Journals / Uluslararası Ekonomi ve Yenilik Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 1

Financial Performance Evaluation of Food and Drink Index Using Fuzzy MCDM Approach

Pages
1–19
Publication Date
2019-03-25
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The proposed approach is reliable and provides the most suitable result comparing with other MCDM methods, and has a strong positive correlation with average results.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Performance evaluation presents a very complex field involving different criteria and contradicted information.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this study, a fuzzy MCDM approach is developed to evaluate the financial performance of companies listed in food and drink index of Istanbul Stock Exchange.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The proposed approach is reliable and provides the most suitable result comparing with other MCDM methods, and has a strong positive correlation with average results.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Bulanık EDAS · Finansal Performans Değerlendirme · Gıda ve İçecek İndeksi

Abstract

Performance evaluation presents a very complex field involving different criteria and contradicted information. Though, there is an insisting need to a reliable and consistent approach where the application procedures are not complicated. In this study, a fuzzy MCDM approach is developed to evaluate the financial performance of companies listed in food and drink index of Istanbul Stock Exchange. Financial ratios were identified to create a base for financial performance evaluation in the areas of: profitability, efficiency, growth, liquidity, leverage and market ratios. Weight coefficients were obtained by the objective method of FSE. Evaluation and ranking were made on the base of the new method of FEDAS. In order to test the reliability of the approach a sensitivity analysis is conducted based on CRITIC weighting method. Comparison with FTOPSIS, FVIKOR, FCOPRAS, FMOORA and FSAW methods and spearman correlation are conducted to test validity of the proposed approach. The proposed approach is reliable and provides the most suitable result comparing with other MCDM methods, and has a strong positive correlation with average results.

Özet

Performans değerlendirmesi, farklı kriterler ve çelişkili veriler içeren çok karmaşık bir çalışma alanıdır. Daha kaliteli bir sonuca ulaşmak için araştırmacılar var olan bütün verilere dayanarak en uygun yöntemleri kullanmaya çalışmışlardır. Bu çalışmada, ÇKKV yöntemlerine dayanan bir finansal performans değerlendirme modeli önerilmektedir. Önerilen bu modeli Gıda ve İçecek İndeksinde yer alan firmaların finansal performansını değerlendirmek için uygulanmıştır. Çalışmada, karlılık, verimlilik, büyüme, likidite, kaldıraç ve piyasa oranları kullanılmıştır. Kriterleri ağırlıklandırmak amacıyla FSE, alternatifleri sıralamak amacıyla ise FEDAS yöntemleri kullanılmıştır. Çalışmada önerilen yaklaşımın güvenilirliğini test etmek için CRITIC ağırlıklandırma yöntemine dayalı bir duyarlılık analizi yapılmıştır. Ayrıca, yaklaşımın geçerliliğini test etmek için FTOPSIS, FVIKOR, FCOPRAS, FMOORA ve FSAW yöntemleriyle karşılaştırmalar yapılmıştır. Çalışma sonucunda önerilen modelin güvenilir olduğu tespit edilmiş olup diğer ÇKKV yöntemleriyle karşılaştırıldığında en uygun sonucu sağladığı görülmüştür.

🔖

Cite This Article

ALDALOU, E., PERÇİN, S. (2019). Financial Performance Evaluation of Food and Drink Index Using Fuzzy MCDM Approach. Uluslararası Ekonomi ve Yenilik Dergisi, Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 1, 1–19. https://ajindex.com/articles/417289

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Aras, G., Tezcan, N., and Kutlu Furtuna, Ö. (2018). Comprehensive evaluation of the financial performance for intermediary institutions based on multi-criteria decision making method. Journal of Capital Markets Studies, 2(1), 37-49.
  2. Chadwick, L. (1984). Comparing financial performance: Ratio analysis and retail management. Retail and Distribution Management, 12(2), 35-37.
  3. Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., and Papayannakis, L. (1995). Determining objective weights in multiple criteria problems: the critic method. Comput Oper Res, 22(7), 763–70.
  4. Edirisinghe, N.C.P. and Zhang, X. (2008). Portfolio selection under DEA-based relative financial strength indicators: case of US industries. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 59(6), 842-856.
  5. Erkayman, B., Khorshidi, M., and Usanmaz, B. (2018). An integrated fuzzy approach for ERP deployment strategy selection under conflicting criteria. Atatürk Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 32(3), 807-823.
  6. Gündoğdu, F.K., Kahraman, C., and Civan, H.N. (2018). A novel hesitant fuzzy EDAS method and its application to hospital selection. Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems, 35, 6353-6365.
  7. Ilieva, G., Yankova, T. and Klisarova-Belcheva, S. (2018). Decision Analysis with Classic and Fuzzy EDAS Modifications. Computational & Applied Mathematics. 37. Jitmaneeroj, B. (2017). Does investor sentiment affect price-earnings ratios?. Studies in Economics and Finance, 34(2), 183-193.
  8. Kahraman, C., Keshavarz-Ghorabaee, M., Zavadskas, E., Çevik, S., Yazdani, M. and Öztayşi, B. (2017). Intuitionistic fuzzy EDAS method: an application to solid waste disposal site selection. Journal of Environmental Engineering and Landscape Management. 25, 1-12.
  9. Karaşan, A., and Kahraman, C. (2017). Interval-Valued Neutrosophic Extension of EDAS Method. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, 343–357.
  10. Karimi, A. and Barati, M. (2018). Financial performance evaluation of companies listed on Tehran Stock Exchange: A negative data envelopment analysis approach. International Journal of Law and Management, 60(3), 885-900.
  11. Katchova, A.L., and Enlow, S.J. (2013). Financial performance of publicly‐traded agribusinesses. Agricultural Finance Review, 73(1), 58-73.
  12. Keshavarz-Ghorabaee, M., Zavadskas, E., Olfat, L., and Turskis, Z. (2015). Multi-Criteria Inventory Classification Using a New Method of Evaluation Based on Distance from Average Solution (EDAS). Informatica. 26, 435–451.
  13. Keshavarz-Ghorabaee, M., Zavadskas, E., Amiri, M. and Tur