Journals / Turkish journal of vascular surgery / 2022 / Cilt: 31 - Sayı: 1

Endovascular abdominal aortic repair and concomitant intraprocedural endovascular interventions: Our single-center experience

Pages
15–24
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: Our study results demonstrate that endovascular treatment is a method that may be performed safely with a high technical success rate, and decreases perioperative mortality rate, aneurysm-related mortality rate, and time to discharge.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objectives: The aim of this study was to retrospectively evaluate patients who underwent endovascular treatment due to abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) and ruptured AAAs at our center, especially in terms of secondary interventions performed during endovascular treatment and to compare the obtained data with the current literature.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Patients and methods: A total of 137 patients underwent endovascular stent graft implantation due to AAA and ruptured AAA at our center, between 2004-2012.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: Our study results demonstrate that endovascular treatment is a method that may be performed safely with a high technical success rate, and decreases perioperative mortality rate, aneurysm-related mortality rate, and time to discharge.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2004-2012 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Objectives: The aim of this study was to retrospectively evaluate patients who underwent endovascular treatment due to abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) and ruptured AAAs at our center, especially in terms of secondary interventions performed during endovascular treatment and to compare the obtained data with the current literature. Patients and methods: A total of 137 patients underwent endovascular stent graft implantation due to AAA and ruptured AAA at our center, between 2004-2012. Eighty-one patients whose preoperative CT scans could be obtained were recruited in the study. Demographic data, preoperative aneurysm diameters, aneurysm neck lengths, neck angles, success rate for stent placement, perioperative mortality rate (<30 days), aneurysm-related mortality rate (<30 days), secondary intraprocedural endovascular interventions, and time of discharge from the hospital were evaluated. Results: Seventy-three of the patients were male and eight were female, and their ages were between 51-89 (mean: 70.1±8.8) years. The largest aneurysm diameters varied between 53 and 110 (mean: 63.8±12.9) mm. Aneurysm neck lengths varied between 0-60 (mean: 24.1±12.4) mm. The angle between aneurysm neck and suprarenal aorta was between 17-90 (mean: 34.9±15.9) degrees. Of our patients, 75 were treated due to AAA and 6 were treated due to ruptured AAA. The mean time of discharge from the hospital was 4.54±3.6 (range, 2-24) days for patients treated electively. The mean time of discharge from the hospital was 10.2±8.7 (range, 3-25) days for the six patients operated due to ruptured AAA. Perioperative mortality (<30 days) was not detected in any of the patients treated electively and perioperative mortality rate (<30 days) in ruptured AAA group was 16.6%. Aneurysm-related mortality (<30 days) was not detected in any of the 81 patients. Although secondary endovascular interventions were required in 14 of 81 patients (17.2%) during the procedure, stent graft placement success rate was found to be 100%. Conclusion: Our study results demonstrate that endovascular treatment is a method that may be performed safely with a high technical success rate, and decreases perioperative mortality rate, aneurysm-related mortality rate, and time to discharge. Concomitant interventions required during the procedure suggest that endovascular treatment must be performed by experienced teams with sufficient knowledge

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖZEN, Ö., HARMAN, A., AKAY, H. T. (2022). Endovascular abdominal aortic repair and concomitant intraprocedural endovascular interventions: Our single-center experience. Turkish journal of vascular surgery, Cilt: 31 - Sayı: 1, 15–24. https://ajindex.com/articles/417454

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. NICE 2020, Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm: Diagnosis and Management. Available at: https://www.nice.org.uk/ guidance/NG156. [Accessed: March 19, 2020] 2. Marsalese DL, Moodie DS, Vacante M, Lytle BW, Gill CC, Sterba R, et al. Marfan's syndrome: Natural history and long-term follow-up of cardiovascular involvement. J Am Coll Cardiol 1989
  2. Aggarwal S, Qamar A, Sharma V, Sharma A. Abdominal aortic aneurysm: A comprehensive review. Exp Clin Cardiol 2011
  3. Valji K. Vascular and interventional radiology. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Saunders
  4. Bryce Y, Rogoff P, Romanelli D, Reichle R. Endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms: Vascular anatomy, device selection, procedure, and procedure-specific complications. Radiographics 2015
  5. Schermerhorn ML, O'Malley AJ, Jhaveri A, Cotterill P, Pomposelli F, Landon BE. Endovascular vs. open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms in the Medicare population. N Engl J Med 2008
  6. Aburahma AF, Campbell JE, Mousa AY, Hass SM, Stone PA, Jain A, et al. Clinical outcomes for hostile versus favorable aortic neck anatomy in endovascular aortic aneurysm repair using modular devices. J Vasc Surg 2011
  7. Kim HO, Yim NY, Kim JK, Kang YJ, Lee BC. Endovascular aneurysm repair for abdominal aortic aneurysm: A comprehensive review. Korean J Radiol 2019
  8. Numan F, Gülşen F, Arbatlı H, Cantaşdemir M, Solak S. Aort anevrizmalarının endovasküler tedavisinde yeni ufuklar. Turk Gogus Kalp Dama 2011
  9. 19 Suppl 2:27-32. 10. Sönmez B, Arbatlı H, Yağan N, Arpaz M, Demirsoy E, Tükenmez F ve ark. Aort hastalıklarında endovasküler gelişmeler. In: Duran E, editör. Kalp ve Damar Cerrahisi. İstanbul: Çapa Tıp Kitabevi
  10. s. 1651-72. 11. National Vascular Registry 2019 Annual Report. The Royal College of Surgeons of England, Vascular Society of Great Britain and Ireland (VSGBI), British Society of Interventional Radiology (BSIR). [Accessed: December 13, 2019] 12. Collin J, Araujo L, Walton J, Lindsell D. Oxford screening programme for abdominal aortic aneurysm in men aged 65 to 74 years. Lancet 1988
  11. Ashton HA, Buxton MJ, Day NE, Kim LG, Marteau TM, Scott RA, et al. The Multicentre Aneurysm Screening Study (MASS) into the effect of abdominal aortic aneurysm screening on mortality in men: A randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2002
  12. Lindholt JS, Juul S, Fasting H, Henneberg EW. Screening for abdominal aortic aneurysms: Single centre randomised controlled t