Journals / Sigma Mühendislik ve Fen Bilimleri Dergisi / 2018 / Cilt: 36 - Sayı: 4

DETECTION OF THE COMPLEX GROUND PROBLEMS BY GROUND PENETRATING RADAR: EXAMPLES FROM GÜMÜŞHANE UNIVERSITY

Pages
1297–1310
Publication Date
2018-12-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

These results show that GPR technique is an effective tool to provide a good image and solution for the complex ground problems.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR) technique was used for the detection of i) the reasons of deformations which occur in the field ground of Gümüşhane University Sport Complex (GUSC), and ii) the congestion in flow pipe of Gümüşhane University, Engineering and Natural Sciences Faculty (GUENSF).
📊
Key Findings & Data:GPR data was collected by using the RAMAC CU II device and a shielded antenna with a 500 MHz center frequency.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:These results show that GPR technique is an effective tool to provide a good image and solution for the complex ground problems.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:: GPR · clogged zones · flow pipe

Abstract

In this study, Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR) technique was used for the detection of i) the reasons of deformations which occur in the field ground of Gümüşhane University Sport Complex (GUSC), and ii) the congestion in flow pipe of Gümüşhane University, Engineering and Natural Sciences Faculty (GUENSF). GPR data was collected by using the RAMAC CU II device and a shielded antenna with a 500 MHz center frequency. The wave fields for GUSC were examined by 2D and 3D processing. The large-scaled hyperbolic reflections are in corresponds to the areas where the field ground has deformations. It is considered that these anomaly areas may include a gap or a padding having a large gap and suggested that these damaged areas must be full with hard materials. The large-scaled hyperbolic reflections approximately starts in one-meter depth and reaches three-meters. For GUENSF, the measurements were conducted on the route where the main flow pipe crosses. In GPR sections, hyperbolas with high amplitudes were observed in the zones where flow pipe passes. Information on slope of flow pipe was provided by examining the association of these hyperbolas with the depth, and the clogged zones were detected. It is stated that unclogging the clogged zones of the flow pipe will not fully contribute to the resolution of the problem. Therefore, it is suggested to provide necessary slope to the flow pipe by completely removing and mounting back. These results show that GPR technique is an effective tool to provide a good image and solution for the complex ground problems.

🔖

Cite This Article

SARI, M., ÖZTÜRK, S. (2018). DETECTION OF THE COMPLEX GROUND PROBLEMS BY GROUND PENETRATING RADAR: EXAMPLES FROM GÜMÜŞHANE UNIVERSITY. Sigma Mühendislik ve Fen Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 36 - Sayı: 4, 1297–1310. https://ajindex.com/articles/415062

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Beres M. Jr., and Haeni F. P. (1991) Application of ground-penetrating-radar methods in hydrological studies, Ground Water, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 375-386
  2. Knödel K., Lange G., and Gerhard H. J. (2007) Environmental Geology: Handbook of field methods and case studies, Bundesanstalt für Geowissenschaften, Berlin: Springer, 2008, ISBN 978-3-540 74669-0
  3. Cook J. C. (1975) Radar transparencies of mines and tunnel rocks, Geophysics, vol. 40, no. 5, pp. 865-885
  4. Harrison C. H. (1970) Reconstruction of subglacial relief from echo sounding records, Geophysics, vol. 35, no. 6, pp. 1099-1115
  5. Watts R. D., and England A. W. (1976) Radio-echo sounding of temperate glaciers: ice properties and sounder design criteria, Journal of Glaciology, vol. 17, no. 75, pp. 39-48
  6. Holser W. T., Brown R. J. S., Roberts F. A., Fredriksson O. A., and Unterberger R. R. (1972) Radar logging of a salt dome, Geophysics, vol. 37, no. 5, pp. 889-906
  7. Annan A. P., Davis J. L., and Vaughan C. J. (1984) Radar mapping of buried pipes and cables, A-Cubed, Inc., Tech., Note 1, 17 pp
  8. Davis J. L., and Annan A. P. (1989) Ground penetrating radar for high resolution mapping of soil and rock stratigraphy, Geophysical Prospecting, vol. 37, no. 5, pp. 531-551
  9. Koralay T., Kadıoğlu S., and Kadıoğlu Y. K. (2007) A new approximation in determination of zonation boundaries of ignimbrite by ground penetrating radar: Kayseri, Central Anatolia, Turkey, Environmental Geology, vol. 52, no. 7, pp. 1387-1397
  10. Grandjean G., and Gourry J. C. (1996) GPR data processing for 3D fracture mapping in a marble quarry (Thasos, Greece), Journal of Applied Geophysics, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 19-30
  11. Green A., Gross R., Holliger K., Horstmeyer H., and Baldwin J. (2003) Results of 3-D georadar surveying and trenching the San Andreas fault near its northern landward limit, Tectonophysics, vol. 368, no. 1-4, pp. 7-23
  12. Kadıoğlu S. (2008) Photographing layer thicknesses and discontinuities in a marble quarry with 3D GPR visualization, Journal of Applied Geophysics, vol. 64, no. 3, pp. 109-114
  13. Sarı M., and Öztürk S. (2016) Detecting of damaged areas in the ground of BESYO Sport Complex in Gumushane, Turkey, with the Ground Penetrating Radar Method, 1st International Mediterranean Science and Engineering Congress (IMSEC 2016), 633-639 pp., Paper ID:206, Adana, Turkey
  14. Kadıoğlu S., Ulugergerli E. U., and Daniels J. J. (2006) 3D visualization to map cavities by GPR method: Dalaman Akkopru dam re