Journals / Challenge Journal of Structural Mechanics / 2021 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 4

Optimization of cylindrical wall domes via metaheuristic algorithms

Pages
180–187
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

According to the analysis results, Jaya algorithm is slightly better in terms of the speed of reaching the optimum result, but also all algorithms are quite effective and reliable in solving the problem.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Optimization is a widely used phenomenon in various problems and fields.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Although different methods are used in the realization of the optimization process, the performance of metaheuristic algorithms in solving problems has led to an increase in research on these methods.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:According to the analysis results, Jaya algorithm is slightly better in terms of the speed of reaching the optimum result, but also all algorithms are quite effective and reliable in solving the problem.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Optimization is a widely used phenomenon in various problems and fields. Because time and resources are very limited in today's world, it can be said that the usage area of the optimization process will be expanded and spread in all areas of life. Although different methods are used in the realization of the optimization process, the performance of metaheuristic algorithms in solving problems has led to an increase in research on these methods. As in other fields, the application examples of these algorithms are diversifying and increasing in the field of structural engineering. In this study, the performance comparison of five different algorithms for the optimum design of an axisymmetric cylindrical wall with a dome is investigated. These algorithms are Jaya (JA), Flower pollination (FPA), teaching-learning-based optimization (TLBO) algorithms and two hybrid versions of these algorithms. ACI 318 regulation was used in reinforced concrete design with a flexibility method-based approach in the analyses. In the analyzes with five different situations of the wall height, some statistical values , and data of analysis numbers were obtained by running the algorithms a large number of times. According to the analysis results, Jaya algorithm is slightly better in terms of the speed of reaching the optimum result, but also all algorithms are quite effective and reliable in solving the problem.

🔖

Cite This Article

KAYABEKİR, A. E. (2022). Optimization of cylindrical wall domes via metaheuristic algorithms. Challenge Journal of Structural Mechanics, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 4, 180–187. https://ajindex.com/articles/473704

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Akin A, Saka MP (2010). Optimum detailed design of reinforced concrete continuous beams using the Harmony Search Algorithm. Tenth International Conference on Computational Structures Technology, Stirlingshire, UK, 131. Bekdas G (2014). Optimum design of axially symmetric cylindrical reinforced concrete walls. Structural Engineering and Mechanics, 51(3), 361-375.
  2. Bekdaş G (2015). Harmony Search Algorithm approach for optimum design of post-tensioned axially symmetric cylindrical reinforced concrete walls. Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, 164(1), 342-358.
  3. Bekdaş G (2018). New improved metaheuristic approaches for optimum design of posttensioned axially symmetric cylindrical reinforced concrete walls. The Structural Design of Tall and Special Buildings, 27(7), e1461. Bekdaş G (2019). Optimum design of post‐tensioned axially symmetric cylindrical walls using novel hybrid metaheuristic methods. The Structural Design of Tall and Special Buildings, 28(1), e1550. Bekdaş G, Nigdeli SM (2013). Optimization of T-shaped RC flexural members for different compressive strengths of concrete. International Journal of Mechanics, 7, 109-119.
  4. Bekdas G, Nigdeli SM (2014). The optimization of slender reinforced concrete columns. PAMM, 14(1), 183-184.
  5. Bekdas G, Nigdeli SM (2016a). Bat algorithm for optimization of reinforced concrete columns. PAMM, 16(1), 681-682.
  6. Bekdaş G, Nigdeli SM (2016b). Optimum design of reinforced concrete columns employing teaching learning based optimization. 12th International Congress on Advances in Civil Engineering, 1-8.
  7. Bekdaş G, Nigdeli SM (2017). Modified harmony search for optimization of reinforced concrete frames. International Conference on Harmony Search Algorithm, Springer, Singapore, 213-221.
  8. Billington DP (1965).
  9. Thin Shell Structures. McGraw-Hill, New York. Cakiroglu C, Islam K, Bekdaş G, Billah M (2021). CO2 emission and cost optimization of concrete-filled steel tubular (CFST) columns using metaheuristic algorithms. Sustainability, 13(14), 8092. Camp CV, Akin A (2011). Design of retaining walls using big bang–big crunch optimization. Journal of Structural Engineering, 138(3), 438-448.
  10. Ceranic B, Fryer C, Baines RW (2001). An application of simulated annealing to the optimum design of reinforced concrete retaining structures. Computers & Structures, 79(17), 1569-1581.
  11. Coello CC, Hernández FS, Farrera FA (1997). Optimal design of reinforced concrete beams using genetic algorithms. Expert systems with Applications, 12(1),