SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Challenge Journal of Structural Mechanics / 2022 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 1

Earthquake resistant design of reinforced concrete retaining walls considering the project location change effect

ZÜLAL AKBAY ARAMA
İlknur DALYAN
Muhammed Selahaddin AKIN
Pages
27–37
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

As the result, the influence rates of the investigated project variants have been explained considering site-specific retaining wall design in terms of integrated relations of the design parameters.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this paper, the design process of reinforced concrete retaining walls is investigated under the issue of “project location change effect” which becomes a significant requirement to assess the earthquake resistant design depending on the new Turkish Building Earthquake Code-2018 (TBEC-2018).
📊
Key Findings & Data:Within this context, in the light of the related code, fourteen different districts which are located in the Anatolian Side of Istanbul Province (Turkey) have been taken into consideration, to search for also the effects of the supported earth fill depth, the unit weight and the shear strength angle of surrounding soil and the external loading conditions.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:As the result, the influence rates of the investigated project variants have been explained considering site-specific retaining wall design in terms of integrated relations of the design parameters.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2018 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

In this paper, the design process of reinforced concrete retaining walls is investigated under the issue of “project location change effect” which becomes a significant requirement to assess the earthquake resistant design depending on the new Turkish Building Earthquake Code-2018 (TBEC-2018). Within this context, in the light of the related code, fourteen different districts which are located in the Anatolian Side of Istanbul Province (Turkey) have been taken into consideration, to search for also the effects of the supported earth fill depth, the unit weight and the shear strength angle of surrounding soil and the external loading conditions. In this way, it has been aimed to focus on the application details of the design code and reflect the outcomes of the analysis in terms of the changes that happened in wall dimensions depending on the locations of project. Besides, with this study, it is aimed to reveal that the definition of type sectional wall will not be possible with the new code. As the result, the influence rates of the investigated project variants have been explained considering site-specific retaining wall design in terms of integrated relations of the design parameters.

🔖

Cite This Article

ARAMA, Z. A., DALYAN, İ., AKIN, M. S. (2022). Earthquake resistant design of reinforced concrete retaining walls considering the project location change effect. Challenge Journal of Structural Mechanics, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 1, 27–37. https://ajindex.com/articles/415496

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. AFAD (2021). Deprem Katoloğu. T.C. İçişleri Bakanlığı Afet ve Acil Durum Yönetimi Başkanlığı, Deprem Dairesi Başkanlığı, https://deprem.afad.gov.tr/depremkatalogu; https://deprem.afad. gov.tr/ddakatalogu. Downloaded on 03-02-2021. (in Turkish) Ahmadi-Nedushan B, Varaee H (2009). Optimal design of reinforced concrete retaining walls using a swarm intelligence technique. Proceedings of the 1st International Soft Computing Technology in Civil, Structural and Environmental Engineering, Stirlingshire, Scotland, 1-12.
  2. Akkar S, Azak TE, Can T, Çeken U, Demircioğlu MB, Duman TY, Erdik M, Ergintav S, Kadirioglu FT, Kalafat D, Kale Ö, Kartal RF, Kekovalı K, Kılıç T, Özalp S, Poyraz SA, Sesetyan K, Tekin S, Yakut A, Yılmaz MT, Yücemen MS, Fercan Ö (2018). Evaluation of seismic hazard maps in Turkey. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 16(8), 3197-3228.
  3. Aksoylu C, Mobark A, Arslan MH, Erkan İH (2020). A comparative study on ASCE 7-16, TBEC 2018 and TEC-2007 for reinforced concrete buildings. Revista de la Construcción, 19(2), 282-305.
  4. Atmaca N, Atmaca A (2019). Comparison of 2018 and 2007 Turkish Earthquake Regulations. The International Journal of Energy & Engineering Sciences, 4(2), 19-25.
  5. Azizi F (1999). Applied Analyses in Geotechnics. Taylor and Francis Group, New York. Bowles JE (1988). Foundation Analysis and Design. McGraw-Hill, New York. Dagdeviren U, Kaymak B (2020). A regression-based approach for estimating preliminary dimensioning of reinforced concrete cantilever retaining walls. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 61, 1657-1675.
  6. Elçi H, Göker KA (2018). Comparison of earthquake codes (TEC 2007 and TBEC 2018) in terms of seismic performance of RC columns. International Journal of Scientific and Technological Research, 4(6), 9-21.
  7. Gürsoy Ş (2013). İstinat duvarlarına etkiyen aktif zemin etkilerinin Eurocode-8 ve Türkiye Deprem Yönetmeliğine göre karşılaştırılması. Gazi University Journal of Science Part C: Design and Technology, 1(4), 153-160.
  8. Kaveh A, Khayatazad M (2014). Optimal design of cantilever retaining walls using ray optimization method. Iranian Journal of Science and Technology, Transactions of Civil Engineering, 38(C1), 261-274.
  9. Kayhan AH, Demir A (2018). Statik ve dinamik yüklere maruz betonarme konsol istinat duvarlarının diferansiyel gelişim algoritması ile optimum tasarımı. Pamukkale University Journal of Engineering Sciences, 24(3), 403-412. (in Turkish) Keskin E, Bozdoğan KB (2018). 2007 ve 2018 Deprem Yönetmeliklerinin Kırkl