Journals / Elektronik Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi / 2016 / Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 58

EVALUATION OF UNIVERSITY EMPLOYEES’ WORK BEHAVIOURS PERFORMANCE VIA ENTROPY BASED TOPSIS METHODS

Pages
0–0
Publication Date
2016-07-15
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

As a result, applying TOPSIS method in terms of measuring employees' job performance can conduct to measure qualitative works converting into quantitative works.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study is aimed to measure the employees' job performance behavior via the entropy based TOPSIS methods.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Integrated evaluation of all criteria is vital for performance measurement.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:As a result, applying TOPSIS method in terms of measuring employees' job performance can conduct to measure qualitative works converting into quantitative works.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This study is aimed to measure the employees' job performance behavior via the entropy based TOPSIS methods. For this purpose, work behaviors; burnout, emotional labor, intention to leave, and job satisfaction scales are taken as assessment criteria and a questionnaire is applied on public university employees. Integrated evaluation of all criteria is vital for performance measurement. At this point multi-criteria decision-making methods present an appropriate framework. MCDM methods are very suitable decision tools for measuring employee’s performance. This method is used in order to measure performance for not only the number of work but also the attitude according to business, enterprise, and people getting services. Considering the researches done via TOPSIS are few, this work contributes to the literature. Because of appropriate scales are in opposite directions, TOPSIS method accepted as a MCDM method is used to reduce all scales to only one value. As a result, applying TOPSIS method in terms of measuring employees' job performance can conduct to measure qualitative works converting into quantitative works.

🔖

Cite This Article

KINGIR, S., KARAKAŞ, A., ÖZTEL, A. (2016). EVALUATION OF UNIVERSITY EMPLOYEES’ WORK BEHAVIOURS PERFORMANCE VIA ENTROPY BASED TOPSIS METHODS. Elektronik Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 58, 0–0. https://ajindex.com/articles/415233

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Alp, İ., Öztel, A., & M. Said, K. (2015). Entropi Tabanlı MAUT Yöntemi İle Kurumsal Sürdürülebilirlik Performansı Ölçümü: Bir Vaka Çalışması. The International Journal of Economic and Social Research, 11(2), 65-81.
  2. Avcı, U. Ve Boylu, Y. (2010). Türk Turizm Çalışanları İçin Duygusal Emek Ölçeği Geçerlemesi. SOID Seyahat ve Otel İşletmeciliği Dergisi. 7(2) B.M. Staw, R. Sutton, L. Pelled Employee positive emotions and favorable outcomes at the workplace Organization Science, 5 (1994), pp. 51–71
  3. B.M. Staw, S.G. Barsade Affect and managerial performance: A test of the sadder-but-wiser vs. happier-and-smarter hypothesis Administrative Science Quarterly, 38 (1993), pp. 304–331
  4. Barutçugil, İ. (2004). Organizasyonlarda Duyguların Yönetimi. Kariyer Yayınları:
  5. İstanbul.
  6. Baycan, F.A., (1985). Farklı Gruplarda Çalışan Gruplarda İş Doyumunun Bazı Yönlerinin Analizi. Published Doctoral Dissertation. Boğaziçi University, Istanbul. Blau, G., & Boal, K. (1989). Using job involvement and organizational commitment interactively to predict turnover. Journal of management, 15(1), 115-127.
  7. Chu, K. Hei-Lin ve Murrmann, K. S. (2006). Development and validation of the hospitality emotional labor scale. Tourism Management. 27(6), 1181-1191
  8. Çokluk, Ö. (2000). Örgütlerde Tükenmişlik: Yönetimde Çağdaş Yaklaşımlar. (Edit: Cevat Elma ve Kamile Demir). Ankara:
  9. Anı Yayıncılık. Cote, S., & Miners, C. T. (2006). Emotional intelligence, cognitive intelligence, and job performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 51(1), 1-28.
  10. Ergin, C. (1992). Doktor ve Hemşirelerde Tükenmişlik ve Maslach Tükenmişlik Ölçeğinin Uyarlanması. iç. Rüveyda BAYRAKTAR ve İhsan DAĞ (Ed.), VII. Ulusal Psikoloji Kongresi Bilimsel Çalışmaları. Ankara: Türk Psikologlar Derneği Yayını, ss. 143–154.
  11. Gerald R. Ferris, Timothy P. Munyon, Kevin Basik, M. Ronald Buckley, The performance evaluation context: Social, emotional, cognitive, political, and relationship components, Human Resource Management Review, Volume 18, Issue 3, September 2008, Pages 146-163, ISSN 1053-4822, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2008.07.006.
  12. Grandey, A. A. (1999). The Effects of Emotional Labor: Employee Attitudes, Stress and Performance. Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi. Colorado State University, USA. Gursoy, D., Boylu, Y. ve Avci, U. (2011). Identifying the Complex Relationships Among Emotional Labor and Its Correlates. International Journal of Hospitalitiy Management. 30, 7983-7984.
  13. Hochschild, A. R. (1979).
  14. Emotion Work, Feeling Rules And Social St