108. [CrossRef] 10. Candemir B, Baskovski E, Mammadov M, Esenboga K, Altin T. Triple gastrointestinal prophylactic therapy following highpower short-duration posterior left atrial wall ablation. Indian Heart J. 2020
  11. 72(4):306-308. [CrossRef] 11. Kim TH, Park J, Uhm JS, Joung B, Lee MH, Pak HN. Pulmonary vein reconnection predicts good clinical outcome after second catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation. Europace. 2017
  12. 19(6):961- 967. [CrossRef] 12. Ioannou A, Papageorgiou N, Lim WY, et al. Efficacy and safety of ablation index-guided catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation: an updated meta-analysis. Europace. 2020
  13. 22(11):1659-1671. [CrossRef] 13. Hussein A, Das M, Riva S, et al. Use