SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Uluslararası Ekonomi ve Yenilik Dergisi / 2017 / Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 2

A Historical Review from Resource-Based View to Dynamic Capabilities

Kaynak Tabanlı Görüşten Dinamik Yeteneklere Tarihsel Bir İnceleme

Kader ŞAHİN
Tuğba KAPLAN
Pages
105–131
Publication Date
2017-10-20
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The contributions of this study are to explain the development of dynamic capabilities in chronologic order, to specify the important processes in the development of dynamic capabilities, to summarize the studies that include the lastly researches.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Dynamic Capabilities that enhance the Resource Based View tries to explain how firms will gain competitive advantage at difficult environment conditions.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The importance of dynamic capabilities is increasing in abroad and in our country, there are limited studies about dynamic studies, which strive to enlighten the complexity of studies that rise from different views.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The contributions of this study are to explain the development of dynamic capabilities in chronologic order, to specify the important processes in the development of dynamic capabilities, to summarize the studies that include the lastly researches.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Kaynak Tabanlı Görüş · Dinamik Yetenekler · Rekabet Avantajı

Abstract

Dynamic Capabilities that enhance the Resource Based View tries to explain how firms will gain competitive advantage at difficult environment conditions. The importance of dynamic capabilities is increasing in abroad and in our country, there are limited studies about dynamic studies, which strive to enlighten the complexity of studies that rise from different views. The aim of this study is to reveal theoretical foundations of dynamic capabilities that are based on resource based view throughout investigating the development of dynamic capabilities. The contributions of this study are to explain the development of dynamic capabilities in chronologic order, to specify the important processes in the development of dynamic capabilities, to summarize the studies that include the lastly researches.

Özet

Kaynak Tabanlı Görüş'ün bir uzantısı olarak geliştirilen Dinamik Yetenekler Yaklaşımı işletmelerin zorlu çevre şartlarında nasıl rekabet avantajı elde edeceklerini açıklamaya çalışmaktadır. Dinamik yetenekler yaklaşımının son yıllarda önemi giderek artmakta ve bu alanda farklı bakış açıları ile yapılan çalışmalar karmaşıklık yaratmaktadır. Bu karmaşıklıkları çözmeye uğraşan dinamik yetenekler yaklaşımı ile ilgili ülkemizde yapılan çalışmaların sayısı kısıtlıdır. Bu çalışmanın amacı, kaynak tabanlı görüşten yola çıkan dinamik yetenekler yaklaşımının gelişimini ele alarak dinamik yetenekler yaklaşımının teorik alt yapısını ortaya koymaktır. Kronolojik bir seyirle dinamik yeteneklerin gelişiminin açıklanması, dinamik yeteneklerin gelişimdeki önemli süreçlerin belirlenmesi, son dönem yapılan çalışmaları da kapsayacak bir biçimde özetlenmesi açılarından çalışmanın dinamik yetenekler yaklaşımı ile ilgili yazına katkı sağlaması beklenmektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ŞAHİN, K., KAPLAN, T. (2017). A Historical Review from Resource-Based View to Dynamic Capabilities. Uluslararası Ekonomi ve Yenilik Dergisi, Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 2, 105–131. https://ajindex.com/articles/417298

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Acar, Z. A. ve Zehir, C. (2008), "Kaynak Tabanlı İşletme Yetenekleri Ölçeği Geliştirilmesi ve Doğrulanması", Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi İşletme Fakültesi Dergisi, 8(1), 103-131.
  2. Ahen, F. (2014),"Ethically Constrained Optimization of Dynamic Capabilities: Towards Sustainable Global Health", Social Responsibility Journal, 10(3), 436 - 454. Akremi A. E., Perrigot, R. ve Piot-Lepetit I. (2015), "Examining the Drivers for Franchised Chains Performance through the Lens of the Dynamic Capabilities Approach", 53 (1), 145–165.
  3. Ali, S., Peters, L. D. ve Lettice, F. (2012), "An Organizational Learning Perspective on Conceptualizing Dynamic and Substantive Capabilities", Journal of Strategic Management, 20(7), 589-607.
  4. Ambrosini, V. ve Bowman, C. (2009), "What are Dynamic Capabilities and are They a Useful Construct in Strategic Management", International Journal of Management Reviews, 11 (1), 29-49.
  5. Aminu, I. A. ve Mahmood R. (2015), "Mediating Role of Dynamic Capabilities on the Relationship between Intellectual Capital and Performance: A Hierarchical Component Model Perspective in PLS-SEM Path Modeling", Research Journal of Business Management, 9(3): 443-456. (2016), "Modeling Dynamic Capabilities in their Logical Squence and Relation to Performance", The Social Sciences, 11(2), 106-112.
  6. Amit, R. ve Schoemaker, P. (1993), "Strategic Assets and Organisational Rent", Strategic Management Journal, 14(1), 33-46.
  7. Arafa, A. ve Elmaraghy W. (2011), "Manufacturing Strategy and Enterprise Dynamic Capability", CIRP Annals - Manufacturing Technology, 60, 507-510.
  8. Arena M., Azzone G., Cagno E., Silvestri A. ve Trucco P. (2014), "A Model for Operationalizing ERM in Project-Based Operations Through Dynamic Capabilities", International Journal of Energy Sector Management, 8(2), 178 - 197. Arend, R. J. ve Bromiley, P. (2009), "Assessing the Dynamic Capabilities View: Spare Change, Everyone?", Strategic Organization, 7(1), 75-90.
  9. Arend, R. J. (2012), "Entrepreneurship and Dynamic Capabilities: How Firm Age and Size Affect the Capability Enhancement-SME Performance Relationship", Small Business Economics, 42(1), 33-57. (2015), "Mobius’ Edge: Infinite Regress in the Resource-Based and Dynamic Capabilities Views", Strategic Organization, 13(1), 75-85.
  10. Arndt, F. ve Bach N. (2015), "Evolutionary and Ecological Conceptualization of Dynamic Capabilities: Identifying Elements of the Teece and Eisenhardt Schools", Journal of Management &Organization, 21(5), pp 701-704.
  11. Augier, M. ve Teece, D.