SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Elektronik Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi / 2016 / Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 56

ORGANIZATIONAL NEURO STUDIES AND ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS

Ayse ESMERAY YOĞUN
Pages
0–0
Publication Date
2016-01-15
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Keywords: Neuroscience; Organizational Neuroscience Techniques; Social Cognitive Neuroscience; Organizational Behavior; Ethical Considerations

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Cognitive neuroscience as a multidisciplinary field, seeks to understand human behavior at the intersection of social, cognitive, and neural spheres of science.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Neuroscience can help organizations become more effective by support productivity and employee satisfaction.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Keywords: Neuroscience; Organizational Neuroscience Techniques; Social Cognitive Neuroscience; Organizational Behavior; Ethical Considerations
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Cognitive neuroscience as a multidisciplinary field, seeks to understand human behavior at the intersection of social, cognitive, and neural spheres of science. Neuroscience can help organizations become more effective by support productivity and employee satisfaction. With this paper, it is aimed to contribute to literature with the potential promise of cognitive side of organizational behavior as synergic young field. The main aim of this paper is to discuss neuroscience techniques and ongoing studies with ethical perception that already existed in the organizational behavior field. This new field has emerged to investigate the cognitive neuroscience of organizational behavior and so, organizational scholars have begun to take note of the potential implications of neuroscience at workplace research, the popularity of new field is attested by recent conferences, special issues of journals. But the theoretical codes of this new science derive from an uneasy embracing of two different field of social behavior: sociobiology and evolutionary psychology on the one hand, and social psychology on the other. Keywords: Neuroscience; Organizational Neuroscience Techniques; Social Cognitive Neuroscience; Organizational Behavior; Ethical Considerations

🔖

Cite This Article

YOĞUN, A. E. (2016). ORGANIZATIONAL NEURO STUDIES AND ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS. Elektronik Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 56, 0–0. https://ajindex.com/articles/415309

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Adolphs, R. (2003); Special issue on cognitive neuroscience of social behavior. Neuropsychologia 41, 117 Adolphs, R. (2009). The social brain: Neural basis of social knowledge. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 693–716
  2. Arvey, R. D., Rotundo, M., Johnson, W., Zhang, Z., & McGue, M. (2006). The determinants of leadership role occupancy: Genetic and personality factors. The Leadership Quarterly, 17, 1–20.
  3. Arvey, R. D., Zhang, Z., Avolio, B. J., & Kruger, R. F. (2007). Developmental and genetic determinants of leadership role occupancy among women. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 693–706.
  4. Ashkanasy, N. M. (2003). Emotions in organizations: A multi-level perspective. Research in Multi-Level Issues, 2, 9–54
  5. Becker, W. J., & Cropanzano, R. (2010). Organizational neuroscience: The promise and prospects of an emerging discipline. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 31, 1055–1059. Bergué, C. D. (2010). Brain and human behavior in organizations: A field of neuro-organizational behavior. In A. A. Stanton, M. Day & I. M. Welpe (Eds.), Neuroeconomics and the firm. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar. Boyatzis, R. E., Smith, M. L., & Blaize, N. (2006). Developing sustainable leaders through coaching and compassion. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 5, 8–24.
  6. Cacioppo, J. T. (2001). et al. (eds) Foundations in Social Neuroscience (MIT Press,
  7. Cambridge, Massachusetts. Camerer, C. F., Loewenstein, G. F. & Prelec, D. (2005). Neuroeconomics: How Neuroscience Can Inform Economics. Journal of Economic Literature, 43(1), 9- 64. Cohen, M. D.& P. Bacdayan. (1994). Organizational routines are stored as procedural memory: Evidence from a laboratory study. Organ. Sci. 5 554–568.
  8. David, A. Waldman, P.A, Balthazard, & Suzanne J. P. (2009). Can We Revolutionize the Way That Inspirational Leaders Are Identified and Developed? Information Systems, 60–75.
  9. Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Acad. Management Rev. 14 532–550. In Elsbach et al., 2005
  10. Elsbach, Barr, & Hargadon. S. (2005). Identifying Situated Cognition in Organizations Organization Science 16(4), pp. 422–433.
  11. Finkelstein, S., & Hambrick, D. (1996). Strategic leadership: Top executives and their effects on organizations. St. Paul, MN: West Publishing Frost, C. J., & Lumia, A. R. (2012). The Ethics of Neuroscience and the Neuroscience of Ethics: A Phenomenological–Existential Approach. Sci Eng Ethics 18:457–474, DOI 10.1007/s11948‐012‐9388‐1. Goleman, D., Boyatzis, R., & McKee, A. (2001).