Journals / Medicine Science / 2022 / Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 1

Investigation of the effect of video-assisted training on symptom management in patients undergoing liver transplantation

Pages
102–110
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It is recommended that new studies should be carried out in Turkey as it decreases the symptoms in MTSORD-58TR scale scoring.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of video-assisted training on symptom management in patients having liver transplantation.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Data of the semi-experimental pre-test, post-test control group type study were collected from all patients who had liver transplantation for the first time between November 1, 2017 and May 31, 2018.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It is recommended that new studies should be carried out in Turkey as it decreases the symptoms in MTSORD-58TR scale scoring.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2017 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of video-assisted training on symptom management in patients having liver transplantation. Data of the semi-experimental pre-test, post-test control group type study were collected from all patients who had liver transplantation for the first time between November 1, 2017 and May 31, 2018. When the confidence interval was calculated as 95% in the known sample, the number of patients to be included in the study was 60. Patients were divided into two groups as control (n=30) and experiment (n=30) randomly. The data were collected by the sociodemographic form and the MTSORD-58TR scale and by the researcher by face-to-face interview technique. Video-assisted training for symptom management was applied to the patients and the experimental group patients were given video-assisted training before and after the surgery. One month after discharge, symptom management score was examined when they came to the control. No intervention was applied to the control group. Symptoms and distress were measured sequentially-ordinally. The control group patients having liver transplantation were found to have statistically higher scores than the experimental group (U=319.000, p=0.053) and distress (U=313.000, p=0.043). The control group patients having liver transplantation were found to have statistically higher scores after the video training (U=166.000, p<0.001) and distress (U=174.5, p<0.001) than the experimental group. As a result, it is known that our video training and counseling service given to the experimental group reduced the symptoms in the scoring of the MTSORD-58TR scale and was effective in increasing the quality of life of the patients. It is recommended that new studies should be carried out in Turkey as it decreases the symptoms in MTSORD-58TR scale scoring.

🔖

Cite This Article

GÜVENÇ, E. F., TUNA, A. (2022). Investigation of the effect of video-assisted training on symptom management in patients undergoing liver transplantation. Medicine Science, Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 1, 102–110. https://ajindex.com/articles/415331

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Grinyo JM. Why is organ transplantation clinically ımportant?.Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Med. 2013;3:1-10
  2. Taşkıran E, Akar H, Yıldırım M, Erbaş O. Complications of hematopoetic stem cell transplantation. Türkiye FNG &Bilim Tıp Transplantasyon Dergisi. 2016;1:59-66
  3. Teramoto K, Ji ZZ, Takayama Y, et al. Quality of life following liver transplantation. Nihon Geka Gakkai Zasshi. 1993;94:475-9
  4. Mendoza-Sánchez F, Ramírez-González LR, Reyes-Cruz AA, et al. Liver transplantation. Best Practice Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2003;17:277-89
  5. Kwon CHD, Lee SK, Ha J. Trend and outcome of korean patients receiving overseas solid organ transplantation between 1999 and 2005. J Korean Academy Medical Sciences. 2011;26:17-21
  6. Rosen HR, Shackleton CR, Martin P. Indications for and timing of liver transplantation. Medical Clinics North America. 1996;80:1069-102
  7. Butt Z, Parikh ND, Skaro AI, et al. Quality of life, risk assessment, and safety research in liver transplantation: new frontiers in health services and outcomes research. Current Opinion in Organ Transplantation 2012;17:241-7
  8. Sarper B. The reliability and validity of liver disease quality of life instrument 1.0 for Turkish society. 2007, Master Thesis, Ege University, Izmir
  9. Bozdemir, H. Quality of life in patients who underwent liver transplantations. 2006. Master Thesis, Dokuz Eylul University, Izmir
  10. Şahin N. Adherence to immunosupressive treatment after liver and kidney transplantation and factor that affect adherence 2016, Master Thesis, Dokuz Eylul University, Izmir
  11. Bayhan B. Validity and relabilty of the immunosuppressant therapy adherence scale (ITAS) 2014, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi, İzmir
  12. Kaçmaz N, Barlas GÜ. The Psychosocial Status of Liver Transplant Patients and Their Relatives Regarding the Procedure’s Effects on Their Quality of Life. Journal of Psychiatric Nursing. 2014;5:1-8
  13. İşeri ÖP, Karayurt Ö, Yılmaz S. Living with a foreign organ: counselling needs of living liver transplant recipients. Cukurova Med J. 2018;43:81-90
  14. Dąbrowska-Bender M, Michałowicz B, Pączek L. Assessment of the quality of life in patients after liver transplantation as an important part of treatment results.Transplantation Proceedings. 2016;48:1697-702
  15. Cetkin HE, Tuna A. How does health education given to lung cancer patients before thoracotomy affect pain, anxiety, and respiratory functions?. Journal of Cancer Education. 2018;1007/s13187-018-1401-1