SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Kırklareli Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi / 2019 / Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 2

THE EVALUATION OF COMPETITIVENESS PERFORMANCE FOR DEVELOPING EIGHT COUNTRIES BY GREY TOPSIS

Bahadır Fatih YILDIRIM
Sultan KUZU YILDIRIM
Pages
70–79
Publication Date
2019-07-02
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Pakistan is the lowest competitiveness country.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The World Economic Forum has developed the Global Competitiveness Index to measure the countries' competitiveness and rank the countries according to their level of competition.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This index is calculated separately for each country starting from 2007 considering the 12 indicators.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Pakistan is the lowest competitiveness country.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2007 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Global Competitiveness Index · TOPSIS-G

Özet

The World Economic Forum has developed the Global Competitiveness Index to measure the countries' competitiveness and rank the countries according to their level of competition. This index is calculated separately for each country starting from 2007 considering the 12 indicators. In this study, a new ranking has been obtained for 8 countries (D-8) developed with TOPSIS-G method by using the annual Global Competitiveness Index data published by the World Economic Forum over the period of 2007 to 2017. The relationship between the ranking of TOPSIS-G and observed ranking was investigated by Spearman-Rank correlation coefficient and Kendall Tau nonparametric correlation coefficients. As a result, it was determined that the ranking found with TOPSIS-G method was strongly related to the annual published rankings. In addition, the new ranking is less affected by competing rankings over the years. While the country with the highest level of competitiveness with Topsis-G method is Malaysia, Turkey is third. Pakistan is the lowest competitiveness country.

🔖

Cite This Article

YILDIRIM, B. F., YILDIRIM, S. K. (2019). THE EVALUATION OF COMPETITIVENESS PERFORMANCE FOR DEVELOPING EIGHT COUNTRIES BY GREY TOPSIS. Kırklareli Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 2, 70–79. https://ajindex.com/articles/417358

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Adıgüzel, M. (2013). Küresel Rekabet Gücünün Ölçülmesi ve Türkiye Bağlamında Bir Değerlendirme. Akademik Bakış Dergisi, 37, 1-21.
  2. Chen, P. Y., Popovich P.M. (2002), Correlation Parametric and Nonparametric Measures, Series:Quantitative Applications in Social Sciences, a Sage University Paper. Crouch, G. I. (2011). Destination competitiveness: An analysis of determinant attributes. Journal of Travel Research, 50(1), 27–45.
  3. Dejiang, W. (2009). Extension of TOPSIS method for R&D personnel selection problem with interval grey number. In Proceedings - International Conference on Management and Service Science, MASS 2009. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICMSS.2009.5304586
  4. Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas, Arturas Kaklauskas, Zenonas Turskis, J. T. (2009). Multi-Attribute Decision-Making Model by Applying Grey Numbers. Informatica. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(97)00147-1
  5. Hong, W. C. (2009). Global competitiveness measurement for the tourism sector. Current issues in tourism, 12(2), 105-132.
  6. Jafarnejad, A., & Salimi, M. (2013). Grey TOPSIS method for supplier selection with litrature and Delphi critaria in an auto company. Academia Arena, 5(12), 40-46.
  7. Jiang, Y. X., Liu, Y. S., Ying, G. G., Wang, H. W., Liang, Y. Q., & Chen, X. W. (2015). A new tool for assessing sediment quality based on the Weight of Evidence approach and grey TOPSIS. Science of the Total Environment. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.08.004
  8. Lall, S. (2001). Competitiveness indices and developing countries: an economic evaluation of the global competitiveness report. World development, 29(9), 1501-1525.
  9. Lee, S. M., & Peterson, S. J. (2000). Culture, entrepreneurial orientation, and global competitiveness. Journal of world business, 35(4), 401-416.
  10. Lin, Y. H., Lee, P. C., & Ting, H. I. (2008). Dynamic multi-attribute decision making model with grey number evaluations. Expert Systems with Applications. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2007.08.064
  11. Lin, Y. H., Lee, P. C., Chang, T. P., & Ting, H. I. (2008). Multi-attribute group decision making model under the condition of uncertain information. Automation in Construction. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2008.02.011
  12. Nyaoga, R., Magutu, P., & Wang, M. (2016). Application of Grey-TOPSIS approach to evaluate value chain performance of tea processing chains. Decision Science Letters. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.dsl.2016.1.002
  13. Oztaysi, B. (2014). A decision model for information technology selection using AHP integrated TOPSIS-Grey: The case of content ma