Journals / Turkish Journal of Gastroenterology / 2022 / Cilt: 33 - Sayı: 6

Prolonged Intestinal Transit Time and Its Relation with Capsule Endoscopy Diagnostic Yield

Pages
520–524
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: Age and intestinal transit time were significantly associated with the presence of abnormal findings on capsule endoscopy.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Background: Capsule endoscopy is a gold standard diagnostic method for small bowel lesions.
📊
Key Findings & Data:There is scarce evidence regarding variables that may increase the odds of identifying small bowel lesions with this endoscopic method.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: Age and intestinal transit time were significantly associated with the presence of abnormal findings on capsule endoscopy.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Background: Capsule endoscopy is a gold standard diagnostic method for small bowel lesions. There is scarce evidence regarding variables that may increase the odds of identifying small bowel lesions with this endoscopic method. The aim of this work is to describe variables associated with a higher probability of finding small bowel lesions on capsule endoscopy. Methods: Cross-sectional study was performed using our Department’s adult patients’ capsule endoscopy database. The presence of any small bowel mucosal lesion was registered. Other variables were examined: age, gender, reason for referral, quality of bowel cleansing, and intestinal transit time. These variables were compared between those patients showing at least 1 lesion versus those without lesions. Univariate and multivariate analysis was performed to determine variables significantly associated with the presence of bowel lesions. Results: In total, 140 studies were analyzed; 90% were performed due to occult gastrointestinal bleeding. Median age was 69 years (60-75); 54.29% were males. Bowel cleansing was adequate in 94.29%; 68.57% showed at least 1 lesion. Non-significant difference was observed in terms of age between groups of comparison (70 [61-76] vs 63 [59-74], P = .07). No difference was found comparing bowel cleansing, gender, or reason for referral. Intestinal transit time was significantly longer among those patients with a bowel lesion (359 minutes [257-427] vs 279 minutes [200-333], P = .05). On multivariate analysis, age and intestinal time were significantly associated with the presence of at least one small bowel lesion (odds ratio 1.02 [1-1.06] and 1.09 [1.03-1.12], respectively). Conclusion: Age and intestinal transit time were significantly associated with the presence of abnormal findings on capsule endoscopy.

🔖

Cite This Article

LASA, J., CERNADAS, G., OLIVERA, P. A., MOORE, R. (2022). Prolonged Intestinal Transit Time and Its Relation with Capsule Endoscopy Diagnostic Yield. Turkish Journal of Gastroenterology, Cilt: 33 - Sayı: 6, 520–524. https://ajindex.com/articles/417305

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Spada C, McNamara D, Despott EJ, et al. Performance measures for small-bowel endoscopy: a European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Quality Improvement Initiative. U Eur Gastroenterol J. 2019
  2. 7(5):614-641. [CrossRef] 2. Park SC, Keum B, Hyun JJ, et al. A novel cleansing score system for capsule endoscopy. World J Gastroenterol. 2010
  3. 16(7):875-880. [CrossRef] 3. Westerhof J, Koornstra JJ, Hoedemaker RA, Sluiter WJ, Kleibeuker JH, Weersma RK. Diagnostic yield of small bowel capsule endoscopy depends on the small bowel transit time. World J Gastroenterol. 2012
  4. 18(13):1502-1507. [CrossRef] 4. Lewis B. Capsule endoscopy-transit abnormalities. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 2006
  5. 16(2):221-228, vii. [CrossRef] 5. Rondonotti E, Spada C, Adler S, et al. Small-bowel capsule endoscopy and device-assisted enteroscopy for diagnosis and treatment of small-bowel disorders: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) technical review. Endoscopy. 2018
  6. 50(4):423- 446. [CrossRef] 6. Ehrhard F, Nazeyrollas P, Brixi H, Heurgue-Berlot A, Thiéfin G. Proximal predominance of small bowel injury associated with uncoated low-dose aspirin therapy: a video capsule study in chronic users. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013
  7. 25(11):1265-1272. [CrossRef] 7. Saurin JC, Delvaux M, Gaudin JL, et al. Diagnostic value of endoscopic capsule in patients with obscure digestive bleeding: blinded comparison with video push-enteroscopy. Endoscopy. 2003
  8. 35(7):576-584. [CrossRef] 8. Westerhof J, Koornstra JJ, Weersma RK. Capsule endoscopy: a review from the clinician’s perspectives. Minerva Gastroenterol Dietol. 2008
  9. 54(2):189-207. 9. Koulaouzidis A, Iakovidis DK, Yung DE, et al. Novel experimental and software methods for image reconstruction and localization in capsule endoscopy. Endosc Int Open. 2018
  10. 6(2):E205-E210. [CrossRef] 10. Xia Y, Zhang L, Lu K, Wu L. 3D magnetic-resonance-coupling (MRC) localization of wireless capsule endoscopy. IEEE Conf Electromag Field Comput (CEFC). 2016:1-1. [CrossRef] 11. Enns RA, Hookey L, Armstrong D, et al. Clinical practice guidelines for the use of video capsule endoscopy. Gastroenterology. 2017
  11. 152(3):497-514. [CrossRef] 12. Wei W, Ge ZZ, Lu H, Gao YJ, Hu YB, Xiao SD. Effect of mosapride on gastrointestinal transit time and diagnostic yield of capsule endoscopy. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2007
  12. 22(10):1605-1608. [CrossRef] 13. Selby W. Complete small-bowel transit in patients undergoing capsule endoscopy: determining factors and improvement